Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective study

The global prevalence of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aims to review the literature and estimate the global pooled prevalence of interstitial lung disease among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD). The influence of risk factors like geography, socioeconomic status, smoking and DMARD use will be explored. A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. Studies published between January 1980 and February 2024 were sourced from 7 electronic databases and screened for eligibility. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to produce pooled prevalences and the potential between-study heterogeneity was identified using sensitivity, subgroup, meta-regression and correlation analyses. 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis containing 14,281 RA patients. The global pooled prevalence of RA-ILD was 21.38% (CI: 0.1542-0.2886), with a high heterogeneity (I2) of 98%. The prevalence of usual interstitial pneumonia and non-specific interstitial pneumonia among RA patients were 11.01% and 6.86% respectively. Africa had the highest RA-ILD prevalence with an imprecise estimate of 38.15% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.29-94.2) and Europe had the lowest prevalence of 10.15% (CI: 2.86-30.23). Other risk factors associated with a higher prevalence of RA-ILD included living in low-income countries, smoking and DMARD use. The biggest limitation of this study is the high heterogeneity of results and underrepresentation of Oceania and low-income countries. This study has clarified the global prevalence of RA-ILD. The risk factors identified in this study can aid clinicians in identifying high-risk populations and highlight the need for screening these populations. Smoking cessation should also be encouraged.

Clinical Course of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with high mortality. RA-ILD may initially be asymptomatic, and lung function may be markedly impaired by the time it is diagnosed. The course of RA-ILD is highly variable, with some patients experiencing no discernable progression or a slow decline, whereas others experience more rapid deterioration. Some patients develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis, which is associated with high mortality. Although risk factors for the progression of RA-ILD have been identified, including older age, worse lung function, and a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on high-resolution computed tomography, it is not possible to predict the course of RA-ILD in an individual patient. The association between RA disease activity and progression of RA-ILD remains unclear. Regular monitoring is important to enable the prompt identification of progression and early intervention to preserve lung function. The management of RA-ILD requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach, taking account of the severity and progression of articular and lung disease, risk factors for the progression of RA-ILD, and the patient's preferences, and may include immunosuppression, antifibrotic therapy, and supportive care.

Practical guidance for the early recognition and follow-up of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

The early detection and management of (progressive) interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases requires the attention and skills of a multidisciplinary team. However, there are currently no well-established standards to guide the daily practice of physicians treating this heterogenous group of diseases.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This paper aimed to identify gaps in scientific knowledge along the journey of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease and to provide tools for earlier identification of interstitial lung disease and progressive disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The opinions of an international expert panel, which consisted of pulmonologists and rheumatologists were collected and interpreted in the light of peer-reviewed data.

RESULTS

Interstitial lung disease is a common complication of connective tissue diseases, but prevalence estimates vary by subtype. Screening and monitoring by means of clinical examination, chest radiography, pulmonary function testing, and disease-specific biomarkers provide insight into the disease activity of patients presenting with connective tissue diseases in a routine setting. Multiple phenotypic and genotypic characteristics have been identified as predictors of the development and progression of interstitial lung disease. However, these risk factors differ between subtypes. To ensure earlier diagnosis of rapidly progressive phenotypes, a risk-based method is necessary for determining the need for HRCT and additional testing.

INTERPRETATION

To reduce the underdiagnosis of CTD-ILDs in clinical practice, a standardized and systematic multidisciplinary risk-based approach is suggested. Collaboration across disciplines is essential for the management of CTD-ILD.

Design of ANCHOR-RA: a multi-national cross-sectional study on screening for interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is associated with high mortality. Screening tools based on risk factors are needed to decide which patients with RA should be screened for ILD using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The ANCHOR-RA study is a multi-national cross-sectional study that will develop a multivariable model for prediction of RA-ILD, which can be used to inform screening for RA-ILD in clinical practice.

METHODS

Investigators will enrol consecutive patients with RA who have ≥ 2 of the following risk factors for RA-ILD: male; current or previous smoker; age ≥ 60 years at RA diagnosis; high-positive rheumatoid factor and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (titre > 3 x upper limit of normal); presence or history of certain extra-articular manifestations of RA (vasculitis, Felty's syndrome, secondary Sjögren's syndrome, cutaneous rheumatoid nodules, serositis, and/or scleritis/uveitis); high RA disease activity in the prior 12 months. Patients previously identified as having ILD, or who have had a CT scan in the prior 2 years, will not be eligible. Participants will undergo an HRCT scan at their local site, which will be assessed centrally by two expert radiologists. Data will be collected prospectively on demographic and RA-related characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities and pulmonary function. The primary outcomes will be the development of a probability score for RA-ILD, based on a multivariable model incorporating potential risk factors commonly assessed in clinical practice, and an estimate of the prevalence of RA-ILD in the study population. It is planned that 1200 participants will be enrolled at approximately 30 sites in the USA, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain.

DISCUSSION

Data from the ANCHOR-RA study will add to the body of evidence to support recommendations for screening for RA-ILD to improve detection of this important complication of RA and enable early intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT05855109 (submission date: 3 May 2023).

Advances in the identification and management of progressive pulmonary fibrosis: perspective from Chinese experts

Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (FILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can develop into progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) despite initial management. A substantial proportion of patients with non-IPF interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) progress to PPF, including connective tissue disease-associated ILD (such as rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD, systemic sclerosis-associated ILD, and idiopathic inflammatory myositis-associated ILD), fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and fibrosing occupational ILD. The concept of PPF emerged only recently and several studies have confirmed the impact of PPF on mortality. In addition to poor prognosis among patients with PPF, there remains a lack of consensus in the diagnosis and treatment of PPF across different types of ILDs. There is a need to raise awareness of PPF in FILDs and to explore measures to improve PPF diagnosis and treatment, which in turn could potentially reduce the progression from FILD to PPF. This review discusses the disease burden of PPF and recent advances in the management of PPF among patients with ILDs, including antifibrotic medications that have emerged as promising treatment options. Additionally, this review highlights the perspectives of expert Chinese physicians with regard to their experience in managing PPF in clinical practice.

Fibrosing Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multicentre Italian Study

BACKGROUND

The INBUILD study demonstrated the efficacy of nintedanib in the treatment of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease different to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related ILD. Nevertheless, the prevalence of RA-ILD patients that may potentially benefit from nintedanib remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

The aim of the present multicentre study was to investigate the prevalence and possible associated factors of fibrosing progressive patterns in a cross-sectional cohort of RA-ILD patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four RA-ILD patients with a diagnosis of RA-ILD, who were confirmed at high-resolution computed tomography and with a follow-up of at least 24 months, were enrolled. The patients were defined as having a progressive fibrosing ILD in case of a relative decline in forced vital capacity > 10% predicted and/or an increased extent of fibrotic changes on chest imaging in a 24-month period. Respiratory symptoms were excluded to reduce possible bias due to the retrospective interpretation of cough and dyspnea. According to radiologic features, ILD was classified as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in 50.7% of patients, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in 19.4%, and other patterns in 29.8%. Globally, a fibrosing progressive pattern was recorded in 36.6% of patients (48.5% of patients with a fibrosing pattern) with a significant association to the UIP pattern.

CONCLUSION

We observed that more than a third of RA-ILD patients showed a fibrosing progressive pattern and might benefit from antifibrotic treatment. This study shows some limitations, such as the retrospective design. The exclusion of respiratory symptoms' evaluation might underestimate the prevalence of progressive lung disease but increases the value of results.

Factors associated with interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is a potentially life-threatening complication with significant morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis aims to systematically determine the factors associated with the development of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All primary studies which reported the factors associated with of RA-ILD were eligible for the review except case reports. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG electronic databases were searched through to December 30, 2022, for studies investigating the factors associated with RA-ILD. The methodological quality assessment of the eligible studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). 2 reviewers extracted relevant data independently. Then, weighed mean differences (WMDs) or pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the relationships between the factors and RA-ILD. The statistical meta-analysis, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed using the Review Manager 5.3, and publication bias with Egger's test were performed using the Stata12.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 22 articles were screened for a meta-analysis which involved 1887 RA-ILD patients and 8066 RA without ILD patients. Some identified factors that were associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD included male sex (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.54-2.39; P < 0.00001), older age (WMD = 5.77 years, 95% CI: 3.50-8.04; P < 0.00001), longer duration of RA (WMD = 0.80 years, 95% CI 0.12-1.47; P = 0.02), older age at onset of RA (WMD = 6.41 years, 95% CI: 3.17-9.64; P = 0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.30-2.18; P < 0.0001). Five factors of laboratory items associated with the development of RA-ILD were evaluated in the meta-analysis. Compared with RA without ILD patients, positive rheumatoid factor (RF) (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.47-2.01; P < 0.00001) and positive anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.31-1.90; P < 0.00001) increased the risk of RA-ILD. Meanwhile, RF titer (WMD = 183.62 (IU/mL), 95% CI: 66.94-300.30; P = 0.002) and ACPA titer (WMD = 194.18 (IU/mL), 95% CI: 115.89-272.47; P < 0.00001) were significantly associated with increased risk of RA-ILD. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (WMD = 7.41 (mm/h), 95% CI: 2.21-12.61; P = 0.005) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD = 4.98 (mg/L), 95% CI: 0.76-9.20; P = 0.02) were also significantly associated with the development of the RA-ILD, whereas antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive status was not significantly associated with increased risk of RA-ILD (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.60; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that male gender, older age, longer duration of RA, older age at onset of RA, smoking, positive RF, positive ACPA, elevated RF titer, elevated ACPA titer, higher ESR and higher CRP were associated with RA-ILD.

Airflow obstruction as a marker of adverse prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

In our study, we explored the specific subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suffering from obstructive lung disease (OLD) and its impact on morbi-mortality.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 309 patients suffering from RA with either obstructive (O-RA) or non-obstructive patterns (non-O-RA). OLD was defined based on the Tiffeneau index at the first available pulmonary functional test (PFT). Survival was then calculated and represented by a Kaplan–Meier curve. The comparison between the populations considered was performed by the Log-Rank test.

Results

Out of the 309 RA patients, 102 (33%) had airway obstruction. The overall survival time was significantly lower in the O-RA group than in the non-O-RA group (n = 207) (p &lt; 0.001). The median survival time was 11.75 years in the O-RA group and higher than 16 years in the non-O-RA group. Multivariate analysis identified OLD as an independent risk factor for mortality (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.21–4.00, p &lt; 0.01).

Conclusion

Airway obstruction can be an independent risk factor of mortality in RA and should be considered as an early marker of poor prognosis. Further prospective longitudinal studies are required in order to determine the best clinical management for O-RA patients.