Characteristics, Treatments, and Survival of Uveal Melanoma: A Comparison between Chinese and American Cohorts.
Cancers (Basel) 2022;
14:cancers14163960. [PMID:
36010953 PMCID:
PMC9406112 DOI:
10.3390/cancers14163960]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary
This retrospective comparative cohort study aimed to determine whether there were racial or national differences in UM, by comparing the demographic and clinical characteristics, such as tumor size, onset age, trend and proportion of treatment modalities, and overall survival. In the two cohorts, we found that Chinese patients have a younger onset age and a better survival rate. The survival advantage was likely secondary to younger onset age. In addition, a greater proportion of Chinese patients received brachytherapy as opposed to enucleation compared with American patients. This study was the first time comparing patients from different countries and races, which may help ophthalmologists better understand the clinical characteristics of the disease and suggests the importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant carcinoma. This study aimed to compare the clinical features, treatment modalities, and prognosis of UM patients in China with those in America over a 15-year period. In the study, 4088 American patients with primary UM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 1508 Chinese patients from Tongren-ophthalmology Research Association of Clinical Evaluation (TRACE) were included. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors and propensity score matching (PSM) and sensitivity analyses were applied to adjust for confounders and identify independent prognostic factors. Chinese patients were diagnosed at a younger age (mean ± SD, 47.3 ± 12.5 years vs. 59.7 ± 14.8 years) and tumors at diagnosis were larger (diameter: 12.0 ± 3.54 mm vs. 11.3 ± 8.27 mm; thickness: 7.13 ± 3.28 mm vs. 4.91 ± 3.01 mm). Chinese patients were more likely to undergo brachytherapy than American patients. Chinese patients had better overall survival than American patients while no significant differences exhibited after adjusting for age through PSM. In conclusion, compared with American patients, Chinese patients had younger onset age, larger tumors at diagnosis and better prognosis, mainly because of their younger age.
Collapse