Can immunotherapy reinforce chemotherapy efficacy? a new perspective on colorectal cancer treatment

Evaluation of fruquintinib's efficacy and safety in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a significant cause of mortality despite advancements in treatments. Fruquintinib, a potent VEGFR inhibitor, has shown promise as an advanced therapy for mCRC. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib compared to placebo in patients with refractory mCRC, focusing on Phase II and III trials.

METHOD

This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed using PubMed, EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The analysis of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety was pooled using hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) in RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Three RCTs comprising 1,178 patients were included. Fruquintinib significantly improved OS (HR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.57-0.76) and PFS (HR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.26-0.35) compared to placebo. ORR (RR: 5.91; 95% CI 1.09-32.16) and DCR (RR: 3.83; 95% CI 3.00-4.90) were also higher with fruquintinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more frequent with fruquintinib (RR: 1.31; 95% CI 1.02-1.70). No significant difference was observed in serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Fruquintinib significantly improves survival and tumor response in patients with refractory mCRC. While associated with an increased risk of high-grade adverse events, fruquintinib remains a viable and relatively safe treatment option for mCRC patients. Further studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety across diverse populations.

Evaluation of peripheral blood inflammation indexes as prognostic markers for colorectal cancer metastasis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral blood inflammation indexes in patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC) and to establish a predictive scoring system. A total of 324 CRC patients diagnosed through pathological examination from January 2017 to July 2022 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were included. The prognosis of patients with metastatic CRC was examined, and the correlation between IL-10 expression in pathological tissues and IL-10 expression in serum was analyzed. The results showed that the prognosis of CRC was poorer when metastasis occurred (P < 0.001). Additionally, IL-10 was highly expressed in the metastatic CRC group (P = 0.018), and the expression of IL-10 in pathological tissues of patients with metastatic CRC was positively correlated with the expression of IL-10 in serum (P = 0.037). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were calculated and determined by ROC curve. The critical values were 2.135, 3.735, 353.745, 0.265, 1.025, 52.975, 353.635, and 11.25, respectively. Inflammatory indexes with an AUC of more than 0.6 were selected, and each colorectal cancer patient with any of these risk factors was assigned a score of one. The 324 patients were then divided into two groups: 0-4 for the low-risk group and 4-8 for the high-risk group. The occurrence of distant metastases in the two groups was statistically analyzed. The results showed that the OS and PFS of the low-risk group were significantly superior to those of the high-risk group (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that NLR, LWR, AISI, MLR, SIRI, PNI, ALI, and IL-10 are risk factors for distant metastasis in CRC patients. Therefore, the prediction scores of these indexes can be used to effectively evaluate the prognosis of patients with metastatic CRC.

Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second most lethal cancer in the world. The main cause of the disease is due to dietary and behavioral factors. The treatment of this complex disease is mainly based on traditional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Due to its high prevalence and high morbidity, more effective treatments with fewer side effects are urgently needed. In recent years, immunotherapy has become a potential therapeutic alternative and one of the fastest-developing treatments. Immunotherapy inhibits tumor growth by activating or enhancing the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. This review presents the latest immunotherapies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, cell therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and oncolytic viruses. Some of these have shown promising results in clinical trials and are used in clinical treatment.

Redefining the battle against colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of emerging immunotherapies and their clinical efficacy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally and presents a significant challenge owing to its high mortality rate and the limitations of traditional treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. While these treatments are foundational, they are often poorly effective owing to tumor resistance. Immunotherapy is a groundbreaking alternative that has recently emerged and offers new hope for success by exploiting the body's own immune system. This article aims to provide an extensive review of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of various immunotherapies, including CRC vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss combining CRC vaccines with monoclonal antibodies, delve into preclinical studies of novel cancer vaccines, and assess the impact of these treatment methods on patient outcomes. This review seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the current state of CRC treatment by evaluating innovative treatments and their potential to redefine the prognosis of patients with CRC.