Systemic Sclerosis in Zimbabwe: Autoantibody Biomarkers, Clinical, and Laboratory Correlates

Extended autoantibody panel in Turkish patients with early-stage systemic sclerosis: Coexpressions and their influences on clinical phenotypes

BACKGROUND/AIM

To investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of an extended autoantibody profile in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, serum from 100 consecutive patients was subjected to indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) (HEp-20-10/primate liver mosaic) and Systemic Sclerosis Profile by EUROIMMUN to evaluate anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and autoantibodies against 13 different autoantibodies in patients with SSc less than 3 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-three of 100 patients were positive for ANA by IIF. Fifty-three patients showed single positivity, 26 anti-topoisomerase antibodies (anti-Scl70 ab), 16 anticentromere antibodies (ACAs), six anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies (anti-RNAPIII ab), one anti-Ku antibody, one anti-PM/Scl100 antibody, two anti-PM/Scl75 antibodies, one anti-Ro52 antibody, whereas 32 patients had multiple autoantibody positivities. Among classic SSc-specific autoantibodies, anti-Scl70 and anti-RNAPIII abs showed the highest cooccurrence (n = 4). One patient was simultaneously positive for anti-RNAPIII ab and ACA, and one was positive for ACA and anti-Scl70 ab. The clinical features were not statistically different between single and multiple autoantibody-positivity for classic SSc-specific autoantibodies (ACA, anti-Scl70 ab, and anti-RNAPIII ab), except for digital ulcer in the multiantibody positive ACA group (p = .019).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, coexpression of autoantibodies is not uncommon in SSc patients. Although autoantibodies specific to SSc in early disease show generally known clinical features, it remains to be investigated how the coexpression of autoantibodies will affect clinical presentation.

Lung Function in Preschool Children in Low and Middle Income Countries: An Under-Represented Potential Tool to Strengthen Child Health

BACKGROUND

The burden of respiratory disease is high in low-middle income countries (LMIC). Pulmonary function tests are useful as an objective measure of lung health and to track progression. Spirometry is the commonest test, but its use is limited in preschool children. Other lung function methods have been developed but their use in LMIC has not been well described.

AIM

To review the use of preschool lung function testing in children in LMIC, with particular reference to feasibility and clinical applications.

METHODS

Electronic databases "PubMed", "Scopus"," Web of Science", and "EBSCO host" were searched for publications in low and middle income countries on preschool lung function testing, including spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), oscillometry, interrupter technique, tidal breathing and multiple breath washout (MBW), from 1 January 2011 to 31 January 2022. Papers in English were included and those including only children ≥6 years were excluded.

RESULT

A total of 61 papers from LMIC in Asia, South America, Africa, Eurasia or the Middle East were included. Of these, 40 included spirometry, 7 FeNO, 15 oscillometry, 2 interrupter technique, and 2 tidal breathing. The papers covered test feasibility (19/61), clinical application (46/61) or epidemiological studies (13/61). Lung function testing was successful in preschool children from LMIC. Spirometry was the most technically demanding and success gradually increased with age.

CONCLUSION

Preschool lung function testing is under-represented in LMIC for the burden of respiratory disease. These tests have the potential to strengthen respiratory care in LMIC, however access needs to be improved.