Effect of the change in antiviral therapy indication on identifying significant liver injury among chronic hepatitis B virus infections in the grey zone

A state-of-the-art review of the recent advances in exosome isolation and detection methods in viral infection

Proteins, RNA, DNA, lipids, and carbohydrates are only some of the molecular components found in exosomes released by tumor cells. They play an essential role in healthy and diseased cells as messengers of short- and long-distance intercellular communication. However, since exosomes are released by every kind of cell and may be found in blood and other bodily fluids, they may one day serve as biomarkers for a wide range of disorders. In many pathological conditions, including cancer, inflammation, and infection, they play a role. It has been shown that the biogenesis of exosomes is analogous to that of viruses and that the exosomal cargo plays an essential role in the propagation, dissemination, and infection of several viruses. Bidirectional modulation of the immune response is achieved by the ability of exosomes associated with viruses to facilitate immunological escape and stimulate the body's antiviral immune response. Recently, exosomes have received a lot of interest due to their potential therapeutic use as biomarkers for viral infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and SARS-CoV-2. This article discusses the purification procedures and detection techniques for exosomes and examines the research on exosomes as a biomarker of viral infection.

Further understanding of chronic hepatitis B in the indeterminate phase or in the grey zone

The prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still facing great challenges. Even though the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (version 2022) have expanded the antiviral treatment indications, there is still a certain proportion of HBV infections that do not meet the antiviral treatment indications, known as the indeterminate phase or the gray zone (GZ). However, the current interpretation and judgment criteria for the indeterminate phase or GZ of HBV infection are not uniform, and their connections and differences are not very clear. Different studies focus on different subjects. Regardless of the identification of the indeterminate phase or GZ, the purpose is to timely and accurately determine the progression of CHB and whether timely treatment is needed. Based on the understanding that the GZ corresponds to the "classification of antiviral treatment indication" and that the indeterminate phase corresponds to the "natural history staging", this article elaborates on the further understanding of CHB in the indeterminate phase or in the GZ. This paper argues that the GZ refers to cases that do not receive treatment for not meeting the antiviral treatment indications, while the indeterminate phase refers to cases that are difficult to be clearly attributed to a natural history stage for not meeting the natural history staging criteria. Thus, the GZ should include the indeterminate phase, and they are not parallel concepts. According to the CMA guidelines (version 2022), patients in the indeterminate phase of GZ are recommended for antiviral treatment; according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines (2017), antiviral therapy is recommended for patients in the immune control phase and the indeterminate phase of GZ.

Serum HBV RNA levels among untreated adults with chronic hepatitis B in distinct immune phases and liver histopathology statuses

HBV RNA is a novel serum biomarker that reflects intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) transcription activity. Serum HBV RNA levels among treatment-naïve adults during the natural history of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and distinct liver histopathology statuses remain elusive. In our study, we include a total of 411 treatment-naïve CHB patients, among which 43 patients were HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant [IT(e+)], 84 patients were HBeAg-positive immune active [IA(e+)], 65 patients in HBeAg-negative immune active phases [IA(e-)], 149 patients were HBeAg-negative inactive phases [IC(e-)], and 70 patients were in Gray Zone (GZ). HBV RNA was measured in this cohort and its potential correlation with traditional serological markers and liver histopathology were analyzed. Our data showed that HBV RNA was strongly correlated with HBV DNA, HBeAg, HBsAg and ALT. Further subgroup analysis revealed a close correlation between HBV RNA and HBV DNA in patients in the IA (e+) and IA (e-) phases, but neither in IT(e+) nor IC(e-) phase. HBV RNA levels were consistently increased with the advanced degrees of hepatic inflammation, but not hepatic fibrosis. Of note, HBV RNA from HBeAg-positive patients negatively correlated with liver fibrosis, whereas HBV RNA from HBeAg-negative patients was weakly associated with liver inflammation. To sum up, serum HBV RNA shows a distinct profile among CHB patients in different immune statuses and hepatic histopathology stages/grades. Simultaneous testing of HBV RNA and traditional indicators might provide a comprehensive clinical assessment of CHB patients.

Chronic Hepatitis B: Treat all Who Are Viremic?

The main aim of antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to prevent disease progression and reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In general, treatment is recommended for select patient groups viewed as being at higher risk of developing adverse outcomes from CHB. However, patients who do not meet treatment criteria under current international guidelines may still benefit from antiviral therapy to reduce CHB-related complications. Moreover, well-tolerated antiviral drugs that are highly effective at suppressing viral replication are now widely available, and withholding therapy from patients with viremia is increasingly controversial. In this article, we review traditional treatment paradigms and argue the merits of expanding treatment eligibility to patients with CHB who do not meet current treatment criteria.

RDW-SD is Superior to RDW-CV in Reflecting Liver Fibrosis Stage in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Purpose

The clinical significance of the red blood cell distribution width (RDW)-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) has been recognized in numerous diseases, but few studies have investigated the usefulness of RDW-standard deviation (RDW-SD). This study aimed to compare the utility of RDW-SD and RDW-CV in evaluating liver fibrosis stage in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 720 treatment-naïve CHB patients and 578 healthy controls, and evaluated their clinical parameters. In CHB patients, the associations between RDW-CV and liver fibrosis stage were analyzed as compared to RDW-SD using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Spearman's rank correlation, student's t-test, binary logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

RDW-SD, rather than RDW-CV was significantly elevated in CHB patients compared with healthy controls. Correlation analysis showed a stronger association between RDW-SD and liver fibrosis stage than RDW-CV in CHB patients. RDW-CV and RDW-SD are both independent predictors of significant fibrosis. For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for RDW-CV was 0.599, while for RDW-SD, it was 0.706. RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR), a novel index for liver fibrosis calculated as RDW-CV/platelet, exhibited an AUC of 0.730. This AUC increased to 0.752 when RDW-CV in the RPR formula was replaced with RDW-SD. Additionally, subgroup analyses based on age, gender, and HBeAg status showed that the AUC for RDW-SD in diagnosing significant fibrosis was significantly greater than that for RDW-CV, with statistically significant differences.

Conclusion

RDW-SD showed superiority in reflecting liver fibrosis stage and diagnosing liver significant fibrosis than RDW-CV in treatment-naïve CHB patients.

Lowering the threshold of alanine aminotransferase for enhanced identification of significant hepatic injury in chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

The clinical and histological features of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fall into the "grey zone (GZ)" and do not fit into conventional natural phases are unclear.

AIM

To explore the impact of varying the threshold of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in identifying significant liver injury among GZ patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis involved a cohort of 1617 adult patients diagnosed with CHB who underwent liver biopsy. The clinical phases of CHB patients were determined based on the European Association for the Study of the Liver 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines. GZ CHB patients were classified into four groups: GZ-A (HBeAg positive, normal ALT levels, and HBV DNA ≤ 107 IU/mL), GZ-B (HBeAg positive, elevated ALT levels, and HBV DNA < 104 or > 107 IU/mL), GZ-C (HBeAg negative, normal ALT levels, and HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL), and GZ-D (HBeAg negative, elevated ALT levels, and HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/mL). Significant hepatic injury (SHI) was defined as the presence of notable liver inflammation (≥ G2) and/or significant fibrosis (≥ S2).

RESULTS

The results showed that 50.22% of patients were classified as GZ, and 63.7% of GZ patients developed SHI. The study also found that lowering the ALT treatment thresholds to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2018 treatment criteria (35 U/L for men and 25 U/L for women) can more accurately identify patients with significant liver damage in the GZ phases. In total, the proportion of patients with ALT ≤ 40 U/L who required antiviral therapy was 64.86% [(221 + 294)/794]. When we lowered the ALT treatment threshold to the new criteria (30 U/L for men and 19 U/L for women), the same outcome was revealed, and the proportion of patients with ALT ≤ 40 U/L who required antiviral therapy was 75.44% [(401 + 198)/794]. Additionally, the proportion of SHI was 49.1% in patients under 30 years old and increased to 55.3% in patients over 30 years old (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest the importance of redefining the natural phases of CHB and using new ALT treatment thresholds for better diagnosis and management of CHB patients in the GZ phases.

The Impact of the Definitions of Clinical Phases on the Profiles of Grey-Zone Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

We aim to investigate the impact of different clinical phases' definitions of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection on the profiles of grey zone, based on HBV guidelines set by the Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases (CSH/CSID, 2022 version) and guidelines set by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD, 2018 version). We retrospectively examined untreated CHB patients enrolled in the China Registry of Hepatitis B database. Patients' clinical phases were determined as per CSH/CSID and AASLD. Liver fibrosis was estimated by FIB-4 and/or APRI. Among 3462 CHB patients, 56.9% and 41.7% fell into the grey zone based on AASLD and CSH/CSID. Compared with grey zone patients as per AASLD, those under CSH/CSID guidelines showed lower levels of median ALT (26.0 vs. 37.0 U/L, p < 0.001), AST (25.0 vs. 29.4 U/L, p < 0.001) and APRI (0.3 vs. 0.4, p < 0.001), and lower rates of advanced fibrosis estimated by APRI (7.9% vs. 11.4% p = 0.001), but comparable rates by FIB-4 (13.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.389). With the stepwise lowering of ALT upper limits of normal (ULN) values from 50/40 U/L for males/females to 40/40 U/L, 35/25 U/L and 30/19 U/L, the proportions of grey zone patients as per CSH/CSID declined from 46.7% to 41.7%, 34.3% and 28.8%, respectively, whereas they remained stable (55.7%, 56.2%, 56.9% and 57.0%) as per AASLD. Compared with the AASLD guidelines, CSH/CSID guidelines leave fewer and less severe patients in the grey zone. Lowering ALT ULN values reduces the number of grey zone patients as per CSH/CSID, but not under AASLD guidelines.

Exosomal HBV-DNA for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of chronic hepatitis B

This study examined exosomal hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA levels in chronic HBV infection (CHB). Patients were grouped according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver classification (1: HBV-DNA-positive CHB, normal alanine aminotransferase [ALT]; 2: HBV-DNA-positive CHB, elevated ALT; 3: HBV-DNA-negative HBeAb-positive CHB, normal ALT; 4: HBV-DNA-positive HBeAg-negative HBeAb-positive CHB, elevated ALT; 5: HBV-DNA-negative, HBcAb-positive; 6: HBV-negative, normal ALT). Exosomes were isolated, comparative analysis of exosomes and serum HBV-DNA. The HBV-DNA content was lower in exosomes than in serum for groups 1, 2, and 4 (all P < 0.05). In the groups negative for serum HBV-DNA (groups 3 and 5), the exosomal HBV-DNA levels were higher than the serum HBV-DNA levels (all P < 0.05). The exosomal and serum HBV-DNA levels were correlated in groups 2 (R ² = 0.84) and 4 (R ² = 0.98). The exosomal HBV-DNA levels were correlated with total bilirubin (R ² = 0.94), direct bilirubin (R ² = 0.82), and indirect bilirubin (R ² = 0.81) in group 5 (all P < 0.05). In patients with CHB and negative for serum HBV-DNA, exosomal HBV-DNA was detectable and could be used to monitor the treatment effects. Exosomal HBV-DNA could be used in patients with a high suspicion of HBV infection but negative for serum HBV-DNA.