EQ-5D full health state after therapy heralds reduced hazard to accrue subsequent organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus

Anifrolumab treatment improves patient-reported quality of life and decreases disease activity and corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study in Denmark

Anifrolumab is a new therapeutic approach for individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) directed at blocking the type 1 interferon pathway. Despite the expanding body of literature on Anifrolumab, an essential aspect remains absent: the subjective patient experience of treatment effects and implications on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study aimed to fill this void by elucidating the nuanced perspectives of SLE patients receiving Anifrolumab treatment by conducting qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs). SLE patients at Aarhus University Hospital who had received at least three infusions of Anifrolumab were approached for inclusion in the study, which comprised two main elements: (1) qualitative IDIs and (2) collection of patient data from electronic medical records (EMRs). The IDIs were semi-structured and based on a discussion guide that included open-ended and close-ended questions. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using qualitative software to understand concepts important to patients and to understand patients' own experiences before and after Anifrolumab therapy. A clinical chart review was conducted using EMR data at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after Anifrolumab initiation. IDIs were completed with 14 patients, and EMR data was collected from 16 patients (treatment days range: 62-474). Of the 23 symptoms spontaneously reported by patients prior to Anifrolumab treatment, fatigue, joint pain, sun sensitivity, joint stiffness, skin rashes, and hair loss were the most common. Most symptoms improved, and none worsened during treatment. Patients reported significant impacts of disease on daily life before treatment: day-to-day activities, social life, emotional aspects, physical activity, concentration/memory, work/employment, and family/romantic relationships. Patients reported improvements in all aspects after treatment but were still impacted. From the EMR data, we observed a fall in disease activity after treatment initiation with a concomitant reduction in the use of corticosteroids. This study provides valuable insights into the subjective experiences of SLE patients treated with Anifrolumab, and the findings collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the treatment's efficacy from the patients' perspective and its tangible effects on both subjective and objective parameters in SLE patients.

Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need

The paradigm of drug approval in SLE currently relies on successful large phase III randomised controlled trials and a set of primary, secondary and additional end points. Taken together, these outcomes offer a nuanced understanding of the efficacy and safety of the investigational agent. In this review, we thoroughly examine the main outcomes used in SLE trials and highlight unmet requirements as well as potential venues for future trial design in SLE. Disease activity indices can be broadly categorised into global-specific and organ-specific indices, in particular for skin, joints and kidneys, but there is no universal consensus about their use in clinical trials. Because each of these instruments has its own intrinsic strengths and weaknesses, the assessment of treatment response has progressed from relying solely on one individual disease activity index to using composite responder definitions. Those are typically measured from the trial baseline to the end point assessment date and may be combined with the need to taper and maintain glucocorticoids (GCs) within prespecified ranges. Remission and low disease activity are two critical states in the perspective of 'Treat-to-Target' trials, but are not fully recognised by regulators. While significant progress has been made in clinical trial outcomes for SLE, there is a clear need for continued innovation. Addressing these challenges will require collaboration between researchers, clinicians, patients as well as with regulatory agencies to refine existing outcome measures, incorporate meaningful and ethnically diverse patient perspectives, foster relevant digital opportunities and explore new therapeutic avenues, including early use of investigational agents. By doing so, we can advance our ability to manage SLE effectively and safely and improve the lives of those living with this complex and impactful autoimmune disease.

The communication GAP between patients and clinicians and the importance of patient reported outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) imposes a great burden on the lives of patients. Patients' and physicians' concerns about the disease diverge considerably. Physicians focus on controlling disease activity to prevent damage accrual, while patients focus on symptoms that impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). We explored the physicians' and patients' perspective and the potential role of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs). Physicians are aware of the theoretical usefulness of PROs to collect information deriving from the patients' perspective. However, they often do not know how to interpret and use these questionnaires in a real shared therapeutic strategy. For the patients, it's important to be seen as a whole person with a true consideration of how they feel and function. Strategies to help bridge the communication gap could include: better use of time during visits, preparing for the consultation, a more understandable lay language used by the doctor, a dedicated nurse.

Sensitivity analysis of EQ-5D-3L index scores in terms of discriminative and known-groups validity in SLE: introducing Adequate Health State

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of different EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) index scores to discriminate between verum drug and placebo (discriminant validity) as well as between responders and non-responders (known-groups validity) in the SLE patient population of two phase III clinical trials of belimumab.

METHODS

Data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials (N = 1684), which both showed superiority of belimumab to placebo, were utilized. Responders were defined as SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) achievers at week 52. The Pearson's χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons, and logistic regression analysis was used for adjustments for confounders and assessment of independence.

RESULTS

While full health state (FHS; EQ-5D index score 1) showed the best ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.11, 1.96; P = 0.008] and between SRI-4 responders and non-responders (adjusted OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.29, 10.98; P = 0.020), the discriminative ability of EQ-5D index scores 0.800 or more reached statistical significance for both discriminant validity (adjusted OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.02, 1.63; P = 0.036) and known-groups validity (adjusted OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.16, 9.69; P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Overall, higher EQ-5D index scores were associated with increasing ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo, and between responders and non-responders. EQ-5D index scores less stringent than FHS may be clinically relevant health-related quality of life goals of treatment in patients with SLE, introducing the concept of EQ-5D adequate health state when FHS is not achievable.

Obesity is associated with pain and impaired mobility despite therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

To investigate whether abnormal BMI is associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impairments, defined as patient-reported problems within the different dimensions of the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L), before and after treatment for active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Patients and methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from two phase III clinical trials of belimumab in SLE, i.e., BLISS-52 (n = 865) and BLISS-76 (n = 819). Underweight was defined as BMI <18.5 kg/m2, normal weight as BMI ≥18.5 but <25 kg/m2, pre-obesity as BMI ≥25 but <30 kg/m2, and obesity as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. We investigated associations between BMI groups and problems (level 2 or 3) within each one of the five EQ-5D dimensions before treatment initiation and at week 52, using logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, ethnicity, disease activity, and glucocorticoid dose, and for the post-treatment analysis also for belimumab treatment and baseline EQ-5D-3L responses.

Results

Of 1,684 patients included, 73 (4%) were classified as underweight, 850 (50%) as normal weight, 438 (26%) as pre-obese, and 323 (19%) as obese. At baseline, obesity was associated with mild to severe problems in all EQ-5D dimensions (p < 0.05 for all), yielding the strongest association with problems in mobility (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 2.1; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.6-2.8; p < 0.001). Pre-obesity was also associated with problems in mobility (aOR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8; p = 0.005). Post-intervention, obesity was associated with problems in mobility and pain/discomfort, and pre-obesity with problems in mobility and self-care (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Our study adds to the evidence that high BMI negatively affects SLE patients' HRQoL, with obesity being associated with pain and impaired mobility despite therapy.