Systemic Bone Density at Disease Onset Is Associated With Joint Erosion Progression in Early Naive to Treatment Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective 12-Month Follow-Up Open-Label Study

A Clinical Evaluation of the Role of Autoimmunity in the Relation Between Erosions and Bone Mineral Density in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background/objectives: Both erosions and osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have common mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between erosion and bone mineral density (BMD) in RA and whether it can be driven by autoimmunity. Methods: Patients fulfilling the ACR 1987- or ACR/EULAR 2010-criteriae for RA. performed radiographs (erosions evaluated by the modified Sharp/van der Heidje erosion score) and biology for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs), rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) at intervals of less than 2 years from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for BMD assessment. Results: A total of 149 patients were included, (75.8% women, mean age of 62 y.o (SD 9.61) and a median disease duration of 132 months [60; 240]). A total of 61.1% patients were ACPA positive, 79.9% were erosive and 10.7% had a hip or spine T-score ≤ -2.5. A higher erosion score was associated with a lower BMD (value: -0.222; p = 0.009) and T-score (value -0.397; p < 0.0001) in the hip. ACPA status was associated with a higher erosion score (63.0 (53.2) vs. 45.5 (44.1) for ACPA- (p = 0.04)). ACPA titers were associated with a lower BMD in the hip (value -0.216; p = 0.01). In linear regression, erosion and BMD were still associated, but this association is not driven by ACPA status or titer. Conclusions: In RA patients, erosions and BMD are inversely associated but this relationship does not seem to be driven by autoimmunity only. However, the presence of ACPA or erosion should lead to osteoporosis screening.

Prediction models incorporating second metacarpal cortical index for osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: Externally validated machine learning models developed using data from the KURAMA cohort

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are significant concerns in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), predisposing patients to fragility fractures. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, simpler screening tools are needed. This study aims to assess the correlation between the second metacarpal cortical index (2MCI) and BMD in RA patients, and to evaluate machine learning (ML) models utilizing 2MCI and clinical parameters for predicting osteoporosis/osteopenia presence and BMD.

METHODS

Data from the KURAMA cohort (n = 302) and an external validation cohort (n = 32) were analyzed. BMD in the hip and forearm was obtained using DXA and 2MCI was calculated from plain hand X-ray. ML models were trained to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia presence and BMD using 2MCI and clinical variables and validated using external cohort.

RESULTS

2MCI correlated significantly with hip and forearm BMD. ML models incorporating 2MCI and other clinical parameters showed good performance in predicting osteoporosis/osteopenia presence and BMD. External validation demonstrated the generalizability of the models.

CONCLUSION

ML models utilizing 2MCI and clinical parameters show promise for osteoporosis screening in RA patients.

Cartilage and bone loss in premenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: Radiological and laboratory assessments

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the radiological and laboratory features of bone and cartilage losses in premenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This case-control study is the continuation of a study that was conducted on 48 women with RA and 48 matched healthy volunteers. All RA patients were previously subjected to clinical examination, disease activity assessment using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), serological tests, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measuring bone mineral density (BMD), and plain X-ray of both hands. Added to these, matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between patients and controls regarding COMP and MMP-3, being higher in patients (p < .001). COMP and MMP-3 have significant positive correlation with serum levels of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP). The original Sharp erosion score was positively correlated with the serum level of the studied antibodies and disease duration, but no significant correlation was found with either COMP, MMP-3, or DAS-28. Spine BMD and Z score were negatively correlated with disease activity and anti-CarP. There were significant positive relationhsips between indices of local cartilage and bone loss and the indices of systemic bone loss. MMP-3 had no correlation with indices of local cartilage and bone loss and disease activity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenic mechanism of hand joint damage involved the three studied autoantibodies namely, rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP and anti-CarP antibodies. Anti-CarP antibody was involved in the reduction of BMD of the spine. The association between systemic osteoporosis and hand joint damage pointed to a common pathogenic mechanism.

Factors associated with hand bone changes in early rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this research was to assess if hand bone mineral density (HBMD) changes associated with the appearance of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), compared with the population-based control group. Additionally, we tried to identify if there are novel factors that associate with HBMD and erosive changes (EC), and if they are dissimilar. The study was conducted as the data are limited.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 83 ERA patients and 321 controls. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) machine was used to measure HBMD. EC of RA (rheumatoid arthritis) were assessed in X-rays of hands using Sharp scores. Life-style habits, inflammation markers were assessed to evaluate the effects of different factors.

RESULTS

The presence of ERA was associated with lower HBMD compared with controls (adjusted for age, gender, height and weight; b -0.01, p = 0.045). 76% (95% CI 65.3-84.6) of ERA patients had EC in hand X-ray. Smoking habits and higher BMI (body mass index) were associated with an increased likelihood of having RA specific EC. In ERA, decreasing of HBMD was associated with the elevation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In ERA, HBMD changes were not associated with the appearance of erosions. Factors that associate in ERA with HBMD changes and appearance of erosions differ. HBMD assessment together with serum IL-6 level could be useful in everyday clinical practice for better surveillance of ERA patients who do not have EC in hand X-rays.

The association of serum RANKL levels with disease activity and hematological parameters in Syrian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Our study aims to detect whether the serum RANKL could be a novel potential biomarker for activity and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It included fifty-eight of RA patients and thirty of equal age and sex matched controls. Disease activity was determined by using DAS28-ESR. Serum Levels of RANKL were assayed by ELISA and compared with parameters such as ESR, CRP, Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). The serum RANKL levels were higher in RA patients compared to controls. There was an increase in its levels mean among post-menopausal patients compared to post-menopausal healthy group. RANKL levels were also higher in ACPA positive patients than ACPA negative. Our study found a correlation between RANKL levels and some parameters: DAS28, ACPA, CRP, and symptom duration. There was a moderate inverse correlation between RANKL levels and BMD. By ROC curve, our results displayed that the best cut-off value of RANKL was 178.99 pg/ml (sensitivity 79.31%; specificity 90%) to differentiate between RA patients and controls. In conclusion, elevated serum RANKL can be used as an indicator of disease activity and a diagnostic new biomarker in patients with early RA.

•

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is categorized by chronic synovitis leads to cartilage degradation, and bone erosions.

•

RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway stimulates osteoclasts and bone resorption.

•

ACPA are associated with bone erosions.

•

Serum RANKL correlates disease activity of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

•

Serum RANKL is an innovative indicator in of Rheumatoid Arthritis patients.

Mechanisms of Systemic Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune disease, is characterized by the presence of symmetric polyarthritis predominantly of the small joints that leads to severe cartilage and bone destruction. Based on animal and human data, the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, a frequent comorbidity in conjunction with RA, was delineated. Autoimmune inflammatory processes, which lead to a systemic upregulation of inflammatory and osteoclastogenic cytokines, the production of autoantibodies, and Th cell senescence with a presumed disability to control the systemic immune system's and osteoclastogenic status, may play important roles in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis in RA. Consequently, osteoclast activity increases, osteoblast function decreases and bone metabolic and mechanical properties deteriorate. Although a number of disease-modifying drugs to treat joint inflammation are available, data on the ability of these drugs to prevent fragility fractures are limited. Thus, specific treatment of osteoporosis should be considered in patients with RA and an associated increased risk of fragility fractures.

The Impact of Seropositivity on Systemic Bone Loss in Rheumatoid Arthritis-A 3-Year Interim Analysis of a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study

Objective

To explore the impact of seropositivity on systemic bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We conducted an interim analysis of the RA registry. Patients were examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and again 3 years later. Participants were grouped into seropositive (SPRA) and seronegative (SNRA) based on the presence or absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). After matching (1:2) for age and sex, SNRA and SPRA patients were divided into groups A and B. Each matched group (A or B) was further subdivided according to the number of antibodies present (0, group I; 1, group II; 2, group III). Multiple ordinary least squares regression was used with the dependent variables to develop a model to predict bone mineral density (BMD) change.

Results

A total of 477 participants who completed a 3-year observation period were included. After matching, 312 participants were enrolled (group A, 104; group B, 208). Three years later, group B had significant BMD reduction in the femoral neck (FN) (p < 0.001), total hip (TH) (p = 0.001), and first through fourth lumbar vertebrae (L1–4) (p = 0.006), while group A had bone loss only at FN (p = 0.002). Groups I, II, and III included 104, 52, and 156 participants, respectively. Compared to baseline, BMD decreased significantly at FN (p = 0.002) in group I, FN (p < 0.001) in group II, and FN (p < 0.001), TH (p = 0.002), and L1–4 (p = 0.016) in group III. In terms of regression-adjusted percent change in BMD, more significantly negative changes were found at all measured sites in group B (p < 0.001, all) and at TH and L1–4 within groups I-III (p for trend < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Regardless of antibodies, anti-osteoporotic therapy can preserve bone density in RA patients.

Conclusion

After 3 years, SPRA patients lost more bone density than SNRA patients. More attention should be paid to SPRA patients, especially those with double-positive antibodies, including a vigorous evaluation of BMD and fracture risk. Anti-osteoporotic therapy can prevent BMD loss irrespective of autoantibodies.

Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in the Management of Osteoporosis in Patients with Autoantibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis

Bone mineral density (BMD) reduction and fragility fractures still represent a major source of morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, despite adequate control of the disease. An increasing number of clinical and experimental evidence supports the role of autoantibodies, especially anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), in causing localized and generalised bone loss in ways that are both dependent on and independent of inflammation and disease activity. The human receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B and its ligand—the so-called RANK-RANKL pathway—is known to play a key role in promoting osteoclasts’ activation and bone depletion, and RANKL levels were shown to be higher in ACPA-positive early untreated RA patients. Thus, ACPA-positivity can be considered a specific risk factor for systemic and periarticular bone loss. Through the inhibition of the RANK-RANKL system, denosumab is the only antiresorptive drug currently available that exhibits both a systemic anti-osteoporotic activity and a disease-modifying effect when combined with conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Thus, the combination of DMARD and anti-RANKL therapy could be beneficial in the prevention of fragility fractures and structural damage in the subset of RA patients at risk of radiographic progression, as in the presence of ACPAs.

Inhibition of bone erosion, determined by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab vs csDMARD therapy alone: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

This exploratory study compared the inhibition of bone erosion progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab versus csDMARD therapy alone and investigated the effects of denosumab on bone micro-architecture and other bone-related parameters using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, patients with RA undergoing treatment with a csDMARD were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue csDMARD therapy alone or to continue csDMARDs with denosumab (60-mg subcutaneous injection once every 6 months) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the second and third metacarpal heads at 6 months after starting treatment. Exploratory endpoints were also evaluated, and adverse events (AEs) were monitored for safety.

RESULTS

In total, 46 patients were enrolled, and 43 were included in the full analysis set (csDMARDs plus denosumab, N = 21; csDMARD therapy alone, N = 22). Most patients were female (88.4%), and the mean age was 65.3 years. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the 2-3 metacarpal heads at 6 months was - 0.57 mm (- 1.52, 0.39 mm) in the csDMARDs plus denosumab group vs - 0.22 mm (- 0.97, 0.53 mm) in the csDMARD therapy alone group (between-group difference: - 0.35 mm [- 1.00, 0.31]; P = 0.2716). Similar results were shown for the adjusted mean between-group difference in the width and volume of bone erosion of the 2-3 metacarpal heads. Significant improvements in bone micro-architecture parameters were shown. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was similar between the csDMARDs plus denosumab and the csDMARD therapy alone groups (AEs: 52.2% vs 56.5%; serious AEs: 4.3% vs 8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs did not find statistically significant improvements in bone erosion after 6 months of treatment, numerical improvements in these parameters suggest that the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs may be effective in inhibiting the progression of bone erosion and improving bone micro-architecture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000030575. Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs071180018.