Case report: Schnitzler-like syndrome without monoclonal gammopathy

Neutrophilic epitheliotropism, proposed as an auto-inflammatory condition of neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis including Schnitzler syndrome, is also observed in Japanese cases

Schnitzler syndrome (SchS) is a rare autoinflammatory disease characterized by bone pain, recurrent fever, leukocytosis, and elevated C-reactive protein, along with an urticaria-like rash and monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)M or IgG gammopathy. Notably, the condition is distinguished by a relatively persistent recurrent urticarial-like rash. Histopathological features observed in the skin comprise diffuse neutrophil infiltration into the dermis, absence of dermal edema, and vascular wall degeneration, all of which classify SchS as a neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis (NUD). Accumulated histological data from skin biopsies of patients with NUD have revealed a sensitive histopathological marker for NUD, acknowledged as neutrophilic epitheliotropism, which has been proposed as reflecting an autoinflammatory condition. In this report, we present three SchS patients: two men (ages 55 and 68) and a woman (age 75), all displaying neutrophilic epitheliotropism in their skin biopsy specimens. Additionally, a review of eight previously reported SchS cases in Japan identified neutrophilic epithliotropism in five cases. These findings suggest that the inclination of neutrophils toward the epithelial tissue could aid in confirming diagnoses of NUD in most cases that need to be differentiated from conventional urticaria. Consequently, we emphasize that acknowledging neutrophilic epithelial predilection as a hallmark of NUD is critical for expediting early diagnosis and appropriate treatment for SchS.

Proposal of a new clinical entity: Paraprotein negative IL-1 mediated inflammatory dermatosis (PANID) that may precede Schnitzler syndrome

Schnitzler syndrome (SchS) is an autoinflammatory disease that is defined by the presence of 2 obligate criteria; an IgM or IgG monoclonal paraprotein and a chronic urticarial rash. Typically, there is an excellent clinical response to IL-1 antagonism. There are reports in the literature of a variant type of SchS that does not fulfil the 2 obligate criteria but responds to IL-1 blockade. Equally, there are reports of an urticarial rash preceding the development of a paraprotein by several years. We describe 3 cases in this manuscript. The first fits the Strasbourg diagnostic criteria of SchS, Simon and Asli (2013); however, with several decades of diagnostic delay. The second case at initial presentation did not fit the major criteria for SchS; however, later developed a monoclonal IgM. Finally we report, a third case that has not yet been confirmed to have a monoclonal IgM/IgG at the time of writing despite 12 years of symptoms and in whom a somatic autoinflammatory disorder remains within the differential. All cases responded strikingly to anakinra, an IL-1 receptor blocker. We propose a new clinical entity, paraprotein negative IL-1 mediated inflammatory dermatosis (PANID), that may act as a precursor or risk factor for the development of SchS or other autoinflammatory conditions.