Zhou L, Zou X, Hu Q, Hua H, Qi Q. Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis.
J Infect Chemother 2024;
30:98-103. [PMID:
37714266 DOI:
10.1016/j.jiac.2023.09.014]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The early and efficient diagnosis of patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for PTB diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and compared it with other techniques such as acid-fast bacilli smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CapitalBio Mycobacterium reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (MTB RT-PCR).
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 195 patients with suspected PTB who were admitted to our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these assays were calculated and compared.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of nanopore sequencing were 90.70%, 84.85%, 92.13%, 82.35%, and 0.88; those of acid-fast bacilli smear were 12.40%, 98.48%, 94.12%, 36.52%, and 0.55; those of culture were 36.43%, 100%, 100%, 44.59%, and 0.68; those of Xpert MTB/RIF were 41.09%, 100%, 100%, 46.48%, and 0.71; and those of CapitalBio MTB RT-PCR were 34.88%, 98.48%, 97.83%, 43.62%, and 0.67, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The nanopore sequencing assay using BALF samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy for sputum-scarce PTB. Moreover, it can improve the clinical diagnosis of PTB.
Collapse