Identifying New Hybrid Insulin Peptides (HIPs) in Type 1 Diabetes

Exploring new frontiers in type 1 diabetes through advanced mass-spectrometry-based molecular measurements

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a devastating autoimmune disease for which advanced mass spectrometry (MS) methods are increasingly used to identify new biomarkers and better understand underlying mechanisms. For example, integration of MS analysis and machine learning has identified multimolecular biomarker panels. In mechanistic studies, MS has contributed to the discovery of neoepitopes, and pathways involved in disease development and identifying therapeutic targets. However, challenges remain in understanding the role of tissue microenvironments, spatial heterogeneity, and environmental factors in disease pathogenesis. Recent advancements in MS, such as ultra-fast ion-mobility separations, and single-cell and spatial omics, can play a central role in addressing these challenges. Here, we review recent advancements in MS-based molecular measurements and their role in understanding T1D.

A structural basis of T cell cross-reactivity to native and spliced self-antigens presented by HLA-DQ8

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease that has a strong HLA association, where a number of self-epitopes have been implicated in disease pathogenesis. Human pancreatic islet-infiltrating CD4+ T cell clones not only respond to proinsulin C-peptide (PI40-54; GQVELGGGPGAGSLQ) but also cross-react with a hybrid insulin peptide (HIP; PI40-47-IAPP74-80; GQVELGGG-NAVEVLK) presented by HLA-DQ8. How T cell receptors recognize self-peptide and cross-react to HIPs is unclear. We investigated the cross-reactivity of the CD4+ T cell clones reactive to native PI40-54 epitope and multiple HIPs fused at the same N-terminus (PI40-54) to the degradation products of two highly expressed pancreatic islet proteins, neuropeptide Y (NPY68-74) and amyloid polypeptide (IAPP23-29 and IAPP74-80). We observed that five out of the seven selected SKW3 T cell lines expressing TCRs isolated from CD4+ T cells of people with T1D responded to multiple HIPs. Despite shared TRAV26-1-TRBV5-1 gene usage in some T cells, these clones cross-reacted to varying degrees with the PI40-54 and HIP epitopes. Crystal structures of two TRAV26-1+-TRBV5-1+ T cell receptors (TCRs) in complex with PI40-54 and HIPs bound to HLA-DQ8 revealed that the two TCRs had distinct mechanisms responsible for their differential recognition of the PI40-54 and HIP epitopes. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the PI40-54 and HIPs determined that the P2, P7, and P8 residues in these epitopes were key determinants of TCR specificity. Accordingly, we provide a molecular basis for cross-reactivity towards native insulin and HIP epitopes presented by HLA-DQ8.

β Cell Stress and Endocrine Function During T1D: What Is Next to Discover?

Canonically, type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a disease characterized by autoreactive T cells as perpetrators of endocrine dysfunction and β cell death in the spiral toward loss of β cell mass, hyperglycemia, and insulin dependence. β Cells have mostly been considered as bystanders in a flurry of autoimmune processes. More recently, our framework for understanding and investigating T1D has evolved. It appears increasingly likely that intracellular β cell stress is an important component of T1D etiology/pathology that perpetuates autoimmunity during the progression to T1D. Here we discuss the emerging and complex role of β cell stress in initiating, provoking, and catalyzing T1D. We outline the bridges between hyperglycemia, endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, and autoimmunity from the viewpoint of intrinsic β cell (dys)function, and we extend this discussion to the potential role for a therapeutic β cell stress-metabolism axis in T1D. Lastly, we mention research angles that may be pursued to improve β cell endocrine function during T1D. Biology gleaned from studying T1D will certainly overlap to innovate therapeutic strategies for T2D, and also enhance the pursuit of creating optimized stem cell-derived β cells as endocrine therapy.

Antigen-specific immunotherapy to restore antigen-specific tolerance in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease

Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease are chronic autoimmune conditions, characterized by a dysregulated immune response. In Type 1 diabetes, there is beta cell destruction and subsequent insulin deficiency whereas in Graves' disease, there is unregulated excessive thyroid hormone production. Both diseases result in significant psychosocial, physiological, and emotional burden. There are associated risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes and risks of thyrotoxicosis and orbitopathy in Graves' disease. Advances in the understanding of the immunopathogenesis and response to immunotherapy in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease have facilitated the introduction of targeted therapies to induce self-tolerance, and subsequently, the potential to induce long-term remission if effective. We explore current research surrounding the use of antigen-specific immunotherapies, with a focus on human studies, in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease including protein-based, peptide-based, dendritic-cell-based, and nanoparticle-based immunotherapies, including discussion of factors to be considered when translating immunotherapies to clinical practice.

Glutamine deamidation does not increase the immunogenicity of C-peptide in people with type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease in which the insulin-producing beta cells are destroyed. While it is clear that full-length C-peptide, derived from proinsulin, is a major antigen in human T1D it is not clear how and why C-peptide becomes a target of the autoimmune CD4⁺ T-cell responses in T1D. Neoepitopes formed by the conversion of glutamine (Q) residues to glutamic acid (E) by deamidation are central to the immune pathogenesis of coeliac disease and have been implicated in autoimmune responses in T1D. Here, we asked if the immunogenicity of full-length C-peptide, which comprises four glutamine residues, was enhanced by deamidation, which we mimicked by substituting glutamic acid for glutamine residue. First, we used a panel of 18 well characterized CD4⁺ T-cell lines specific for epitopes derived from human C-peptide. In all cases, when the substitution fell within the cognate epitope the response was diminished, or in a few cases unchanged. In contrast, when the substitution fell outside the epitope recognized by the TCR responses were unchanged or slightly augmented. Second, we compared CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation responses, against deamidated and unmodified C-peptide, in the peripheral blood of people with or without T1D using the CFSE-based proliferation assay. While, as reported previously, responses were detected to unmodified C-peptide, no deamidated C-peptide was consistently more stimulatory than native C-peptide. Overall responses were weaker to deamidated C-peptide compared to unmodified C-peptide. Hence, we conclude that deamidated C-peptide does not play a role in beta-cell autoimmunity in people with T1D.

Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes: Established Facts and New Insights

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the T-cell-mediated destruction of insulin-producing β-cells in pancreatic islets. It generally occurs in genetically susceptible individuals, and genetics plays a major role in the development of islet autoimmunity. Furthermore, these processes are heterogeneous among individuals; hence, different endotypes have been proposed. In this review, we highlight the interplay between genetic predisposition and other non-genetic factors, such as viral infections, diet, and gut biome, which all potentially contribute to the aetiology of T1D. We also discuss a possible active role for β-cells in initiating the pathological processes. Another component in T1D predisposition is epigenetic influences, which represent a link between genetic susceptibility and environmental factors and may account for some of the disease heterogeneity. Accordingly, a shift towards personalized therapies may improve the treatment results and, therefore, result in better outcomes for individuals in the long-run. There is also a clear need for a better understanding of the preclinical phases of T1D and finding new predictive biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and therapy, with the final goal of reverting or even preventing the development of the disease.