1
|
Harmacek D, Weidmann L, Castrezana Lopez K, Schmid N, Korach R, Bortel N, von Moos S, Rho E, Helmchen B, Gaspert A, Schachtner T. Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:1652-1663. [PMID: 38548057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Harmacek
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Weidmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Schmid
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Korach
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bortel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Rho
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cornell LD, Helanterä I. Exploring microvascular inflammation and the spectrum of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00537-9. [PMID: 39218157 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wellekens K, Coemans M, Callemeyn J, Cleenders E, Debyser T, De Pelsmaeker S, Emonds MP, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Pagliazzi A, Roufosse C, Senev A, Van Loon E, Vaulet T, Naesens M. Probable antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation is a rare and challenging phenotype to define: Findings from a single-center study. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00437-4. [PMID: 39029874 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
The Banff 2022 consensus introduced probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), characterized by mild AMR histologic features and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibody (DSA) positivity. In a single-center observational cohort study of 1891 kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2021, 566 kidney biopsies were performed in 178 individual HLA-DSA-positive transplants. Evaluated at time of the first HLA-DSA-positive biopsy of each transplant (N = 178), 84 of the 178 (47.2%) of first biopsies were scored as no AMR, 22 of the 178 (12.4%) as probable AMR, and 72 of the 178 (40.4%) as AMR. The majority (77.3%) of probable AMR cases were first diagnosed in indication biopsies. Probable AMR was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) than no AMR (20.2 [8.3-32.3] vs 40.1 [25.4-53.3]; P = .001). The one-year risk of (repeat) AMR was similar for probable AMR and AMR (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), 0.99; 0.42-2.31; P = .97) and higher than after no AMR (sHR, 3.05; 1.07-8.73; P = .04). Probable AMR had a higher five-year risk of transplant glomerulopathy vs no AMR (sHR, 4.29; 0.92-19.98; P = 06), similar to AMR (sHR, 1.74; 0.43-7.04; P = .44). No significant differences in five-year risk of graft failure emerged between probable AMR and AMR (sHR, 1.14; 0.36-3.58; P = .82) or no AMR (sHR, 2.46; 0.78-7.74; P = .12). Probable AMR is a rare phenotype, however, sharing significant similarities with AMR in this single-center study. Future studies are needed to validate reproducible diagnostic criteria and associated clinical outcomes to allow for defining best management of this potentially relevant phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolien Wellekens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evert Cleenders
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tim Debyser
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffi De Pelsmaeker
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Priyanka Koshy
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Angelica Pagliazzi
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thibaut Vaulet
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jane-Wit D, Song G, He L, Jiang Q, Barkestani M, Wang S, Wang Q, Ren P, Fan M, Johnson J, Mullan C. Complement Membrane Attack Complexes Disrupt Proteostasis to Function as Intracellular Alarmins. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4504419. [PMID: 38947095 PMCID: PMC11213201 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4504419/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Internalized pools of membrane attack complexes (MACs) promote NF-kB and dysregulated tissue inflammation. Here, we show that C9, a MAC-associated protein, promotes loss of proteostasis to become intrinsically immunogenic. Surface-bound C9 is internalized into Rab5 + endosomes whose intraluminal acidification promotes C9 aggregates. A region within the MACPF/CDC domain of C9 stimulates aggrephagy to induce NF-kB, inflammatory genes, and EC activation. This process requires ZFYVE21, a Rab5 effector, which links LC3A/B on aggresome membranes to RNF34-P62 complexes to mediate C9 aggrephagy. C9 aggregates form in human tissues, C9-associated signaling responses occur in three mouse models, and ZFYVE21 stabilizes RNF34 to promote C9 aggrephagy in vivo. Gene-deficient mice lacking ZFYVE21 in ECs showed reduced MAC-induced tissue injury in a skin model of chronic rejection. While classically defined as cytotoxic effectors, MACs may impair proteostasis, forming aggregates that behave as intracellular alarmins.
Collapse
|
5
|
Naesens M, Roufosse C, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Adam BA, Aubert O, Böhmig GA, Callemeyn J, Clahsen-van Groningen M, Cornell LD, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Halloran P, Hidalgo LG, Horsfield C, Huang E, Kikić Ž, Kozakowski N, Nankivell B, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Schinstock C, Solez K, Tambur AR, Thaunat O, Wiebe C, Zielinski D, Colvin R, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:338-349. [PMID: 38032300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Benjamin A Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marian Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Halloran
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, USA
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Brian Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Dina Zielinski
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Robert Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roufosse C, Naesens M, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Afrouzian M, Alachkar N, Aubert O, Bagnasco SM, Batal I, Bellamy COC, Broecker V, Budde K, Clahsen-Van Groningen M, Coley SM, Cornell LD, Dadhania D, Demetris AJ, Einecke G, Farris AB, Fogo AB, Friedewald J, Gibson IW, Horsfield C, Huang E, Husain SA, Jackson AM, Kers J, Kikić Ž, Klein A, Kozakowski N, Liapis H, Mangiola M, Montgomery RA, Nankinvell B, Neil DAH, Nickerson P, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Rosales I, Royal V, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Sarder P, Sarwal M, Schinstock C, Stegall M, Solez K, van der Laak J, Wiebe C, Colvin RB, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Work Plan: Data-driven refinement of the Banff Classification for renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:350-361. [PMID: 37931753 PMCID: PMC11135910 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
The XVIth Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Alberta, Canada, from September 19 to 23, 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. In addition to a key focus on the impact of microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis on the Banff Classification, further sessions were devoted to other aspects of kidney transplant pathology, in particular T cell-mediated rejection, activity and chronicity indices, digital pathology, xenotransplantation, clinical trials, and surrogate endpoints. Although the output of these sessions has not led to any changes in the classification, the key role of Banff Working Groups in phrasing unanswered questions, and coordinating and disseminating results of investigations addressing these unanswered questions was emphasized. This paper summarizes the key Banff Meeting 2022 sessions not covered in the Banff Kidney Meeting 2022 Report paper and also provides an update on other Banff Working Group activities relevant to kidney allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Marjan Afrouzian
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Nada Alachkar
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Serena M Bagnasco
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Verena Broecker
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marian Clahsen-Van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Shana M Coley
- Transplant Translational Research, Arkana Laboratories, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darshana Dadhania
- Department Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, USA
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John Friedewald
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Syed A Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jesper Kers
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Helen Liapis
- Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Nephrology Center, Germany
| | | | | | - Brian Nankinvell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Desley A H Neil
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Virginie Royal
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multiorgan Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pinaki Sarder
- Department of Medicine-Quantitative Health, University of Florida College of Medicine, Florida, USA
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Division of MultiOrgan Transplantation, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark Stegall
- Department Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hreško S, Maďarová M, Dobošová M, Palušeková N, Niznerová P, Žiaran S, Varga I. The Diagnostic Significance of C3d Antigen in Kidney and Skin Histopathology - The Current State-Of-The-Art and Practical Examples. Physiol Res 2023; 72:S225-S232. [PMID: 37888966 PMCID: PMC10669952 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.935175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this narrative review is to summarize recent knowledge about the diagnostic significance of immunobiological detection of C3d with a focus on renal and skin tissue biopsies. We completed the present narrative review with our own experiences with preparation and practical use of monoclonal C3d antibodies at a small national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hreško
- DB Biotech, a.s., Košice, Slovak Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mubarak M, Raza A, Rashid R, Shakeel S. Evolution of human kidney allograft pathology diagnostics through 30 years of the Banff classification process. World J Transplant 2023; 13:221-238. [PMID: 37746037 PMCID: PMC10514746 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i5.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide. This activity was, however, accompanied by many issues and challenges. An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of causes of graft dysfunction were and still are, a big challenge. Kidney allograft biopsy played a vital role in addressing the above challenge. However, its interpretation was not standardized for many years until, in 1991, the Banff process was started to fill this void. Thereafter, regular Banff meetings took place every 2 years for the past 30 years. Marked changes have taken place in the interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies, diagnosis, and classification of rejection and other non-rejection pathologies from the original Banff 93 classification. This review attempts to summarize those changes for increasing the awareness and understanding of kidney allograft pathology through the eyes of the Banff process. It will interest the transplant surgeons, physicians, pathologists, and allied professionals associated with the care of kidney transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Mubarak
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Amber Raza
- Department of Nephrology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Rahma Rashid
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Shaheera Shakeel
- Department of Histopathology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 74200, Sindh, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chauveau B, Garric A, Di Tommaso S, Raymond AA, Visentin J, Vermorel A, Dugot-Senant N, Déchanet-Merville J, Duong Van Huyen JP, Rabant M, Couzi L, Saltel F, Merville P. WARS1, TYMP and GBP1 display a distinctive microcirculation pattern by immunohistochemistry during antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19094. [PMID: 36352007 PMCID: PMC9646783 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23078-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the leading cause of allograft failure in kidney transplantation. Defined by the Banff classification, its gold standard diagnosis remains a challenge, with limited inter-observer reproducibility of the histological scores and efficient immunomarker availability. We performed an immunohistochemical analysis of 3 interferon-related proteins, WARS1, TYMP and GBP1 in a cohort of kidney allograft biopsies including 17 ABMR cases and 37 other common graft injuries. Slides were interpreted, for an ABMR diagnosis, by four blinded nephropathologists and by a deep learning framework using convolutional neural networks. Pathologists identified a distinctive microcirculation staining pattern in ABMR with all three antibodies, displaying promising diagnostic performances and a substantial reproducibility. The deep learning analysis supported the microcirculation staining pattern and achieved similar diagnostic performance from internal validation, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (± 0.02) for WARS1, 0.80 (± 0.04) for TYMP and 0.89 (± 0.04) for GBP1. The glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis scores, the hallmarks of histological ABMR, were the most highly correlated Banff scores with the deep learning output, whatever the C4d status. These novel immunomarkers combined with a CNN framework could help mitigate current challenges in ABMR diagnosis and should be assessed in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Chauveau
- Department of Pathology, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Antoine Garric
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation Dialysis, Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sylvaine Di Tommaso
- University of Bordeaux, Oncoprot Platform, TBM-Core US 005, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM UMR1312, BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (BRIC), 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne-Aurélie Raymond
- University of Bordeaux, Oncoprot Platform, TBM-Core US 005, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM UMR1312, BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (BRIC), 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jonathan Visentin
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- Laboratory of Immunology and Immunogenetics, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Agathe Vermorel
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation Dialysis, Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nathalie Dugot-Senant
- University of Bordeaux, Platform of Histopathology, TBMCore - INSERM US005 - CNRS UAR 3427, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julie Déchanet-Merville
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- INSERM U970, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- INSERM U1151, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation Dialysis, Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frédéric Saltel
- University of Bordeaux, Oncoprot Platform, TBM-Core US 005, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM UMR1312, BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (BRIC), 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation Dialysis, Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Halloran PF, Madill‐Thomsen KS, Pon S, Sikosana MLN, Böhmig GA, Bromberg J, Einecke G, Eskandary F, Gupta G, Hidalgo LG, Myslak M, Viklicky O, Perkowska‐Ptasinska A. Molecular diagnosis of ABMR with or without donor-specific antibody in kidney transplant biopsies: Differences in timing and intensity but similar mechanisms and outcomes. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1976-1991. [PMID: 35575435 PMCID: PMC9540308 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We studied the clinical, histologic, and molecular features distinguishing DSA-negative from DSA-positive molecularly defined antibody-mediated rejection (mABMR). We analyzed mABMR biopsies with available DSA assessments from the INTERCOMEX study: 148 DSA-negative versus 248 DSA-positive, compared with 864 no rejection (excluding TCMR and Mixed). DSA-positivity varied with mABMR stage: early-stage (EABMR) 56%; fully developed (FABMR) 70%; and late-stage (LABMR) 58%. DSA-negative patients with mABMR were usually sensitized, 60% being HLA antibody-positive. Compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR was more often C4d-negative; earlier by 1.5 years (average 2.4 vs. 3.9 years); and had lower ABMR activity and earlier stage in molecular and histology features. However, the top ABMR-associated transcripts were identical in DSA-negative versus DSA-positive mABMR, for example, NK-associated (e.g., KLRD1 and GZMB) and IFNG-inducible (e.g., PLA1A). Genome-wide class comparison between DSA-negative and DSA-positive mABMR showed no significant differences in transcript expression except those related to lower intensity and earlier time of DSA-negative ABMR. Three-year graft loss in DSA-negative mABMR was the same as DSA-positive mABMR, even after adjusting for ABMR stage. Thus, compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR is on average earlier, less active, and more often C4d-negative but has similar graft loss, and genome-wide analysis suggests that it involves the same mechanisms. SUMMARY SENTENCE: In 398 kidney transplant biopsies with molecular antibody-mediated rejection, the 150 DSA-negative cases are earlier, less intense, and mostly C4d-negative, but use identical molecular mechanisms and have the same risk of graft loss as the 248 DSA-positive cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F. Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics CentreEdmontonAlbertaCanada,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplant ImmunologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | | | - Shane Pon
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics CentreEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | | | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | | | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of NephrologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine IIIMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- Division of NephrologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Marek Myslak
- Department of Clinical Interventions, Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation SPWSZ HospitalPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology and Transplant CenterInstitute for Clinical and Experimental MedicinePragueCzech Republic
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Anwar IJ, Srinivas TR, Gao Q, Knechtle SJ. Shifting Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation: The Rise of Composite Endpoints and Machine Learning to Refine Prognostication. Transplantation 2022; 106:1558-1564. [PMID: 35323161 PMCID: PMC10900533 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The measurement of outcomes in kidney transplantation has been more accurately documented than almost any other surgical procedure result in recent decades. With significant improvements in short- and long-term outcomes related to optimized immunosuppression, outcomes have gradually shifted away from conventional clinical endpoints (ie, patient and graft survival) to surrogate and composite endpoints. This article reviews how outcomes measurements have evolved in the past 2 decades in the setting of increased data collection and summarizes recent advances in outcomes measurements pertaining to clinical, histopathological, and immune outcomes. Finally, we discuss the use of composite endpoints and Bayesian concepts, specifically focusing on the integrative box risk prediction score, in conjunction with machine learning to refine prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran J Anwar
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Qimeng Gao
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tiller G, Lammerts RGM, Karijosemito JJ, Alkaff FF, Diepstra A, Pol RA, Meter-Arkema AH, Seelen MA, van den Heuvel MC, Hepkema BG, Daha MR, van den Born J, Berger SP. Weak Expression of Terminal Complement in Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Kidney. Front Immunol 2022; 13:845301. [PMID: 35493506 PMCID: PMC9044906 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.845301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe role of the complement system in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is insufficiently understood. We aimed to investigate the role of local and systemic complement activation in active (aABMR). We quantified complement activation markers, C3, C3d, and C5b-9 in plasma of aABMR, and acute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR), and non-rejection kidney transplant recipients. Intra-renal complement markers were analyzed as C4d, C3d, C5b-9, and CD59 deposition. We examined in vitro complement activation and CD59 expression on renal endothelial cells upon incubation with human leukocyte antigen antibodies.MethodsWe included 50 kidney transplant recipients, who we histopathologically classified as aABMR (n=17), aTCMR (n=18), and non-rejection patients (n=15).ResultsComplement activation in plasma did not differ across groups. C3d and C4d deposition were discriminative for aABMR diagnosis. Particularly, C3d deposition was stronger in glomerular (P<0,01), and peritubular capillaries (P<0,05) comparing aABMR to aTCMR rejection and non-rejection biopsies. In contrast to C3d, C5b-9 was only mildly expressed across all groups. For C5b-9, no significant difference between aABMR and non-rejection biopsies regarding peritubular and glomerular C5b-9 deposition was evident. We replicated these findings in vitro using renal endothelial cells and found complement pathway activation with C4d and C3d, but without terminal C5b-9 deposition. Complement regulator CD59 was variably present in biopsies and constitutively expressed on renal endothelial cells in vitro.ConclusionOur results indicate that terminal complement might only play a minor role in late aABMR, possibly indicating the need to re-evaluate the applicability of terminal complement inhibitors as treatment for aABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gesa Tiller
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rosa G. M. Lammerts
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jessy J. Karijosemito
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Firas F. Alkaff
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robert A. Pol
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anita H. Meter-Arkema
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marc. A. Seelen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marius C. van den Heuvel
- Division of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G. Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Mohamed R. Daha
- Department of Nephrology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jacob van den Born
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stefan P. Berger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Stefan P. Berger,
| |
Collapse
|