T Cell Response Toward Tissue-and Epidermal-Transglutaminases in Coeliac Disease Patients Developing Dermatitis Herpetiformis

Sensitization to Food and Aero-Allergens in Children with Coeliac Disease Assessed with the Use of a Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Technique

(1) Background. Coeliac disease (CD) often co-occurs with autoimmune conditions or genetic syndromes, but there are few studies on the co-existence of CD and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergies. The purpose of this study was to assess sensitization to food and aero-allergens in pediatric patients with CD. (2) Methods. A multiplex ALEX®2 test was used to determine specific IgEs (sIgEs). (3) Results. The study included 108 children newly diagnosed with CD. Allergen extract- and/or allergen molecule-sIgEs were detected in 49.1% of children. Most children (41.5%) were sensitized to both inhalant and food allergens. The three most common aero-allergens (timothy pollen, ryegrass, silver birch) were molecules Phl p 1, Lol p 1, and Bet v 1. The most common food allergens (hazelnut, apple, and peanut) were Cor a 1, Mal d 1, and Ara h 8 molecules of the PR-10 subfamily. Patients were not sensitized to cereal allergens containing gluten. Spearman's rank correlation analysis of sensitized patients showed a significant positive relationship (r = 0.31) between the patients' age and the occurrence of positive sIgEs (≥0.3 kUA/L) for inhalant allergen molecules (p = 0.045). In sensitized patients, mainly symptoms of inhalant allergy were observed, such as hay fever, conjunctivitis, and bronchial asthma. (4) Conclusions. The current study indicates the co-occurrence of IgE sensitization to food and inhalant allergens in children with CD. The study highlights the need to take a closer look at the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergy in patients with CD, which may help in their care and lead to a better understanding of the relationship between CD and IgE-mediated allergy.

Coeliac disease: the paradox of diagnosing a food hypersensitivity disorder with autoantibodies

Serum antibodies to the autoantigen transglutaminase 2 (TG2) are increasingly harnessed to diagnose coeliac disease. Diagnostic guidelines for children give recommendation for a no-biopsy-based diagnosis through detection of high amounts of IgA anti-TG2 antibodies in serum with confirmation of positivity in a separate blood sample by characteristic autoantibody-staining of tissue. While measurement of IgA anti-TG2 also is important in the diagnostic workup of adults, the adult guidelines still mandate examination of gut biopsies. This requirement might well change in the future, as might the necessity for confirming autoantibody positivity by tissue staining. The key role of autoantibody serology for diagnosis of coeliac disease is paradoxical. Coeliac disease was considered, and still can be considered, a food intolerance disorder where autoantibodies at face value are out of place. The immunological mechanisms underlying the formation of autoantibodies in response to gluten exposure have been dissected. This review presents the current insights demonstrating that the autoantibodies in coeliac disease are intimately integrated in the maladapted immune response to gluten.

Clinical and immunological characteristics of TGM3 in pan-cancer: A potential prognostic biomarker

Background: Recent studies have identified that transglutaminases (TGMs) are involved in a widespread epigenetic modification in tumorigenesis. However, it remains unclear how transglutaminase 3 (TGM3) affects in pan-cancer. The present study aimed to explore the clinical and prognostic function of TGM3 in pan-cancer as well as to explore the relationship of TGM3 expression with clinical stage, survival rate, prognosis condition, immune infiltration and mutation indicators. Methods: The relevant data of tumors were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), TARGET, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. According to the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and TIMER databases, we evaluated the protein expression levels of TGM3 in different organs and tissues as well as their association with immune cell infiltration and immunotherapeutic response in pan-cancers. Expression differences between normal and tumor tissues as well as survival and prognosis situation, clinical data characteristics, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and RNA methylation were also assessed. Oncogenic analyses were also evaluated by GSEA. Results: Compared to normal tissues, some tumor tissues had a lower expression level of TGM3, while other tumor tissues had a high expression level of TGM3. Further studies showed that high TGM3 expression had a certain risk impact on pan-cancer as high TGM3 expression levels were detrimental to the survival of several cancers, except for pancreatic cancer (PAAD). High expression level of TGM3 was also related to higher clinical stages in most cancers. The expression level of TGM3 was significantly negatively correlated with the expression of immune infiltration-related cells, including B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Furthermore, in most cancer types, TGM3 was inversely correlated with TMB, MSI, and methylation, suggesting that TGM3 expression can be used to assess potential therapeutic response, especially immune-related targeted therapy. GSEA analysis elucidated the biological and molecular function of TGM3 in various cancer types. Taken together, these bioinformatic analyses identified TGM3 as an important biomarker for clinical tumor prognosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy. Conclusion: We comprehensively analyzed the clinical characteristics, tumor stages, immune infiltration, methylation level, gene mutation, functional enrichment analysis and immunotherapeutic value of TGM3 in pan-cancer, providing implications for the function of TGM3 and its role in clinical treatment.

When Foods Cause Itch: Clinical Characteristics, Pathophysiology, and Recommendations for Food-Induced Skin and Mucosal Pruritus

Itch occurs in various dermatologic and systemic conditions. Many patients report that certain foods instigate itch, although there is limited published information in dermatology on food-induced pruritus. In addition, itch severity is rarely mentioned. Food can induce pruritus through either ingestion or direct contact with skin or mucosal membranes. The most common type of itch provoked by food is acute urticaria, often through the classical immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathway. Other mechanisms include non-IgE-mediated, mixed (IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated), T-cell-mediated, and nonimmune reactions. For patients presenting with urticaria, generalized pruritus, oral pruritus, or dermatitis, a thorough history is warranted, and possible food associations should be considered and assessed. Although any food seems to have the potential to elicit an immune response, certain foods are especially immunogenic. Treatment includes avoidance of the trigger and symptom management. Careful consideration should be used as to avoid unnecessarily restrictive elimination diets.

Review article: Diagnosis of coeliac disease: a perspective on current and future approaches

Diagnostics will play a central role in addressing the ongoing dramatic rise in global prevalence of coeliac disease, and in deploying new non-dietary therapeutics. Clearer understanding of the immunopathogenesis of coeliac disease and the utility of serology has led to partial acceptance of non-biopsy diagnosis in selected cases. Non-biopsy diagnosis may expand further because research methods for measuring gluten-specific CD4+ T cells and the acute recall response to gluten ingestion in patients is now relatively straightforward. This perspective on diagnosis in the context of the immunopathogenesis of coeliac disease sets out to highlight current consensus, limitations of current practices, gluten food challenge for diagnosis and the potential for diagnostics that measure the underlying cause for coeliac disease, gluten-specific immunity.

When Foods Cause Itch: Clinical Characteristics, Pathophysiology, and Recommendations for Food-Induced Skin and Mucosal Pruritus

ABSTRACT

Itch occurs in various dermatologic and systemic conditions. Many patients report that certain foods instigate itch, although there is limited published information in dermatology on food-induced pruritus. In addition, itch severity is rarely mentioned. Food can induce pruritus through either ingestion or direct contact with skin or mucosal membranes. The most common type of itch provoked by food is acute urticaria, often through the classical immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathway. Other mechanisms include non-IgE-mediated, mixed (IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated), T-cell-mediated, and nonimmune reactions. For patients presenting with urticaria, generalized pruritus, oral pruritus, or dermatitis, a thorough history is warranted, and possible food associations should be considered and assessed. Although any food seems to have the potential to elicit an immune response, certain foods are especially immunogenic. Treatment includes avoidance of the trigger and symptom management. Careful consideration should be used as to avoid unnecessarily restrictive elimination diets.

Emergence of an adaptive immune paradigm to explain celiac disease: a perspective on new evidence and implications for future interventions and diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Recent patient studies have shown that gluten-free diet is less effective in treating celiac disease than previously believed, and additionally patients remain vulnerable to gluten-induced acute symptoms and systemic cytokine release. Safe and effective pharmacological adjuncts to gluten-free diet are in preclinical and clinical development. Clear understanding of the pathogenesis of celiac disease is critical for drug target identification, establishing efficacy endpoints and to develop non-invasive biomarkers suitable to monitor and potentially diagnose celiac disease.

AREAS COVERED

The role and clinical effects of CD4+ T cells directed against deamidated gluten in the context of an "adaptive immune paradigm" are reviewed. Alternative hypotheses of gluten toxicity are discussed and contrasted. In the context of recent patient studies, implications of the adaptive immune paradigm for future strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat celiac disease are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective therapeutics for celiac disease are likely to be approved and necessitate a variety of new clinical instruments and tests to stratify patient need, monitor remission, and confirm diagnosis in uncertain cases. Sensitive assessments of CD4+ T cells specific for deamidated gluten are likely to play a central role in clinical management, and to facilitate research and pharmaceutical development.