Clinical characteristics of combined rosacea and migraine

Erenumab for Treatment of Persistent Erythema and Flushing in Rosacea: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Treatment of erythema and flushing in rosacea is challenging. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been associated with the pathogenesis of rosacea, raising the possibility that inhibition of the CGRP pathway might improve certain features of the disease.

Objective

To examine the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of erenumab, an anti-CGRP-receptor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rosacea-associated erythema and flushing.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, open-label, single-group, nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted between June 9, 2020, and May 11, 2021. Eligible participants included adults with rosacea with at least 15 days of either moderate to severe erythema and/or moderate to extreme flushing. No concomitant rosacea treatment was allowed throughout the study period. Visits took place at the Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark. Participants received 140 mg of erenumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. A safety follow-up visit was performed at week 20. Data analysis occurred from January 2023 to January 2024.

Intervention

140 mg of erenumab every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was mean change in the number of days with moderate to extreme flushing during weeks 9 through 12, compared with the 4-week run-in period (baseline). The mean change in number of days with moderate to severe erythema was a secondary outcome. Adverse events were recorded for participants who received at least 1 dose of erenumab. Differences in means were calculated with a paired t test.

Results

A total of 30 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.8 [13.1] years; 23 female [77%]; 7 male [23%]) were included, of whom 27 completed the 12-week study. The mean (SD) number of days with moderate to extreme flushing was reduced by -6.9 days (95% CI, -10.4 to -3.4 days; P < .001) from 23.6 (5.8) days at baseline. The mean (SD) number of days with moderate to severe erythema was reduced by -8.1 days (95% CI, -12.5 to -3.7 days; P < .001) from 15.2 (9.1) days at baseline. Adverse events included transient mild to moderate constipation (10 participants [33%]), transient worsening of flushing (4 participants [13%]), bloating (3 participants [10%]), and upper respiratory tract infections (3 participants [10%]), consistent with previous data. One participant discontinued the study due to a serious adverse event (hospital admission due to gallstones deemed unrelated to the study), and 2 participants withdrew consent due to lack of time.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that erenumab might be effective in reducing rosacea-associated flushing and chronic erythema (participants generally tolerated the treatment well, which was consistent with previous data), and that CGRP-receptor inhibition holds potential in the treatment of erythema and flushing associated with rosacea. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04419259.

Evaluation of Dermatological and Neurological Aspects of the Relationship between Rosacea and Headaches

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between rosacea and headaches, focusing on different subtypes, as well as the associated clinical features and triggering factors. In this prospective study, 300 patients diagnosed with rosacea and 320 control subjects without rosacea or any connected mast cell activation illness were included. Patients with rosacea were assessed by a dermatologist according to the 2019 updated rosacea classification (ROSCO panel). Accordingly, patients were classified based on their predominant rosacea subtype as follows: erythematotelangiectatic (ETR), papulopustular (PPR), or phymatous (RhR). Patients experiencing headaches were assessed using the International Headache Classification. Headaches were categorized as migraine, tension-type headaches (TTHs), secondary types (STHs), and cluster-type headaches (CTHs). The ratio of headache was 30.3% in the rosacea group, which did not show a significant difference compared to the control group (30.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.138). In 81.3% of rosacea patients with headaches, headache onset occurred after the diagnosis of rosacea. The rate of patients with headaches was higher in the ETR group compared to the PPR and RhR groups (35.2% vs. 16.2% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.007, respectively). In terms of headache subtypes, the rates of patients with migraine and STHs were higher in the ETR group compared to the PPR and RhR groups, while the rate of patients with TTHs was higher in the RhR group. A positive correlation was found between rosacea severity and migraine severity (r = 0.284, p < 0.05). Among the triggering factors for rosacea, only sunlight was found to be associated with headaches. Lower age, female gender, and moderate to severe rosacea severity were identified as independent factors increasing the likelihood of headaches. A significant portion of rosacea patients experience headaches. Particularly, different subtypes of rosacea may be associated with various types of headaches. This study, highlighting the connection between migraine and ETR, is a pioneering work that demonstrates common pathogenic mechanisms and potential triggers.

An exploratory comparative case series of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine with rosacea

Rosacea is associated with &gt; 50% of cases of migraine. Recent data have shown that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is elevated in rosacea skin. CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) prevent migraine with known safety profiles, but their effect on rosacea is not known. This exploratory retrospective study examined rosacea in patients with migraines, before and after CGRP mAbs. Of 13 eligible patients on stable or unchanged concurrent rosacea medications, the majority experienced improvement after receiving CGRP mAbs. Mean (SD) rosacea severity scores for the periods before and while on CGRP mAbs were, respectively, 1.19 (0.65) and 0.58 (0.70) (P = 0.01). Prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to further assess the use of CGRP mAbs in rosacea.

Validity and reliability of the Rosacea Area and Severity Index: A novel scoring system for clinical assessment of rosacea severity

BACKGROUND

Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory facial skin disorder. Standardized evaluation of the severity and extent of rosacea is important for baseline assessment and treatment effect. The currently used Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is unspecific and fails to consider subtypes/phenotypes of rosacea and area involvement. The Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI) was developed to give a more nuanced evaluation of rosacea features in four facial skin areas adjusted to the relative importance of each area of the face to obtain an overall severity score.

OBJECTIVES

To validate RASI against the IGA and to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for RASI.

METHODS

Sixteen dermatologists evaluated photographs of 60 adult patients with rosacea (3 photographs per patient, one from the front and one from each side). IGA and RASI scores were performed for interobserver reliability assessment. To determine intraobserver reliability, 14 dermatologists evaluated 10 other patients twice with at least 1 week interval.

RESULTS

The IGA and RASI correlated well (Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-0.78). Interobserver reliability was moderate for RASI and poor to moderate for IGA. Reliability was strongest for rhinophyma, followed by papules/pustules and erythema, and rather weak for telangiectasia. For area scores, interobserver reliability was strongest for cheeks, followed by nose, chin and forehead. We found a moderate-to-strong intraobserver agreement both for IGA and RASI.

CONCLUSIONS

We have designed a new practical tool to examine clinical severity of rosacea. RASI proved simple and reliable in scoring clinical severity of rosacea with an agreement comparable to the currently used IGA although RASI will provide a more nuanced view of the current rosacea extent and severity. We suggest that RASI is used in the daily clinical setting as well as in clinical studies assessing the efficacy of rosacea therapies.