An ex vivo test to investigate genetic factors conferring susceptibility to atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome

Complement Biosensors Identify a Classical Pathway Stimulus in Complement-Mediated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Complement-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome (CM-HUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by germline variants or acquired antibodies to complement proteins and regulators. Building upon our prior experience with the modified Ham (mHam) assay for ex vivo diagnosis of complementopathies, we have developed an array of cell-based complement "biosensors'' by selective removal of complement regulatory proteins (CD55 and CD59, CD46, or a combination thereof) in an autonomously bioluminescent HEK293 cell line. These biosensors can be used as a sensitive method for diagnosing CM-HUS and monitoring therapeutic complement blockade. Using specific complement pathway inhibitors, this model identifies IgM-driven classical pathway stimulus during both acute disease and in many patients during clinical remission. This provides a potential explanation for ~50% of CM-HUS patients who lack an alternative pathway "driving" variant and suggests at least a subset of CM-HUS is characterized by a breakdown of IgM immunologic tolerance.

Key Points

CM-HUS has a CP stimulus driven by polyreactive IgM, addressing the mystery of why 40% of CM-HUS lack complement specific variantsComplement biosensors and the bioluminescent mHam can be used to aid in diagnosis of CM-HUS and monitor complement inhibitor therapy.

Ex Vivo Test of Complement Dysregulation in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Kidney Transplant patients: A Pilot Study

Introduction

In 2014, a complement assay, which evaluates C5b-9 deposition on endothelial cells, was proposed as a biomarker for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Early diagnosis and/or prediction of aHUS (relapse) is pivotal in aHUS kidney transplant recipients who do not receive eculizumab prophylaxis.

Methods

In this pilot study, serum samples of transplanted patients with aHUS in remission without eculizumab and patients with other primary kidney diseases (controls) were blinded and evaluated in the complement assay.

Results

We included 13 patients with aHUS (4 males, 9 females) of median age of 54 years (range: 35-69) and median of 5.9 years (range: 0.25-14.1) after transplantation; and 13 controls (7 males, 6 females) of median age of 42 years (range: 27-60) and median of 5.8 years (range: 1.6-11.7) after transplantation. There were no significant differences in C5b-9 deposits between patients with aHUS and controls on resting cells (median of 136% [range: 93%-382%] and 121% [range: 75%-200%], respectively) and activated cells (median of 196% [range: 99%-388%] and 170% [range: 113%-260%], respectively). Three patients with aHUS and 4 controls showed elevated C5b-9 deposits on resting cells, which should correspond to active aHUS. None of these patients had laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). During follow-up (15.8 months, range: 6-21), estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable in all. In 5 patients with aHUS with a genetic variant, no increase in C5b-9 deposits was found on activated endothelial cells, which contrasts with the literature suggesting that the test should identify carriers of a genetic variant.

Conclusion

Our data question the routine use of the ex vivo complement assay in kidney transplant patients. Future studies should evaluate the test characteristics of assay in kidney transplant patients.

Genetic investigation of Nordic patients with complement-mediated kidney diseases

Background

Complement activation in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), C3 glomerulonephropathy (C3G) and immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) may be associated with rare genetic variants. Here we describe gene variants in the Swedish and Norwegian populations.

Methods

Patients with these diagnoses (N=141) were referred for genetic screening. Sanger or next-generation sequencing were performed to identify genetic variants in 16 genes associated with these conditions. Nonsynonymous genetic variants are described when they have a minor allele frequency of <1% or were previously reported as being disease-associated.

Results

In patients with aHUS (n=94, one also had IC-MPGN) 68 different genetic variants or deletions were identified in 60 patients, of which 18 were novel. Thirty-two patients had more than one genetic variant. In patients with C3G (n=40) 29 genetic variants, deletions or duplications were identified in 15 patients, of which 9 were novel. Eight patients had more than one variant. In patients with IC-MPGN (n=7) five genetic variants were identified in five patients. Factor H variants were the most frequent in aHUS and C3 variants in C3G. Seventeen variants occurred in more than one condition.

Conclusion

Genetic screening of patients with aHUS, C3G and IC-MPGN is of paramount importance for diagnostics and treatment. In this study, we describe genetic assessment of Nordic patients in which 26 novel variants were found.