Case Report: Circulating Myeloid-Derived Suppressive-Like Cells and Exhausted Immune Cells in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Three Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Acting as Tormentors of Advanced Tumors by Unleashing Immune Cells and Associated Collateral Damage

Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), holds substantial promise in revolutionizing cancer treatment. This review explores the transformative impact of these combinations, emphasizing their potential for enhancing therapeutic outcomes across various cancers. Immune checkpoint proteins, such as PD1 and CTLA4, play a pivotal role in modulating immune responses. Blocking these checkpoints unleashes anticancer activity, and the synergy observed when combining multiple checkpoint inhibitors underscores their potential for enhanced efficacy. Nivolumab and ipilimumab harness the host's immune system to target cancer cells, presenting a powerful approach to prevent tumor development. Despite their efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors are accompanied by a distinct set of adverse effects, particularly immune-related adverse effects affecting various organs. Understanding these challenges is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and ensuring patient well-being. Ongoing clinical trials are actively exploring the combination of checkpoint inhibitory therapies, aiming to decipher their synergistic effects and efficacy against diverse cancer types. This review discusses the mechanisms, adverse effects, and various clinical trials involving nivolumab and ipilimumab across different cancers, emphasizing their transformative impact on cancer treatment.

High Levels of Circulating Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressive-Like Cells Are Associated With the Primary Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis

Background

Immunotherapy has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Some patients experience primary resistance to immunotherapy. Currently, we lack a marker of resistance to immunotherapy. Myeloid-derived suppressive-like cells (MDSCs) can reduce tumor response rate and survival outcomes.

Methods

This is an exploratory prospective observational study on metastatic NSCLC patients starting immunotherapy. Baseline peripheral blood samples were collected. Monocytic (M)-MDSCs were analyzed by flow cytometry. The main clinical outcomes were tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The association between MDSC levels and tumor response was assessed. The association of PFS with OS was investigated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Twenty-two patients were included. The median M-MDSC value was higher in patients with progressive disease than patients with stable disease or partial response, p = 0.045. The median MDSC value in the overall population was 1.9. We found worse PFS (HR = 2.51; p = 0.046) and OS (HR = 2.68; p = 0.042) in patients with M-MDSC values higher than the median.

Conclusions

In this exploratory analysis, high M-MDSC levels are strongly associated with primary resistance to immunotherapy. If validated in larger studies, MDSC levels in blood samples could help to select NSCLC patients for higher benefit from immunotherapy.

Multi-target combinatory strategy to overcome tumor immune escape

Immune therapy has become the fourth approach after surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in cancer treatment. Many immune checkpoints were identified in the last decade since ipilimumab, which is the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4, had been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma in 2011. The use of several antibody drugs that target PD1/PD-L1 for various cancer treatments has been approved by the FDA. However, fewer people are benefitting from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in solid cancers. Approximately 80% of patients do not respond appropriately because of primary or acquired therapeutic resistance. Along with the characterization of more immune checkpoints, the combinatory treatment of multiimmune checkpoint inhibitors becomes a new option when monotherapy could not receive a good response. In this work, the author focuses on the combination therapy of multiple immune checkpoints (does not include targeted therapy of oncogenes or chemotherapy), introduces the current progression of multiple immune checkpoints and their related inhibitors, and discusses the advantages of combination therapy, as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events.