Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Risk of heart failure in inflammatory bowel disease: a Swedish population-based study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dysregulation of inflammatory and immune responses has been implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). But even if inflammation is a prerequisite for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), little is known about HF risk in IBD.

METHODS

In this Swedish nationwide cohort, patients with biopsy-confirmed IBD were identified between 1969 and 2017 [n = 81 749, Crohn's disease (CD, n = 24 303), ulcerative colitis (UC, n = 45 709), and IBD-unclassified (IBD-U, n = 11 737)]. Each patient was matched with up to five general population reference individuals (n = 382 190) and IBD-free full siblings (n = 95 239) and followed until 31 December 2019. Flexible parametric survival models estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and standardized cumulative incidence for HF, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

There were 5582 incident HF identified in IBD patients (incidence rate [IR]: 50.3/10 000 person-years) and 20 343 in reference individuals (IR: 37.9) during a median follow-up of 12.4 years. IBD patients had a higher risk of HF than reference individuals (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.23). This increased risk remained significant ≥20 years after IBD diagnosis, leading to one extra HF case per 130 IBD patients until then. The increased risk was also observed across IBD subtypes: CD (IR: 46.9 vs. 34.4; aHR 1.28 [1.20-1.36]), UC (IR: 50.1 vs. 39.7; aHR 1.14 [1.09-1.19]), and IBD-U (IR: 60.9 vs. 39.0; aHR 1.28 [1.16-1.42]). Sibling-controlled analyses showed slightly attenuated association (IBD: aHR 1.10 [1.03-1.19]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD had a moderately higher risk of developing HF for ≥20 years after IBD diagnosis than the general population.

Contraceptive Recommendations for Women with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Delphi Consensus

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are a group of disorders characterized by chronic inflammation caused by an altered immune regulation in targeted organs or systems. IMID itself could have an implied increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and this risk varies throughout the course of the disease as well as with some contraceptive methods and treatments. The aim of this study was to present some key considerations in relation to contraception in women with IMID.

METHODS

This was an exploratory study conducted in Spain following the online modified Delphi methodology with two rounds of participation. Four questionnaires were designed for each medical specialty: gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, and gynecology. Each questionnaire was divided in three domains: general recommendations about IMID, specific recommendations, and contraceptive methods for patients with IMID. A 5-point Likert scale measured agreement with each statement, with an 80% agreement threshold. Following the first round, the percentage of each response was calculated for every item. Subsequently, a second round was conducted to reach a consensus on the items for which discrepancies were observed.

RESULTS

A total of 52 and 50 experts participated in the first and second round, respectively. Participants agreed on the existence of a higher risk of VTE in inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis diseases. Regarding recommendations for contraceptive methods in patients with IMID, experts considered the hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) as a first-line contraceptive (80.0%) and low doses of progesterone-only pills if the latter is not recommended (88.0%). Most of the interviewees concurred on the importance of the patients' contraceptive needs during the disease course (98.1%).

CONCLUSION

Raising awareness and promoting a multidisciplinary relationship among the physicians involved in the therapeutic decisions by considering all the risk factors when prescribing a contraceptive method is important to prevent VTE in women with IMID.

Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option?

Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.

Inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: A Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The link between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is still unclear.

AIMS

We conducted a Mendelian randomization research and meta-analysis to explore the impact of IBD and its subtypes (Crohn's disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC]) on the risk of ICH.

METHODS

Two large genome-wide association analysis studies of International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC) and International Stroke Genetics Consortium as exposure (IBD, UC, and CD) and outcome (ICH) in the initial stage. IBD, CD, UC GWAS data from the FinnGen consortium were adopted for the replication phase, and ultimately, the results of the initial stage and replication phase data were combined in a meta-analysis to evaluate the causal association between IBD and its subtypes and the risk of ICH.

RESULTS

In the initial stage, we found that in the IVW (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.96, p = .01), MR-PRESSO (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97, p = .02) and MR.RAPS (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98, p = .02) method showed that UC is associated with the risk of ICH. The causal relationship between IBD, CD, and the risk of ICH cannot be found by the IVW method. IBD and its subtypes UC, CD, and risk of ICH cannot find the presence of heterogeneity and pleiotropy. In replication stage, IBD (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.94, p = .0135) related to ICH, while the IVW approach did not establish a causal link in UC and CD. The meta-analysis still indicated that UC (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, p < .05) would lessen the risk of ICH while the causality between IBD, CD, and ICH was unable to be established.

CONCLUSION

UC was causally related to ICH, but IBD and CD are not associated with ICH. The precise pathophysiological mechanism needs to be thoroughly investigated in more detail.

The oft-overlooked cardiovascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with several extraintestinal comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chronic inflammation is recognized as an important factor in atherogenesis, thrombosis, and myocarditis.

AREAS COVERED

IBD patients may be at increased risk for developing early atherosclerosis, cardiovascular events, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, myocarditis, and arrhythmias. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and thiopurines have been shown to have a protective effect against acute arterial events, but more research is needed. However, an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and major cardiovascular events has been described with the use of Janus kinase inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

CVD risk is slightly increased in patients with IBD, especially during flares. Thromboprophylaxis is strongly recommended in hospitalized patients with active disease as the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the risk of bleeding. The pathogenetic relationship between CVD and IBD and the impact of IBD drugs on CVD outcomes are not fully elucidated. CVD risk doesn't have the strength to drive a specific IBD treatment. However, proper CVD risk profiling should always be done and the best strategy to manage CVD risk in IBD patients is to combine appropriate thromboprophylaxis with early and durable remission of the underlying IBD.

Increasing rates of venous thromboembolism among hospitalised patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data on national trends remain limited.

AIMS

To assess national trends in VTE-associated hospitalisations among patients with IBD as well as risk factors for, and mortality associated with, these events METHODS: Using the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000-2018, temporal trends in VTE were assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression Program with estimates presented as the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2018, there were 4,859,728 hospitalisations among patients with IBD, with 128,236 (2.6%) having a VTE, and 6352 associated deaths. The rate of VTE among hospitalised patients with IBD increased from 192 to 295 cases per 10,000 hospitalisations (AAPC 2.4%, 95%CI 1.4%, 3.4%, p < 0.001), and remained significant when stratified by ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease as well as by deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On multivariable analysis, increasing age, male sex, UC (aOR: 1.30, 95%CI 1.26, 1.33), identifying as non-Hispanic Black, and chronic corticosteroid use (aOR: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16, 1.29) were associated with an increased risk of a VTE-associated hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Rates of VTE-associated hospitalisations are increasing among patients with IBD. Continued efforts need to be placed on education and risk reduction.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Two-year Retrospective Study of Patients Presenting With Inflammatory Bowel Disease to a Community Hospital

Objective

We set out to determine the rate of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients admitted with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and indirectly compare it to national trends. We also assessed the demographic and clinical correlates for non-prescription of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis among IBD patients with and without a flare.

Methods

We extracted data from 123 patients admitted to our facility with IBD from September 2018 to August 2020 retrospectively. Out of this cohort, 26 patients were excluded and 96 were included in our analysis. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlates of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis use in individuals with IBD and to analyze the predictors of VTE prophylaxis use in patients with IBD flares.

Results

Out of the 96 patients with IBD included in this study, 61 (63.5%) presented with an IBD flare, and among those with a flare, 26/61 (42.6%) received VTE prophylaxis. IBD patients aged ≥ 65 years and of Black race were less likely to be placed on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.20, 95% CI (0.06 - 0.70), p-value 0.012) and (AOR 0.16, 95% CI (0.05 - 0.50), p-value 0.002) respectively. Among those with a flare, the presence of bright red bleeding per rectum was associated with a low rate of pharmacologic VTE use (AOR 0.01, 95% CI (0.00 -1.78), p-value 0.001). Overall the rate of VTE prophylaxis use in the IBD patient cohort was 56.3% and this was irrespective of flare status.

Conclusion

Our study showed the low rate of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis use in IBD patients at this center and this finding was in line with national trends. Interestingly age and the race of patients played a major role in the decision to provide pharmacological VTE prophylaxis but the reason for this finding was not explored by our study. A larger multi-center study is needed to further evaluate these relationships.

Inflammatory bowel disease and thromboembolic events: a c'lot to learn

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a variety of extraintestinal manifestations including arterial and venous thromboembolism. Research evidences that IBD patients have about a 2- to 3-fold increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism when compared with the general population.

OBJECTIVES

We intended to evaluate the coagulation parameters and the prevalence of thromboembolic events (TE) in IBD patients. It was also our aim to investigate the correlation between coagulation parameters and disease phenotype and activity in this population.

METHODS

This single center prospective observational study was performed between November 2016 and April 2020. The cohort included patients with 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with IBD and followed at a gastroenterology consultation, during a follow-up period of 36 months. Patients were evaluated in terms of IBD type, extent and disease behavior, clinical scores of IBD activity, medication, smoking history, family and personal history of TE, coagulation parameters, fecal calprotectin levels, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hospitalization due to TE, IBD-related hospitalization or surgery, pregnancy, or diagnosis of malignancy.

RESULTS

The study included 149 IBD patients (67 males and 82 females). Coagulation parameters were similar in CD and UC patients and only plasminogen was increased in CD patients [97.4 (17.0) versus 91.6 (13.3), p = 0.035], when comparing with UC patients. The determined values were in the range of the reference values described in literature for the standard population. During the follow-up period, none of the patients experienced a TE that demanded hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

In our study, acquired and inherited risk factors for TE and changes in coagulation parameters did not show to influence prothrombotic predisposition in IBD patients. As such, the clinical relevance of measuring coagulation parameters in this population is questionable.

TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT05162339 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID).

Occurrence of Thromboembolism in Paediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Data From the CEDATA-GPGE Registry

OBJECTIVE

Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the risk of thromboembolism (TE) is increased, representing a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality. In contrast to other extraintestinal IBD manifestations, TE receives much less attention because of its low incidence, estimated at merely 0.4-0.9% in hospitalised children with IBD.

METHODS

Cases with TE, as documented in the German-Austrian Paediatric IBD registry gesellschaft für pädiatrische gastroenterologie und ernährung - large paediatric patient registry (CEDATA-GPGE), were analyzed retrospectively. For all patients with signs of TE, a questionnaire was filled in by the treating paediatric gastroenterologist.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 4,153 paediatric patients with IBD (0-18 years) were registered in the registry, and 12 of them identified with TE. Eight patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC), three with Crohn's disease (CD), and one with IBD-unclassified. The median age at IBD diagnosis was 10 years and at the manifestation of TE 13 years, respectively, with a median latency to TE of 2 years. Prevalence of TE was 0.3%, with a significantly higher risk for patients with UC than CD (OR 5.9, CI 1.56-22.33, p = 0.008). More girls than boys were affected (f:m = 7:5) without reaching significance. Approximately 90% of patients experienced TE during active disease, with relevant cerebral and limb involvement in 6/12 patients. Various risk factors, e.g., hospitalisation, coagulopathy, or anaemia were identified. TE management included intensive care and surgery. Among the 12 patients, 11 recovered fully, in which one patient has focal epilepsy as a sequela.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric patients with IBD have a substantially increased risk for TE. Risk factors, such as those identified should be considered when managing paediatric IBD and preventive measures for those hospitalised taken routinely. Initiating pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is challenging for the lack of published trials on efficacy and safety in paediatric IBD but should be considered carefully in each case.