Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography and Swept-Source Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Posterior Uveitis

Clinical Utilisation of Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography and Angiography: A Narrative Review

Many important abnormalities of the vitreous, retina and choroid are predominantly located in the peripheral retina. In some retinal diseases with both central and peripheral manifestations, pathological structural or vascular changes can be apparent in the periphery before they are detectable in the central retina. Conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) imaging only cover the most posterior 30° of the retina. Wide-field OCT (WF-OCT), though offering detailed cross-sectional imaging of the peripheral retina, is not yet systematically used in clinical practice. This narrative review provides a presentation of the utilisation of WF-OCT and WF-OCT-A in the diagnosis and monitoring of a variety of ophthalmological diseases and discusses the advantages and limitations of the technology. With the rapidly developing technology, multiple WF-OCT and WF-OCT-A devices are now commercially available and enable the clinician to obtain scans within a field of view up to 200°. As detailed in this review, several studies have shown promising results in the application of WF-OCT and WF-OCT-A in diseases of the retina, choroid and vitreous, such as retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, ocular oncology, paediatric ophthalmology, uveitis and lesions of the vitreo-retinal interface. In conclusion, WF-OCT and WF-OCT-A can reliably produce high-quality, non-invasive images of the vitreous, retinal, and choroidal structures and vascularity covering the posterior pole as well as the mid and far periphery. These methods can be a valuable part of a multimodal imaging approach in the management of a variety of ocular conditions. Future studies are warranted to investigate the patient outcome benefits of implementation of WF-OCT and WF-OCT-A imaging in a real-life clinical setting.

Peripheral retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy on ultra-widefield imaging

Peripheral retinal imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Traditional fundus imaging techniques have limited coverage of the retina, resulting in missed peripheral lesions. The advent of ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging has revolutionized the assessment of the peripheral retina. UWF imaging modalities provide comprehensive visualization of the retina, enabling the detection of peripheral lesions without the need for mydriasis. Integration of UWF imaging with other modalities, including fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography, pseudocolor imaging, and fundus autofluorescence, further enhances our understanding of peripheral retinal lesions. UWF imaging has demonstrated improved detection of DR lesions and presumably more accurate management of DR compared to traditional fundus photography and dilated fundus examination. UWF-FA and UWF-optical coherence tomography angiography have emerged as valuable tools for assessing retinal and choroidal vascular abnormalities, nonperfusion areas, neovascularization, and microvascular abnormalities. The presence and increasing extent of predominantly peripheral lesions detected using UWF FA are associated with a higher risk of DR progression and proliferative DR. UWF imaging provides a comprehensive evaluation of DR severity, aiding in more accurate risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Overall, UWF imaging modalities have significantly advanced our understanding of peripheral retinal lesions in DR, facilitating early detection and targeted management for better visual outcomes.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) in Uveitis: A Literature Review and a Reassessment of Its Real Role

BACKGROUND

The global and precise follow-up of uveitis has become possible with the availability of dual fluorescein (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) since the mid-1990s. Progressively, additional non-invasive imaging methods have emerged, bringing value-added precision to the imaging appraisal of uveitis, including, among others, optical coherence tomography (OCT), enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) and blue light fundus autofluorescence (BAF). More recently, another complementary imaging method, OCT-angiography (OCT-A), further allowed retinal and choroidal circulation to be imaged without the need for dye injection.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was aimed at examining the evidence in published reports indicating whether OCT-A could possibly replace dye angiographic methods, as well as the real practical impact of OCT-A.

METHODS

A literature search in the PubMed database was performed using the terms OCT-angiography and uveitis, OCTA and uveitis and OCT-A and uveitis. Case reports were excluded. Articles were classified into technical reports, research reports and reviews. Articles in the two latter categories were analyzed in a more detailed, individual fashion. Special attention was paid to whether there were arguments in favor of an exclusive rather than complementary use of OCT-A. Furthermore, a synthesis of the main practical applications of OCT-A in the management of uveitis was attempted.

RESULTS

Between 2016 (the year of the first articles) and 2022, 144 articles containing the search terms were identified. After excluding case report articles, 114 articles were retained: 4 in 2016, 17 in 2017, 14 in 2018, 21 in 2019, 14 in 2020, 18 in 2021 and 26 in 2022. Seven articles contained technical information or consensus-based terminology. Ninety-two articles could be considered as clinical research articles. Of those, only two hinted in their conclusions that OCT-A could hypothetically replace dye methods. The terms mostly used to qualify the contribution of the articles in this group were "complementary to dye methods", "adjunct", "supplementing" and other similar terms. Fifteen articles were reviews, none of which hinted that OCT-A could replace dye methods. The situations where OCT-A represented a significant practical contribution to the practical appraisal of uveitis were identified.

CONCLUSION

To date, no evidence was found in the literature that OCT-A can replace the classic dye methods; however, it can complement them. Promoting the possibility that non-invasive OCT-A can substitute the invasive dye methods is deleterious, giving the elusive impression that dye methods are no longer inevitable for evaluating uveitis patients. Nevertheless, OCT-A is a precious tool in uveitis research.

Benefits and Limitations of OCT-A in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Posterior Intraocular Inflammation in Current Clinical Practice: A Valuable Tool or a Deceiver?

Purpose: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) has been applied to uveitis and intraocular inflammation since its availability after 2014. The imaging of retinal and choroidal vascularization without the use of dyes was a major development and represented a potentially valuable tool in ocular research. In addition to such use, OCT-A is often put forward as being able to potentially replace invasive methods needing dye injection, such as fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). The aim of this review was to establish whether OCT-A was sufficiently useful in everyday routine clinical practice to monitor disease evolution and to perform treatment adjustments to the extent that it could reliably replace the standard dye methods. Methods: Selective literature review and analysis of own data and experience. Results: OCT-A is a technologically high-grade imaging modality allowing to analyze retinal circulation in inflammatory diseases of the posterior pole with a high sensitivity useful for research purposes. However, there is no evidence that it reaches equal effectiveness in the routine management of posterior uveitis involving the retina. OCT-A is unable to show leakage. In choriocapillaritis involving pre-capillary vessels, it shows capillary drop-out but does not seem to have an advantage over ICGA except that it can be repeated easily, not being invasive, and so allows a closer follow-up. It is, however, less useful in end-choriocapillary non-perfusion, such as in MEWDS. For choroidal stromal inflammation, OCT-A is ill-suited as it only shows inconsistent secondary circulatory changes produced by choroidal foci. OCT-A seems to be useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of inflammatory chorioneovascularisation (iCNV), although dye exams are more precise in showing the activity of the iCNV. Conclusion: In summary, OCT-A is a very sensitive modality for the retinal circulation in uveitis for research purposes; it is sometimes useful for close follow of choriocapillary drop-out but not in end-capillary non-perfusion. Its use for monitoring purposes in stromal choroiditis, however, is questionable. Its claim to possibly replace classical angiographic work-up for the practical management of posterior uveitis is largely overrated.