1
|
Loricera J, Tofade T, Prieto-Peña D, Romero-Yuste S, de Miguel E, Riveros-Frutos A, Ferraz-Amaro I, Labrador E, Maiz O, Becerra E, Narváez J, Galíndez-Agirregoikoa E, González-Fernández I, Urruticoechea-Arana A, Ramos-Calvo Á, López-Gutiérrez F, Castañeda S, Unizony S, Blanco R. Effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors in relapsing giant cell arteritis in real-world clinical practice and review of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther 2024; 26:116. [PMID: 38840219 PMCID: PMC11151571 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial proportion of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) relapse despite standard therapy with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and tocilizumab. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of GCA and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) could be a therapeutic alternative. We evaluated the effectiveness of JAKi in relapsing GCA patients in a real-world setting and reviewed available literature. METHODS Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with JAKi for relapsing disease at thirteen centers in Spain and one center in United States (01/2017-12/2022). Outcomes assessed included clinical remission, complete remission and safety. Clinical remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms regardless of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Complete remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms along with normal ESR and CRP values. A systematic literature search for other JAKi-treated GCA cases was conducted. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (86% females, mean age 72.3) with relapsing GCA received JAKi therapy (baricitinib, n = 15; tofacitinib, n = 10; upadacitinib, n = 10). Before JAKi therapy, 22 (63%) patients had received conventional synthetic immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), and 30 (86%) biologics (e.g., tocilizumab). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 11 (6-15.5) months, 20 (57%) patients achieved and maintained clinical remission, 16 (46%) patients achieved and maintained complete remission, and 15 (43%) patients discontinued the initial JAKi due to relapse (n = 11 [31%]) or serious adverse events (n = 4 [11%]). A literature search identified another 36 JAKi-treated GCA cases with clinical improvement reported for the majority of them. CONCLUSIONS This real-world analysis and literature review suggest that JAKi could be effective in GCA, including in patients failing established glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab and methotrexate. A phase III randomized controlled trial of upadacitinib is currently ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03725202).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Loricera
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, ES- 39008, Spain
| | - Toluwalase Tofade
- Neurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana Prieto-Peña
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, ES- 39008, Spain
| | - Susana Romero-Yuste
- Department of Rheumatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Eugenio de Miguel
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anne Riveros-Frutos
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Iván Ferraz-Amaro
- Department of Rheumatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Olga Maiz
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Donosti, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Elena Becerra
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Elda, Alicante, Spain
| | - Javier Narváez
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Ángel Ramos-Calvo
- Department of Rheumatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Soria, Soria, Spain
| | - Fernando López-Gutiérrez
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, ES- 39008, Spain
| | - Santos Castañeda
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sebastian Unizony
- Vasculitis and Glomerulonephritis Center, Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Ricardo Blanco
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIVAL, Immunopathology Group, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, ES- 39008, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nageswaran P, Ahmed S, Tahir H. Review of phase 2/3 trials in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2024; 29:5-17. [PMID: 38180809 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2024.2303093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GCA (giant cell arteritis) and PMR (polymyalgia rheumatica) are two overlapping inflammatory rheumatic conditions that are seen exclusively in older adults, sharing some common features. GCA is a clinical syndrome characterized by inflammation of the medium and large arteries, with both cranial and extracranial symptoms. PMR is a clinical syndrome characterized by stiffness in the neck, shoulder, and pelvic girdle muscles. Both are associated with constitutional symptoms. AREAS COVERED In this review, we assess the established and upcoming treatments for GCA and PMR. We review the current treatment landscape, completed trials, and upcoming trials in these conditions, to identify new and promising therapies. EXPERT OPINION Early use of glucocorticoids (GC) remains integral to the immediate management of PMR and GCA but being aware of patient co-morbidities that may influence treatment toxicity is paramount. As such GC sparing agents are required in the treatment of PMR. Currently there are limited treatment options available for PMR and GCA, and significant unmet needs remain. Newer mechanisms of action, and hence therapeutic options being studied include CD4 T cell co-stimulation blockade, IL-17 inhibition, IL-12/23 inhibition, GM-CSF inhibition, IL-1β inhibition, TNF-α antagonist and Jak inhibition, among others, which will be discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saad Ahmed
- Department of Rheumatology, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK
| | - Hasan Tahir
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kraev K, Geneva-Popova MG, Hristov BK, Uchikov PA, Belova-Popova SD, Kraeva MI, Basheva-Kraeva YM, Stoyanova NS, Mitkova-Hristova VT, Koleva-Ivanova MS, Taneva DI, Ivanov AS. Examining the Safety Profile of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Management of Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2244. [PMID: 38137845 PMCID: PMC10744491 DOI: 10.3390/life13122244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have heralded a paradigm shift in the management of immune-mediated diseases. While their efficacy is well-established, the safety concerns associated with these agents, particularly regarding thromboembolic events (TE), remain a focus of extensive research and clinical scrutiny. This comprehensive literature review embarks on an exploration of the multifaceted landscape of JAK inhibitors, providing insights into their safety profiles across diverse immune-mediated diseases. The introduction highlights the transformative influence of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. Historically, the therapeutic arsenal for these conditions included corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologics. The advent of JAK inhibitors has revolutionized this landscape, although concerns about their safety persist. This review strives to comprehensively evaluate their safety, amalgamating knowledge from multiple studies and trials. The subsequent sections delve into the safety of specific JAK inhibitors in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and dermatologic conditions and their associations with venous thromboembolism. The evolving understanding of TE risk, particularly the intricate relationship between these agents and immune-mediated diseases, is meticulously unravelled. The concluding remarks underscore the dynamic nature of TE risk assessment with regard to immune-mediated diseases involving JAK inhibitors. It underscores that risk assessment is multifactorial, influenced not only by the choice of JAK inhibitor but also by the nuances of the underlying immune-mediated disease and the unique patient characteristics. This review offers a holistic perspective on TE risks associated with JAK inhibitors and contributes to the ongoing dialogue regarding their safety in the realm of immune-mediated diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krasimir Kraev
- Department of Propedeutics of Internal Diseases, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | - Bozhidar Krasimirov Hristov
- Second Department of Internal Diseases, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 6000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Petar Angelov Uchikov
- Department of Special Surgery, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 6000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | - Maria Ilieva Kraeva
- Department of Otorhynolaryngology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 6000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Yordanka Mincheva Basheva-Kraeva
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, University Eye Clinic, University Hospital, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Nina Staneva Stoyanova
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, University Eye Clinic, University Hospital, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Vesela Todorova Mitkova-Hristova
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, University Eye Clinic, University Hospital, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Stoyanova Koleva-Ivanova
- Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Daniela Ivova Taneva
- Department of Nursing Care, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Atanas Slavchev Ivanov
- Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|