Harnessing the small intestinal axis to resolve systemic inflammation

Emerging drugs for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a focus on phase 2 and phase 3 trials

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition that affects millions of pediatric and adult patients with well-studied impact on morbidity and quality of life. Management occurs in a stepwise fashion beginning with preventative measures before immunomodulators are introduced. However, challenges remain in treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that is refractory to first- and second-line treatments and there are only few topical anti-inflammatory options, especially for pediatric patients.

AREAS COVERED

New medications are required to address these gaps as lesions may persist despite treatment or patients may discontinue treatment due to actual or anticipated adverse effects of mainstay medications. Emerging research into the pathophysiology of AD and the immune system at large has provided opportunities for novel interventions aimed at stopping AD mechanisms at new checkpoints. Clinical trials for 36 agents currently in phase 2 or phase 3 are evaluated with particular focus on the studies for, B244, CBP-201, tapinarof, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, amlitelimab, and rocatinlimab as they explore novel pathways and have some of the most promising results.

EXPERT OPINION

These clinical trials contribute to the evolution of AD treatment toward greater precision based on salient pathways with a particular focus on moderate-to-severe AD to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

A randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial of EDP1815, an oral immunomodulatory preparation of Prevotella histicola, in adults with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis

Background

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. EDP1815 is an oral, gut-restricted preparation of non-live Prevotella histicola, the first of a new immunomodulatory therapeutic class targeting the small intestine to generate systemic anti-inflammatory responses.

Objective

To evaluate safety and efficacy of EDP1815 in mild-to-moderate psoriasis in a proof-of-concept study.

Methods

A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with a 16-week treatment period and up to 24 weeks of follow-up. Participants were randomized to receive 1, 4, or 10 capsules daily.

Results

EDP1815 was well tolerated with comparable rates of treatment-emergent adverse events to placebo, and no drug-related serious adverse events. Clinically meaningful responses to EDP1815, defined as at least 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-50) at week 16, were observed in all 3 cohorts, statistically significant in the 1-capsule (29.7%; P = 0.048) and 4-capsule (31.9%; P = 0.022) groups, compared with placebo (12.1%). Among EDP1815-treated PASI-50 responders at week 16, 60% (18/30) maintained or improved off-treatment responses at week 40.

Limitations

Continued off-treatment improvement past 16 weeks shows potential for greater therapeutic benefit that was not assessed.

Conclusion

EDP1815 was well-tolerated with a placebo-like safety profile, and had meaningful efficacy outcomes in psoriasis, validating this novel immunomodulatory approach.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT04603027, identifier NCT04603027.

Mucositis and Infection in Hematology Patients

Survival in patients with hematological malignancies has improved over the years, both due to major developments in anticancer treatment, as well as in supportive care. Nevertheless, important and debilitating complications of intensive treatment regimens still frequently occur, including mucositis, fever and bloodstream infections. Exploring potential interacting mechanisms and directed therapies to counteract mucosal barrier injury is of the utmost importance if we are to continue to improve care for this increasingly growing patient population. In this perspective, I highlight recent advances in our understanding of the relation of mucositis and infection.

Genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer and the microbiome

In 2020, the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the World Health Organization's GLOBOCAN database ranked colorectal cancer (CRC) as the third most common cancer in the world. Most cases of CRC (> 95%) are sporadic and develop from colorectal polyps that can progress to intramucosal carcinoma and CRC. Increasing evidence is accumulating that the gut microbiota can play a key role in the initiation and progression of CRC, as well as in the treatment of CRC, acting as an important metabolic and immunological regulator. Factors that may determine the microbiota role in CRC carcinogenesis include inflammation, changes in intestinal stem cell function, impact of bacterial metabolites on gut mucosa, accumulation of genetic mutations and other factors. In this review, I discuss the major mechanisms of the development of sporadic CRC, provide detailed characteristics of the bacteria that are most often associated with CRC, and analyze the role of the microbiome and microbial metabolites in inflammation initiation, activation of proliferative activity in intestinal epithelial and stem cells, and the development of genetic and epigenetic changes in CRC. I consider long-term studies in this direction to be very important, as they open up new opportunities for the treatment and prevention of CRC.