1
|
Kuncman Ł, Pajdziński M, Smółka K, Bilski M, Socha J, Stando R, Peszyńska-Piorun M, Korab K, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Fijuth J. Early lymphocyte levels and low doses radiation exposure of lung predict lymphopenia in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1426635. [PMID: 39148729 PMCID: PMC11324483 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1426635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiation induced lymphopenia (RIL) deteriorate survival and diminishes the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combined treatment of lung cancer. Given the inconsistent data across various studies on the predictors of RIL, we aim to methodically elucidate these predictors and formulate a practical guide for clinicians. Methods We conducted observational cohort study in four tertiary cancer centers. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, without lymphopenia grade >1, who underwent standalone radiotherapy (RT) in minimum 15 fractions were eligible. Dose-volume parameters of structures and clinical factors were comprehensively analyzed using various predictors selection methods and statistical models (Linear Regressors, Elastic Net, Bayesian Regressors, Huber Regression, regression based on k-nearest neighbors, Gaussian Process Regressor, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Automated Machine Learning) and were ranked to predict lymphocytes count nadir (alc_nadir). Results Two hundred thirty eight patients (stage I-3.4%, II-17.6%, III-75.2%, IV-3.8%) who underwent RT to median dose of 60 Gy were analyzed. Median alc_nadir was 0.68K/mm3. The 60 feature sets were evaluated in 600 models (RMSE 0.27-0.41K/mm³). The most important features were baseline lymphocyte count (alc_1), mean lung_dose, lung v05, lung v10, heart v05 and effective dose to immune cells (edic). In patients with alc_1 ≤ 2.005K/mm3, median alc_nadir predictions were 0.54K/mm3 for lung_v05p > 51.8% and 0.76K/mm3 for lung_v05p ≤ 51.8%. Lymphopenia was rare in patients with alc_1 > 2.005K/mm3. Discussion RIL was most severe in patients with low early lymphocyte counts, primarily triggered by low RT doses in the heart and lungs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Kuncman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Lodz, Poland
| | - Matusz Pajdziński
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Lodz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Smółka
- Institute of Mechatronics and Information Systems, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland
| | - Mateusz Bilski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Brachytherapy, Lublin Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lublin Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
| | - Joanna Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Center, Czestochowa, Poland
| | - Rafał Stando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland
| | - Magdalena Peszyńska-Piorun
- Radiotherapy Planning Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Lodz, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Korab
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lublin Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacek Fijuth
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iocolano M, Yegya-Raman N, Friedes C, Wang X, Kegelman T, Lee SH, Duan L, Li B, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Konski A, Langer CJ, Cohen RB, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Doucette A, Xiao Y, Kevin Teo BK, O'Reilly S, Zou W, Bradley JD, Simone CB, Feigenberg SJ. Acute hospitalizations after proton therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the durvalumab era. Cancer 2024; 130:2031-2041. [PMID: 38294959 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It was hypothesized that use of proton beam therapy (PBT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation and consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated between October 2017 and December 2021 with concurrent chemoradiation with either IMRT or PBT ± consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition were retrospectively identified. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of radiation therapy technique with 90-day hospitalization and grade 3 (G3+) lymphopenia. Competing risk regression was used to compare G3+ pneumonitis, G3+ esophagitis, and G3+ cardiac events. Kaplan-Meier method was used for progression-free survival and overall survival. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to adjust for differences in PBT and IMRT groups. RESULTS Of 316 patients, 117 (37%) received PBT and 199 (63%) received IMRT. The PBT group was older (p < .001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (p = .02). The PBT group received a lower mean heart dose (p < .0001), left anterior descending artery V15 Gy (p = .001), mean lung dose (p = .008), and effective dose to immune circulating cells (p < .001). On inverse probability treatment weighting analysis, PBT was associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; p = .002) and less G3+ lymphopenia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; p = .003). There was no difference in other G3+ toxicities, progression-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS PBT is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations, lower effective dose to immune circulating cells and less G3+ lymphopenia compared with IMRT. Minimizing dose to lymphocytes may be warranted, but prospective data are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Xingmei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Kegelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Delaware Radiation Oncology Associates, Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lian Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bolin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andre Konski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shannon O'Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang S, Chen Z, Ling J, Feng Y, Xie Y, Liu X, Hu C, Hou T. Nomograms based on the lymphocyte-albumin-neutrophil ratio (LANR) for predicting the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after definitive radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5388. [PMID: 38443675 PMCID: PMC10915143 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56043-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Much evidence has accumulated to show that inflammation and nutritional status are associated with the prognosis of patients with various cancers. The present study was designed to explore the prognostic role of the LANR in NPC patients receiving definitive radiotherapy and to construct a nomogram for predicting patient survival. This study retrospectively reviewed 805 NPC patients (604 in the training cohort and 201 in the validation cohort) who received definitive radiotherapy between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical data and pretreatment laboratory test data, including lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, and serum ALB concentration, were collected for all patients. The LANR was calculated as the albumin × lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio. Patients in the training cohort and validation cohort were categorized into high-LANR and low-LANR groups according to the corresponding cutoff values. The independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a nomogram was subsequently constructed. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. A low LANR (< 14.3) was independently associated with worse OS, PFS and MFS in NPC patients. A prognostic prediction nomogram was established based on T stage, N stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, treatment modality, and LANR and was validated. The C-indices of the nomograms for OS and PFS in the training cohort were 0.729 and 0.72, respectively. The C-indices of the nomograms for OS and PFS in the validation cohort were 0.694 and 0.695, respectively. The calibration curve revealed good consistency between the actual survival and the nomogram prediction. Patients with NPC with low pretreatment LANR had a poor prognosis. The nomogram established on the basis of the LANR was efficient and clinically useful for predicting survival in NPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujuan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Zui Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Jie Ling
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Yuhua Feng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Yangchun Xie
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Xianling Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Chunhong Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Tao Hou
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|