Sirolimus Monotherapy for Thrombocytopenia in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Pilot Study From a Tertiary Referral Center

The mTOR pathway in the antiphospholipid syndrome

This perspective discussed the available evidence on the involvement of mTOR pathway in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), from the aspects of endothelial cells, platelets, monocytes and anti-phospholipid antibodies (PLs), which may lead to future therapeutic applications of mTOR inhibition in APS.

Optimizing the therapeutic window of sirolimus by monitoring blood concentration for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia

Previous studies have demonstrated that sirolimus (SRL) is an effective agent for the treatment of refractory/relapsed (R/R) ITP. However, the therapeutic window of sirolimus in the treatment of ITP has not been established. As the toxicity of sirolimus increases with higher blood concentrations, it is crucial to determine the optimal therapeutic concentration of SRL for the treatment of ITP. Thus, in this study, we used a retrospective cohort of ITP patients treated with sirolimus to propose the therapeutic dosage window for sirolimus. A total of 275 laboratory results of SRL blood concentration from 63 ITP patients treated with SRL were analyzed retrospectively. The ITP patients were divided into five groups based on their SRL blood concentration: 0-4 ng/ml, 4-8 ng/ml, 8-12 ng/ml, 12-16 ng/ml and ≥16 ng/ml. In addition to the SRL blood concentration, platelet counts and adverse events that occurred during the first 6 weeks of SRL treatment were analyzed. These findings were then used to establish the decision matrix tables and ROC curves, which helped identify the therapeutic window of SRL. Based on the values and trends of true-positive rate (TPR) and false-positive rate (FPR) in the ROC curve, patients who achieved a SRL blood concentration of 4-12 ng/ml displayed a higher response rate compared to those with a SRL concentration of 0-4 ng/ml or ≥16ng/ml. Additionally, the response rate was better for patients with a SRL concentration of 8-12 ng/ml compared to 4-8 ng/ml. Adverse events were related to the concentration of SRL; however, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the concentrations of 4-8 ng/ml and 8-12 ng/ml (P > .05). Regression analysis suggested that the concentration of SRL correlated with the patient's age, PLT count at the start of SRL administration, and the dose of SRL. It is suggested that the optimal blood concentration of SRL monotherapy for managing ITP is 8-12 ng/ml. This range may achieve a favorable balance between clinical efficacy and the severity of adverse events.

Tacrolimus shows adequate efficacy in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies associated thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study

Thrombocytopenia is a common manifestation associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus treatment in aPL associated thrombocytopenia. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients who had persistent positive aPL and thrombocytopenia that was treated with tacrolimus were included. A total of 49 patients [38 females (77.6%)] were enrolled from Nov 2013 to Apr 2022 with a median treatment duration of 22 months. Seventeen fulfilled classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 18 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The median age of study patients was 37 years (IQR 31, 48). Forty-three (87.8%) patients were on concomitant use of glucocorticoids, 6 on tacrolimus monotherapy. The overall response rate in this cohort was 85.7% (n = 42), including 49% of complete responses (n = 24). The median time to achieve a response was 3 months. Nine (18.4%) patients with overall response experienced a loss of response. The response rate during follow-up in patients with monotherapy was noninferior. Patients with positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) showed the tendency of maintaining response (p = 0.028). The 19 patients who were on medium and high dosage of glucocorticoids (> 15 mg prednisone/d) managed to taper glucocorticoids rapidly. Side effects were reported in 12.2% (n = 6) of the patients (elevated creatinine, general malaise, elevated liver enzyme). Tacrolimus has adequate efficacy, steroid-sparing effect and is well tolerated for aPL associated thrombocytopenia. Patients with positive ANA might benefit the most from tacrolimus treatment.

Real-life use of mTOR inhibitor-based therapy in adults with autoimmune cytopenia highlights strong efficacy in relapsing/refractory multi-lineage autoimmune cytopenia

Data on mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) in autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), in adults are scarce. We retrospectively analysed 30 cases of refractory or relapsing AIC treated with an mTORi-based therapy. Eleven warm autoimmune hemolytic anaemia, 10 autoimmune thrombocytopenia, 6 acquired pure red cell aplasia, 3 autoimmune neutropenia were included. Twenty were multilineage AIC (67%) and 21 were secondary AIC (70%). mTORi were associated with other therapies in 23 AIC (77%). Twenty-two AIC (73%) responded to mTORi-based therapy: 5 reached a partial response (17%) and 17 a complete response (57%). Survival without unfavourable outcome (failure, requirement of a new therapy, or death) was longer in multilineage AIC compared to single-lineage AIC (p = 0.049) with a median event-free survival of 48 versus 12 months. Median event-free survival was 48 months in secondary AIC and 33 months in primary AIC (p = 0.79). mTORi were discontinued in 4 patients (15%) for safety reasons and in 3 patients for patient's choice (12%). In conclusion, mTORi could be considered as an alternative or an add-on therapy in refractory or relapsing AIC in adult patients, especially in multilineage AIC.

Combined therapy of prednisone and mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for treating retroperitoneal fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare autoimmune disease with fibrous tissue growth and inflammation in retroperitoneum. Its current treatments involve long-term uptake of glucocorticoids (e.g., prednisone) for controlling inflammation; however, side effects are common. We strived for an improved therapy for fibrosis remission while reducing side effects.

METHODS

We surveyed gene-disease-drug databases and discovered that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) was a key signalling protein in RPF and the mTOR inhibitor compound sirolimus affected many RPF pathways. We designed a therapy combining a gradual reduction of prednisone with a long-term, stable dosage of sirolimus. We then implemented a single-arm clinical trial and assessed the effects in eight RPF patients at 0, 12 and 48 weeks of treatment by measuring fibrous tissue mass by CT, markers of inflammation and kidney functions by lab tests, immune cell profiles by flow cytometry and plasma inflammatory proteins by Olink proteomics.

RESULTS

With the combined therapy, fibrous tissue shrunk about by half, markers of acute inflammation reduced by 70% and most patients with abnormal kidney functions had them restored to normal range. Molecularly, fibrosis-related T cell subsets, including TH2, TH17 and circulating TFH cells, were reduced and tumour necrosis factor and related cytokines restored to healthy levels. No severe long-term side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our combined therapy resulted in significant fibrosis remission and an overall regression of the immune system towards healthy states, while achieving good tolerance. We concluded that this new therapy had the potential to replace the steroid monotherapy for treating RPF.

Safety of Sirolimus in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex under Two Years of Age-A Bicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

mTOR inhibitors are a novel pharmacotherapy recommended for subependymal giant astrocytomas, refractory epilepsy, and the treatment of the other clinical manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Clinical trials on everolimus proved it to be effective and safe in children. Despite its common use in clinical practice, the research on sirolimus is limited. This study is the first to determine and assess the severity of the adverse effects (AEs) of sirolimus administered to children with TSC under two years of age.

METHODS

We performed a bicenter retrospective data analysis of medical records of individuals with TSC who initiated therapy with sirolimus under the age of two.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in the study. At least one AE was reported in all participants. The most prevalent AEs were anemia, thrombocytosis, and hyperlipidemia. Infections and mouth ulcerations, often reported in the studies on older patients, were infrequent and of mild or moderate grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse effects associated with sirolimus use in infants and young children with TSC are frequent yet not life- or health-threatening. Further multicenter prospective clinical trials should determine the long-term safety of sirolimus.