Evaluation of Disk Halo Size and Identification of Correlated Factors in Myopic Adults

Characteristics and influencing factors of corneal higher-order aberrations in patients with cataract

PURPOSE

To observe the distribution characteristics of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in cataract patients, and analyze the relationship of HOAs with patients' age and ocular biometric parameters.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviews the patients with cataract in Wuhan Aier Eye Department from January to August 2022. Root mean square (RMS) of the total HOA (tHOA), spherical aberration (SA), coma and trefoil aberration of the anterior cornea at central 4 and 6 mm optic zone were measured by the Wavefront Aberrometer (OPD-Scan III; Nidek Inc, Tokyo, Japan). The biometric parameters including axial length (AL), keratometry (K), central corneal thickness (CCT) and lens thickness (LT) were measured by swept-source coherence laser interferometry (OA-2000; TOMEY Corp, Aichi, Japan). Subgroup analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine whether HOAs were associated with age and ocular biometric parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 976 patients (976 eyes) were included, averagely aged 65 years. At central 4 and 6 mm optic zone, the mean RMS of tHOA were respectively 0.20 and 0.65 μm, the SA were 0.06 and 0.30 μm, the coma aberration were 0.11 and 0.35 μm, and the trefoil aberration were 0.12 and 0.30 μm. The tHOA decreased with age until 60 years and then started to increase afterwards. The tHOA, coma and trefoil aberration increased with corneal astigmatism. The tHOA, SA, and coma aberration differ among different AL groups, and emmetropes had the smallest tHOA, SA, and coma aberration.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing age, the value of tHOA decrease first and started increasing at 60 years. The trends of corneal HOAs are consistent with corneal low-order aberrations. The values of tHOA, SA and coma aberration were the smallest in emmetropic eyes.

Corneal higher order aberrations by Sirius topography and their relation to different refractive errors

PURPOSE

To compare the root mean square (RMS) of anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in ametropic and emmetropic eyes.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Tishreen University Hospital, Latakia, Syria. Study eyes were divided into four groups based on refractive error: mild-to-moderate myopia, hypermetropia, myopic astigmatism, and emmetropic eyes as controls. The following anterior corneal HOAs were evaluated using the Scheimpflug-Placido Sirius (CSO, Italy) tomographer over 6 mm pupil: Root mean square (RMS) total corneal HOAs, RMS trefoil, RMS coma and RMS spherical aberrations.

RESULTS

RMS values of total HOAs, trefoil and coma showed statistically significant differences in all four groups (P < 0.05, all). HOAs were noted to be lowest in the control group (0.18 ± 0.09, 011 ± 0.08 and 0.09 ± 0.08 μm, respectively) and highest in the myopic astigmatism group (0.31 ± 0.16, 0.15 ± 0.12, 0.17 ± 0.14 μm, respectively). RMS spherical aberration was lowest in the astigmatism group (0.00 ± 0.16 μm) with a statistically significant difference from that in the control group (0.05 ± 0.07 μm, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The mean RMS values of total HOAs, trefoil and coma were highest in the astigmatism group and lowest in the control group. However, spherical aberration was minimal in the astigmatism group. A better understanding and targeted treatment of higher-order aberrations in ametropic human eyes, and in particular eyes with astigmatism, may enhance visual quality and performance in the treatment of refractive errors. Recognising atypical HOAs may also assist in the early detection of pathological conditions such as keratoconus.

Evaluating early-stage disk halo changes after small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To investigate early changes in the disk halo under different light conditions after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This prospective study included 70 eyes of 70 myopic patients aged 18-33 years, with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -5.87 ± 1.86 D, who underwent SMILE. The subjective refraction, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), pupillometry, and halo were measured preoperatively and postoperatively to analyse disk halo variations and correlated factors.

RESULTS

At 5 cd/m2 and 1 cd/m2 luminance, the halo radius in the high myopia (HM) group reached a postoperative peak after 1 week (p = 0.000 and 0.019, respectively), and recovered to baseline after 3 months. In the low-to-moderate (LM) myopia group, the halo radius did not differ 1 week postoperatively compared to the preoperative level (p = 0.015), but significantly improved after 3 months (p = 0.000). The halo radius correlated with SE, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), ocular HOAs, coma, and the pupillary light reflex in the LM group at all time points, but there were no correlations in the HM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Halo symptoms occurred early after SMILE, but recovered within 3 months. The recovery process was slower in the HM group than in the LM group, and the halo radius correlated with SE, UDVA, ocular HOAs, coma, and the pupillary light reflex.

Analysis of the Changes and Possible Reasons in Aberrations before and after Surgery in Patients with Concomitant Exotropia

Objective. The objective is to observe the changes in aberrations before and after surgery in patients with common horizontal strabismus and to analyze the possible reasons for the changes. Methods. Forty eyes of 40 cases with concomitant exotropia who underwent strabismus correction at the Ophthalmology Department of Nantong University Hospital from October 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study, all of whom underwent unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with a medial rectus resection in the same eye. Aberration parameters were measured 1 day before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Differences in the indicators at each time period were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) of repeated measures data for a single factor, and data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 statistical application software. Results. 5 mm pupil diameter: the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( $P<0.01$ ). Postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison at each period after surgery showed statistically significant differences between 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.002$ ) and preoperative comparison. The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ); postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there were statistically significant differences between 1 week ( $P=0.033$ ) and 6 months ( $P=0.002$ ) after operation. The difference of RMS of defocus before and after operation was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ); postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( $P=0.007$ ) and preoperative comparison. There was statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative RMS of HOAs ( $P=0.013$ ). Postoperative test (Bonferroni method) and preoperative comparison showed that there was statistically significant difference 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.03$ ). The RMS of secondary astigmatism showed a statistically significant difference before and after operation ( $P=0.001$ ), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed a statistically significant difference 6 months after operation ( $P=0.002$ ). In 5 mm pupil diameter, the preoperative and postoperative RMS of total aberration showed statistically significant difference ( $P<0.01$ ), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( $P=0.034$ ), 3 months after surgery ( $P=0.033$ ), and 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.003$ ). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of RMS in LOAs was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ), postoperative test (Bonferroni method) was used to compare each period after surgery with that before surgery, and there were statistically significant differences between 1 week after surgery ( $P=0.04$ ), 3 months after surgery ( $P=0.034$ ), and 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.004$ ). The difference of RMS of defocus before and after surgery was statistically significant ( $P=0.002$ ), and the comparison between postoperation test (Bonferroni method) and preoperation showed that the difference was statistically significant 6 months after surgery ( $P=0.027$ ). The RMS of astigmatism showed statistically significant difference before and after operation ( $P=0.002$ ), and the postoperation test (Bonferroni method) showed statistically significant difference between 6 months after operation ( $P=0.009$ ) and before operation. Conclusion. We found that horizontal rectus surgery had a transient effect on LOAs and almost no effect on HOAs. Long-term follow-up is recommended after strabismus surgery to observe eye position and binocular visual function. Because of the high prevalence of strabismus in adolescents, long-term observation of the eye axis and aberration is recommended.

A Comprehensive Investigation of Contrast Sensitivity and Disk Halo in High Myopia Treated With SMILE and EVO Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcomes in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and EVO implantable Collamer lens (ICL)–treated high myopia.

Methods

Thirty-three SMILE-treated and 32 EVO ICL-treated patients were included and followed up for 6 months. Subjective refraction, contrast sensitivity, and disk halo size were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained at the final visit.

Results

Significant differences in efficacy and safety indices were observed between the SMILE and EVO ICL groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). In the SMILE group, the mesopic contrast sensitivity at 2.2 cycles per degree (cpd) and photopic contrast sensitivity at 0.5, 3.4, and 7.1 cpd were significantly improved. In the EVO ICL group, the mesopic contrast sensitivity at 7.1 cpd and photopic contrast sensitivity at 0.5, 7.1, and 14.6 cpd were significantly improved. The halo radii after SMILE were significantly increased at 1 week, showed a decreasing trend at 1 month, returned to baseline at 3 months, and progressed stably at 6 months. However, it was unchanged in the EVO ICL group. Regarding subjective experience, haloes were the most common disturbance with mild and little bothersomeness after EVO ICL in contrast to starbursts after SMILE.

Conclusions

EVO ICL implantation yielded better visual outcomes, improved contrast sensitivity particularly at high spatial frequencies, had a stabler disk halo size, and increased incidence of haloes, with less influence than that of SMILE.

Translational Relevance

The disk halo and PRO findings will be of benefit for consultations and evaluations in visual performance and disturbances.