Novel Insights Into the Immune-Regulatory Functions of Mast Cells in the Cutaneous Immune Response

New insight into the agonism of protease-activated receptors as an immunotherapeutic strategy

The activation and mobilization of immune cells play a crucial role in immunotherapy. Existing therapeutic interventions, such as cytokines administration, aim to enhance immune cell activity. However, these approaches usually result in modest effectiveness and toxic side effects, thereby restricting their clinical application. Protease-activated receptors (PARs), a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, actively participate in the immune system by directly activating immune cells. The activation of PARs by proteases or synthetic ligands can modulate immune cell behavior, signaling, and responses to treat immune-related diseases, suggesting the significance of PARs agonism in immunotherapy. However, the agonism of PARs in therapeutical applications remains rarely discussed, since it has been traditionally considered that PARs activation facilitates disease progressions. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the activation, rather than inhibition, of PARs in immune-related physiological responses and diseases. Additionally, we will discuss the emerging immunotherapeutic potential of PARs agonism, providing a new strategic direction for PARs-mediated immunotherapy.

Mast cells in type 2 skin inflammation: Maintenance and function

Mast cells (MCs) are immune cells residing in tissues and playing indispensable roles in maintaining homeostasis and inflammatory states. Skin lesions associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) and type 2 skin inflammation display an increment in MCs, which have both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects. The direct and indirect activations of skin MCs by environmental factors such as Staphylococcus aureus can instigate type 2 skin inflammation in AD with poorly understood mechanisms. Furthermore, both IgE-dependent and -independent degranulation of MCs contribute to pruritus in AD. Conversely, MCs suppress type 2 skin inflammation by promoting Treg expansion through IL-2 secretion in the spleen. Moreover, skin MCs can upregulate gene expression involved in skin barrier function, thus mitigating AD-like inflammation. These functional variances of MCs in AD could stem from differences in experimental systems, their localization, and origins. In this review, we will focus on how MCs are maintained in the skin under homeostatic and inflammatory conditions, and how they are involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 skin inflammation.

Exploring the roles of prostanoids, leukotriens, and dietary fatty acids in cutaneous inflammatory diseases: Insights from pharmacological and genetic approaches

Prostanoids and leukotrienes (LTs) are representative of ω6 fatty acid-derived metabolites that exert their actions through specific receptors on the cell surface. These lipid mediators, being unstable in vivo, act locally at their production sites; thus, their physiological functions remain unclear. However, recent pharmacological and genetic approaches using experimental murine models have provided significant insights into the roles of these lipid mediators in various pathophysiological conditions, including cutaneous inflammatory diseases. These lipid mediators act not only through signaling by themselves but also by potentiating the signaling of other chemical mediators, such as cytokines and chemokines. For instance, prostaglandin E2 -EP4 and LTB4 -BLT1 signaling on cutaneous dendritic cells substantially facilitate their chemokine-induced migration ability into the skin and play critical roles in the priming and/or activation of antigen-specific effector T cells in the skin. In addition to these ω6 fatty acid-derived metabolites, various ω3 fatty acid-derived metabolites regulate skin immune cell functions, and some exert potent anti-inflammatory functions. Lipid mediators act as modulators of cutaneous immune responses, and manipulating the signaling from lipid mediators has the potential as a novel therapeutic approach for human skin diseases.

Immune regulation and prognosis indicating ability of a newly constructed multi-genes containing signature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal malignancy, although newly developing targeted therapy and immunotherapy have been showing promising effects in clinical treatment, the effective biomarkers for immune response prediction are still lacking. The study is to construct a gene signature according to ccRCC immune cells infiltration landscape, thus aiding clinical prediction of patients response to immunotherapy.

METHODS

Firstly, ccRCC transcriptome expression profiles from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database as well as immune related genes information from IMMPORT database were combine applied to identify the differently expressed meanwhile immune related candidate genes in ccRCC comparing to normal control samples. Then, based on protein-protein interaction network (PPI) and following module analysis of the candidate genes, a hub gene cluster was further identified for survival analysis. Further, LASSO analysis was applied to construct a signature which was in succession assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival, Cox regression and ROC curve analysis. Moreover, ccRCC patients were divided as high and low-risk groups based on the gene signature followed by the difference estimation of immune treatment response and exploration of related immune cells infiltration by TIDE and Cibersort analysis respectively among the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

Based on GEO and IMMPORT databases, a total of 269 differently expressed meanwhile immune related genes in ccRCC were identified, further PPI network and module analysis of the 269 genes highlighted a 46 genes cluster. Next step, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of the 46 genes identified 4 genes that were supported to be independent prognosis indicators, and a gene signature was constructed based on the 4 genes. Furthermore, after assessing its prognosis indicating ability by both Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis, immune relation of the signature was evaluated including its association with environment immune score, Immune checkpoint inhibitors expression as well as immune cells infiltration. Together, immune predicting ability of the signature was preliminary explored.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on ccRCC genes expression profiles and multiple bioinformatic analysis, a 4 genes containing signature was constructed and the immune regulation of the signature was preliminary explored. Although more detailed experiments and clinical trials are needed before potential clinical use of the signature, the results shall provide meaningful insight into further ccRCC immune researches.