Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome

Intratumoral Injection of Immunotherapeutics: State of the Art and Future Directions

Systemic immunotherapies have led to tremendous progress across the cancer landscape. However, several challenges exist, potentially limiting their efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors. Direct intratumoral injection can increase the therapeutic index of immunotherapies while overcoming many of the barriers associated with systemic administration, including limited bioavailability to tumors and potential systemic safety concerns. However, challenges remain, including the lack of standardized approaches for administration, issues relating to effective drug delivery, logistical hurdles, and safety concerns specific to this mode of administration. This article reviews the biologic rationale for the localized injection of immunotherapeutic agents into tumors. It also addresses the existing limitations and practical considerations for safe and effective implementation and provide recommendations for optimizing logistics and treatment workflows. It also highlights the critical role that radiologists, interventional radiologists, and medical physicists play in intratumoral immunotherapy with respect to target selection, image-guided administration, and response assessment.

Localization, tissue biology and T cell state - implications for cancer immunotherapy

Tissue localization is a critical determinant of T cell immunity. CD8+ T cells are contact-dependent killers, which requires them to physically be within the tissue of interest to kill peptide-MHC class I-bearing target cells. Following their migration and extravasation into tissues, T cells receive many extrinsic cues from the local microenvironment, and these signals shape T cell differentiation, fate and function. Because major organ systems are variable in their functions and compositions, they apply disparate pressures on T cells to adapt to the local microenvironment. Additional complexity arises in the context of malignant lesions (either primary or metastatic), and this has made understanding the factors that dictate T cell function and longevity in tumours challenging. Moreover, T cell differentiation state influences how cues from the microenvironment are interpreted by tissue-infiltrating T cells, highlighting the importance of T cell state in the context of tissue biology. Here, we review the intertwined nature of T cell differentiation state, location, survival and function, and explain how dysfunctional T cell populations can adopt features of tissue-resident memory T cells to persist in tumours. Finally, we discuss how these factors have shaped responses to cancer immunotherapy.

Site of distant metastasis affects the prognosis with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab is approved for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, the influence of the site of distant metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in R/M HNSCC remains unclear. We investigated the prognosis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab, focusing on the site of distant metastasis.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab between April 2017 and June 2020 at Saitama Prefectural Cancer Center. The differences in the prognosis were evaluated according to the site of distant metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients enrolled, 26 (63.4%) had lung metastasis, 7 (17.1%) had bone metastasis, and 4 (9.8%) had liver metastasis. Ten patients (24.4%) had single-organ distant metastasis (lung metastasis in all cases). Univariate analysis identified lung metastasis alone (single-organ distant metastasis) was associated with a significantly better prognosis [HR0.37 (95% CI) 0.14-0.97 p = 0.04], while liver metastasis was associated with a significantly worse prognosis [HR3.86 (95% CI) 1.26-11.8 p = 0.02]. Multivariate analysis identified lung metastasis alone and liver metastasis as independent prognostic factors. While 7 patients (70%) with lung metastasis alone could be continued on nivolumab treatment or received subsequent chemotherapy, only 1 patient (25%) with liver metastasis received subsequent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The site of distant metastasis affects the prognosis of R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab. Lung metastasis alone appears to be associated with a better prognosis, in that it allows easier transition to subsequent chemotherapy, while liver metastasis associates with a worse prognosis.

Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.

Impact of immune tolerance mechanisms on the efficacy of immunotherapy in primary and secondary liver cancers

The liver is a functionally unique organ with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. The liver is the sixth most common site of primary cancer in humans and is a frequent site of metastasis from other solid tumors. The development of effective therapies for primary and metastatic liver cancer has been challenging due to the complex metabolic and immune microenvironment of the liver. The liver tumor microenvironment (TME) in primary and secondary (metastatic) liver cancers is heterogenous and consists of unique immune and stromal cell populations. Crosstalk between these cell populations and tumor cells creates an immunosuppressive microenvironment within the liver which potentiates cancer progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now clinically approved for the management of primary and secondary liver cancer and can partially overcome liver immune tolerance, but their efficacy is limited. In this review, we describe the liver microenvironment and the use of immunotherapy in primary and secondary liver cancer. We discuss emerging combination strategies utilizing locoregional and systemic therapy approaches which may enhance efficacy of immunotherapy in primary and secondary liver cancer. A deeper understanding of the immunosuppressive microenvironment of the liver will inform novel therapies and therapeutic combinations in order to improve outcomes of patients with primary and secondary liver cancer.

Nivolumab or Atezolizumab in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Prognostic Index Based on Data from Daily Practice

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nivolumab and atezolizumab in advanced pre-treated NSCLC was documented in prospective trials. We aim to confirm the benefits and indicate predictive factors for immunotherapy in daily practice.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis. The median PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression method.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients (ECOG 0-1) with advanced NSCLC (CS III-IV) were eligible to receive nivolumab or atezolizumab as second-line treatment. Median PFS and OS were three months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-3.42) and 10 months (95% CI 8.03-11.96), respectively, for the overall population. The median OS for the atezolizumab arm was eight months (95% CI 5.89-10.1), while for the nivolumab group, it was 14 months (95% CI 10.02-17.97) (p = 0.018). The sum of all measurable changes >100.5 mm (p = 0.007; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005), PLT > 281.5 G/l (p < 0.001; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.003) and bone metastases (p < 0.004; HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.38) were independent negative prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. Based on preliminary analyses, a prognostic index was constructed to obtain three prognostic groups. Median OS in the subgroups was 16 months (95% CI 13.3-18.7), seven months (95% CI 4.83-9.17) and four months (95% CI 2.88-5.13), respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab and atezolizumab provided clinical benefit in real life. Clinical and laboratory factors may help to identify subgroups likely to benefit. The use of prognostic indices may be valuable in clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in inoperable or advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter real-world retrospective observational study (CTONG2004-ADV)

Background

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy have been approved as standards for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on two phase III trials. However, clinical trial results may not be representative of the general population, as clinical trials often have specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our research aims to investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab in inoperable or advanced NSCLC patients.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective observational study included inoperable or advanced pathologically confirmed NSCLC patients who received at least one dose of camrelizumab at 22 hospitals. Clinical and follow-up data of camrelizumab were collected retrospectively from the medical records. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) and secondary outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were applied to identify potential predictive factors of ORR and PFS, respectively.

Results

Between July 2019 and March 2021, 336 patients were included. Adenocarcinoma was seen in 58.4% and stage IV disease in 69.3%. Twenty-nine (8.6%) had liver metastasis at baseline. Most patients received camrelizumab in the first-line setting (74.1%) and in combination with chemotherapy (60.7%). The ORR was 40.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 34.9-45.6%] and DCR was 85.1% (95% CI: 81.3-88.9%), while the 6-month PFS and OS rates were 73.0% (95% CI: 67.1-78.0%) and 93.1% (95% CI: 89.8-95.4%), respectively. In multivariate analyses, liver metastasis [odds ratio (OR), 0.324; 95% CI: 0.115-0.915; P=0.033] and increasing lines of camrelizumab treatment (vs. first line, second line: OR, 0.347; 95% CI: 0.162-0.741; P=0.006; ≥ third line: OR, 0.126; 95% CI: 0.043-0.367; P<0.001) were negatively associated, while a longer duration of camrelizumab treatment was positively associated with ORR and PFS. TRAEs were recorded in 164 (48.8%) patients, without new safety signal.

Conclusions

We conducted a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness and safety profile of camrelizumab in a broader NSCLC population in real world NSCLC patients, and subgroup analysis indicated the presence of liver metastasis was associated with worse outcomes.

Immunotherapy and tumor mutational burden in cancer patients with liver metastases: A meta and real word cohort analysis

Background

The predictive effects of liver metastases for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the relationship between tumor mutational burden (TMB) and liver metastases (LM) remain unclear.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to explore the heterogeneity of ICIs efficacy between patients with or without LM. A pan-cancer cohort of 1,661 patients who received ICIs was downloaded and analyzed to assess the association between TMB and LM.

Results

Of 21053 studies identified in our search, eight single-arm studies and 24 randomized controlled trials were included. Overall, 17957 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers (4805 patients (26.8%) with LM and 13151 patients (73.2%) without LM) were enrolled. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 8.5% (95% CI 4%-13%) in the LM group versus 21% (95% CI 16%-21%) in the non-LM group. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.90) in the LM group treated with ICIs compared with the standard of care. In patients without LM who were treated with ICIs, the pooled HR for death was 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.82) compared with the standard of care. The difference in efficacy between patients with or without LM treated with ICIs was significant (p=0.04). Pan-cancer analysis revealed that the TMB-high rate was 10.8% in liver metastatic lesions versus 21.4% in other metastatic lesions (p=0.004). In addition, TMB was also significantly associated with OS as a binary cutoff (p=0.05) and was an independent prognostic variable (HR=0.98, P=0.047) as a continuous variable in patients with LM.

Conclusions

In patients with LM, the efficacy of immunotherapy was attenuated, but TMB-high could predict better survival outcomes.

Impact of Patient Characteristics on the Outcomes of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of malignancies that globally account for a significant portion of cancer incidence and cancer-related death. Survival outcomes for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary cancers remain poor, but new treatment paradigms are emerging with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This review characterizes patient-related prognostic factors that influence the response to ICI therapy. We performed an analysis of the landmark randomized clinical trials in esophageal, gastric, colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers in terms of patient demographic factors. A literature review of smaller retrospective studies investigating patient-related factors was completed. The immunological bases for these associations were further explored. The key predictive factors identified include age, sex, performance status, geography, body mass index, sarcopenia, gut microbiome, various biochemical factors, and disease distribution.

New Insights Into PTBP3 in Human Cancers: Immune Cell Infiltration, TMB, MSI, PDCD1 and m6A Markers

Polypyrimidine tract binding protein 3 (PTBP3) plays a critical role in post-transcriptional regulation. The role of PTBP3 in various human tumours was explored and analysed in this study based on the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets. PTBP3 was highly expressed in most tumours, such as breast invasive carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. PTBP3 overexpression generally predicts poor overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, low PTBP3 expression predicts poor prognosis in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. We also explored PTBP3 genetic alterations in different tumour tissues. The result found that the frequency of PTBP3 alteration (&gt;4%) was the highest in uterine tumours with “mutation” as the primary type. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between PTBP3 expression and tumour mutational burden and microsatellite instability in various human tumours, and found that PTBP3 expression was positively correlated with TMB in ACC, STAD, PAAD, LUAD, and SARC. Two enhanced phosphorylation levels of S30 and S426 in colon cancer, ovarian cancer, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma were found. Further analysis indicated that PTBP3 expression was positively correlated with the cancer-associated fibroblasts for most tumour types. This study also found a relationship between immune checkpoints and N6-methyladenosine-related markers and PTBP3 expression. Moreover, the “mRNA surveillance pathway” and “RNA degradation” were involved in the functional mechanisms of PTBP3. These results provide new insights for molecular studies, and integrative analysis provided a framework for determining the predictive, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance of PTBP3 in cancer patients.