1
|
Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Borrajo GJC, Khneisser I, Schielen PCJI, Knight-Madden J, Malherbe HL, Kase M. Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023). Int J Neonatal Screen 2024; 10:38. [PMID: 38920845 PMCID: PMC11203842 DOI: 10.3390/ijns10020038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford L. Therrell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
- National Newborn Screening and Global Resource Center, Austin, TX 78759, USA
| | - Carmencita D. Padilla
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines;
| | - Gustavo J. C. Borrajo
- Detección de Errores Congénitos—Fundación Bioquímica Argentina, La Plata 1908, Argentina;
| | - Issam Khneisser
- Jacques LOISELET Genetic and Genomic Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Peter C. J. I. Schielen
- Office of the International Society for Neonatal Screening, Reigerskamp 273, 3607 HP Maarssen, The Netherlands;
| | - Jennifer Knight-Madden
- Caribbean Institute for Health Research—Sickle Cell Unit, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica;
| | - Helen L. Malherbe
- Centre for Human Metabolomics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa;
- Rare Diseases South Africa NPC, The Station Office, Bryanston, Sandton 2021, South Africa
| | - Marika Kase
- Strategic Initiatives Reproductive Health, Revvity, PL10, 10101 Turku, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Odenwald B, Brockow I, Hanauer M, Lüders A, Nennstiel U. Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:35. [PMID: 37489488 PMCID: PMC10366861 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening using dried blood spots (NBS) is widely acknowledged as a highly successful procedure in secondary prevention. For a number of congenital disorders, severe disability or death are impressively prevented by early detection and early treatment through NBS. However, as with any other screening, NBS can also cause harm, and the principle that "the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harms" must be considered when introducing and implementing NBS programmes. This publication compiles the results of a systematic literature research on requirements for NBS infrastructure and procedures which was conducted as part of a research project on the quality and shortcomings of the NBS pathway in Germany. The compilation contains the requirements and recommendations for realising the principle of "maximise benefits and minimise harms" in relevant NBS pathway components such as parental education and information, coverage, timeliness, laboratory quality assurance, follow-up of abnormal results, confirmatory diagnostics, documentation, and evaluation. The results reflect the complexity of NBS infrastructure, and thus, they illustrate the importance of considering and implementing NBS as a well-coordinated public health programme with continuous quality management. Special attention should be paid to the perspectives of parents and families. Some NBS issues can substantially benefit from digital instruments or international cooperation. The literature review presented here has contributed to a concept of proposals for the advancement of NBS in Germany, and despite different settings, it may as well be of interest for other countries to achieve the best possible course and outcome of NBS for each child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Odenwald
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Uta Nennstiel
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kubala SA, Sandhu A, Palacios-Kibler T, Ward B, Harmon G, DeFelice ML, Bundy V, Younger MEM, Lederman H, Liang H, Anzabi M, Ford MK, Heimall J, Keller MD, Lawrence MG. Natural history of infants with non-SCID T cell lymphopenia identified on newborn screen. Clin Immunol 2022; 245:109182. [PMID: 36368643 PMCID: PMC9756444 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2022.109182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) can identify infants with non-SCID T cell lymphopenia (TCL). The purpose of this study was to characterize the natural history and genetic findings of infants with non-SCID TCL identified on NBS. We analyzed data from 80 infants with non-SCID TCL in the mid-Atlantic region between 2012 and 2019. 66 patients underwent genetic testing and 41 (51%) had identified genetic variant(s). The most common genetic variants were thymic defects (33%), defects with unknown mechanisms (12%) and bone marrow production defects (5%). The genetic cohort had significantly lower median initial CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4/CD45RA+ T cell counts compared to the non-genetic cohort. Thirty-six (45%) had either viral, bacterial, or fungal infection; only one patient had an opportunistic infection (vaccine strain VZV infection). Twenty-six (31%) of patients had resolution of TCL during the study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kubala
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Amandeep Sandhu
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Thamiris Palacios-Kibler
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Brant Ward
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Gretchen Harmon
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE, United States of America
| | - Magee L DeFelice
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE, United States of America
| | - Vanessa Bundy
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - M Elizabeth M Younger
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Howard Lederman
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Hua Liang
- Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Marianne Anzabi
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Megan K Ford
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy & Critical Care, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Heimall
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Michael D Keller
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Monica G Lawrence
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kobrynski LJ. Newborn Screening in the Diagnosis of Primary Immunodeficiency. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2022; 63:9-21. [PMID: 34292457 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08876-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Newborn screening for severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) is the first inborn error of immunity (IEI) to be detected through population screening. It also represents the first newborn screening test to utilize molecular testing on DNA from newborn dried blood spots. Newborn screening for SCID has provided opportunities to measure the population prevalence of this disorder and evaluate the effect of early interventions on the overall outcomes in affected infants. The success of SCID newborn screening has increased interest in developing and implementing molecular testing for other clinically significant inborn errors of immunity. This methodology has been adapted to screen for another monogenic inborn defect, spinal muscle atrophy. Advances in the clinical care and new therapeutics for many inborn errors of immunity support the need for early diagnosis and prompt institution of therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis may also improve the quality of life for affected patients. This article provides an overview of newborn screening for SCID, recommended steps for follow-up testing and early intervention as well as long-term follow-up. Numerous challenges remain, including the development of clinical consensus regarding confirmatory and diagnostic testing, early interventions, and best practices for immune reconstitution in affected infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Kobrynski
- Pediatrics Institute, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strubbe S, De Bruyne M, Pannicke U, Beyls E, Vandekerckhove B, Leclercq G, De Baere E, Bordon V, Vral A, Schwarz K, Haerynck F, Taghon T. A Novel Non-Coding Variant in DCLRE1C Results in Deregulated Splicing and Induces SCID Through the Generation of a Truncated ARTEMIS Protein That Fails to Support V(D)J Recombination and DNA Damage Repair. Front Immunol 2021; 12:674226. [PMID: 34220820 PMCID: PMC8248492 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) is a primary deficiency of the immune system in which opportunistic and recurring infections are often fatal during neonatal or infant life. SCID is caused by an increasing number of genetic defects that induce an abrogation of T lymphocyte development or function in which B and NK cells might be affected as well. Because of the increased availability and usage of next-generation sequencing (NGS), many novel variants in SCID genes are being identified and cause a heterogeneous disease spectrum. However, the molecular and functional implications of these new variants, of which some are non-coding, are often not characterized in detail. Using targeted NGS, we identified a novel homozygous c.465-1G>C splice acceptor site variant in the DCLRE1C gene in a T-B-NK+ SCID patient and fully characterized the molecular and functional impact. By performing a minigene splicing reporter assay, we revealed deregulated splicing of the DCLRE1C transcript since a cryptic splice acceptor in exon 7 was employed. This induced a frameshift and the generation of a p.Arg155Serfs*15 premature termination codon (PTC) within all DCLRE1C splice variants, resulting in the absence of full-length ARTEMIS protein. Consistently, a V(D)J recombination assay and a G0 micronucleus assay demonstrated the inability of the predicted mutant ARTEMIS protein to perform V(D)J recombination and DNA damage repair, respectively. Together, these experiments molecularly and functionally clarify how a newly identified c.465-1G>C variant in the DCLRE1C gene is responsible for inducing SCID. In a clinical context, this demonstrates how the experimental validation of new gene variants, that are identified by NGS, can facilitate the diagnosis of SCID which can be vital for implementing appropriate therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Strubbe
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Ulrich Pannicke
- The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elien Beyls
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bart Vandekerckhove
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Georges Leclercq
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elfride De Baere
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Victoria Bordon
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne Vral
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Klaus Schwarz
- The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics Ulm, Germa Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessen, Ulm, Germany
| | - Filomeen Haerynck
- Primary Immunodeficiency Research Lab, Jeffrey Modell Diagnosis and Research Center, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology and Pulmonology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Taghon
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|