1
|
Draeger L, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Bleidorn J, Kannengiesser L, Schmidt K, Apfelbacher C, Matthaeus-Kraemer C. Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Sepsis Care Pathways-Qualitative Pilot Expert Interviews. J Clin Med 2025; 14:619. [PMID: 39860625 PMCID: PMC11766067 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2024] [Revised: 01/11/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Despite recent decades' rapid advances in the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock, global sepsis mortality and post-acute sepsis morbidity rates remain high. Our aim was, therefore, to provide a first overview of sepsis care pathways as well as barriers and supportive conditions for optimal pre-clinical, clinical, and post-acute sepsis care in Germany. Methods: Between May and September 2023, we conducted semi-structured, video-based, one-to-one pilot expert interviews with healthcare professionals representing pre-hospital, clinical, and post-acute care settings. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed according to the principles of Mayring's content analysis. Results: The eight interviewed professionals identified perceived critical success factors along the entire care pathway with regard to early detection (e.g., disease awareness), early acute treatment (e.g., unknown origin of infection), rehabilitation/aftercare (e.g., availability of primary care actors), and patient transitions within and between sectors (e.g., advance notice of patient arrival). These critical factors comprised: (1) the characteristics of the staff providing care (e.g., available experience), (2) the aids/utilities used (e.g., SOPs), (3) the presentation of the disease (e.g., clear symptoms), (4) the workplace (e.g., high workload), and (5) the cooperation between the staff caring for the patient (e.g., announced and standardized handovers). Conclusions: Apart from the specific recommendations that can be derived from the individual factors presented, it can be summarized that all levels of care seem only to be purposeful if providers collaborate and communicate efficiently (i.e., correct triage, multiple-eye principle, transfer management, provision of content-rich medical/discharge letters).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Draeger
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Jutta Bleidorn
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Lena Kannengiesser
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Faculty of Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Schmidt
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Institute of General Practice, Brandenburg Medical School, 14770 Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Faculty of Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Matthaeus-Kraemer
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schade Skov C, Østervang C, Brabrand M, Lassen AT, Nielsen DS. How do sepsis survivors experience life after sepsis? A Danish qualitative study exploring factors of importance. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081558. [PMID: 38355189 PMCID: PMC10868268 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sepsis is a condition associated with high mortality and morbidity, and survivors often experience physical and psychological decline. Previous research has primarily focused on sepsis survivors discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to explore and understand the consequences of sepsis experienced by sepsis survivors in general. DESIGN A qualitative study inspired by a phenomenological hermeneutical approach was conducted. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation. SETTING Patients with sepsis were identified on admission to the emergency department and invited to an interview 3 months after discharge. PARTICIPANTS Sixteen sepsis survivors were purposively sampled and interviewed. Among these survivors, one patient was admitted to the ICU. RESULTS Three main themes were derived from the analysis: new roles in life, cognitive impairment and anxiety. Although many survivors described a physical decline, they experienced psychological and cognitive impairments after sepsis as the most influential factors in daily life. The survivors frequently experienced fatigue, withdrawals from social activities and anxiety. CONCLUSION Sepsis survivors' experiences appeared to overlap regardless of ICU admission or treatment at the general ward. Identifying patients with sepsis-related decline is important to understand and support overall patient processes and necessary in meeting specific needs of these patients after hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Schade Skov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christina Østervang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Brabrand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Annmarie Touborg Lassen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorthe Susanne Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fleischmann-Struzek C, Rose N, Ditscheid B, Draeger L, Dröge P, Freytag A, Goldhahn L, Kannengießer L, Kimmig A, Matthäus-Krämer C, Ruhnke T, Reinhart K, Schlattmann P, Schmidt K, Storch J, Ulbrich R, Ullmann S, Wedekind L, Swart E. Understanding health care pathways of patients with sepsis: protocol of a mixed-methods analysis of health care utilization, experiences, and needs of patients with and after sepsis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:40. [PMID: 38191398 PMCID: PMC10773042 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10509-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis is associated with about 20% of deaths worldwide. It often presents with non-specific initial symptoms, making its emergency treatment an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral challenge. Three in four sepsis survivors suffers from new cognitive, psychological, or physical sequelae for which specific treatment concepts are scarce. The AVENIR project aims to improve the understanding of patient pathways, and subjective care experiences and needs along the entire healthcare pathway before, with and after sepsis. Based on this, concrete recommendations for the organization of care and patient information materials will be developed with close patient participation. METHODS Mixed-methods study including (1) analysis of anonymized nationwide health claims data from Germany, (2) linkage of health claims data with patient care reports (PCR) of emergency medical services from study regions in two federal states within Germany, and (3) qualitative exploration of the patient, relative, and care provider perspective on sepsis care. In (1), we analyze inpatient and outpatient health care utilization until 30 days pre-sepsis; clinical sepsis care including intra- and inter-hospital transfers; and rehabilitation, inpatient and outpatient aftercare of sepsis survivors as well as costs for health care utilization until 24 months post-sepsis. We attempt to identify survivor classes with similar health care utilization by Latent Class Analyses. In (2), PCR are linked with health claims data to establish a comprehensive database outlining care pathways for sepsis patients from pre-hospital to follow-up. We investigate e.g., whether correct initial assessment is associated with acute (e.g., same-day lethality) and long-term (e.g., new need for care, long-term mortality) outcomes of patients. We compare the performance of sepsis-specific screening tools such as qSOFA, NEWS-2 or PRESEP in the pre-clinical setting. In (3), semi-structured interviews as well as synchronous and asynchronous online focus groups are conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analyses techniques. DISCUSSION The results of the AVENIR study will contribute to a deeper understanding of sepsis care pathways in Germany. They may serve as a base for improvements and innovations in sepsis care, that in the long-term can contribute to reduce the personal, medical, and societal burden of sepsis and its sepsis sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at German Clinical Trial Register (ID: DRKS00031302, date of registration: 5th May 2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| | - Norman Rose
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Bianka Ditscheid
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Lea Draeger
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Antje Freytag
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Ludwig Goldhahn
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Lena Kannengießer
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Aurelia Kimmig
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Claudia Matthäus-Krämer
- Institute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Stoystraße 3, 07743, Jena, Germany
- Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Konrad Reinhart
- Sepsis Foundation, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Schlattmann
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Konrad Schmidt
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josephine Storch
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Ruben Ulbrich
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Lisa Wedekind
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Enno Swart
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eaton TL, Taylor SP. Health system approaches to providing posthospital care for survivors of sepsis and critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29:513-518. [PMID: 37641522 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the current review, we highlight developing strategies taken by healthcare systems to improve posthospital outcomes for sepsis and critical illness. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies conducted in the adult population over the last 18 months have advanced current knowledge on postdischarge care after sepsis and critical illness. Effective interventions are complex and multicomponent, targeting the multilevel challenges that survivors face. Health systems can leverage existing care models such as primary care or invest in specialty programs to deliver postdischarge care. Qualitative and implementation science studies provide insights into important contextual factors for program success. Several studies demonstrate successful application of telehealth to improve reach of postdischarge support. Research is beginning to identify subtypes of survivors that may respond to tailored intervention strategies. SUMMARY Several successful critical illness survivor models of care have been implemented and knowledge about effectiveness, cost, and implementation factors of these strategies is growing. Further innovation is needed in intervention development and evaluation to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy L Eaton
- National Clinician Scholars Program (NCSP); VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, University of Michigan Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing
| | - Stephanie Parks Taylor
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Michigan Medicine; & Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Slikke EC, Beumeler LFE, Holmqvist M, Linder A, Mankowski RT, Bouma HR. Understanding Post-Sepsis Syndrome: How Can Clinicians Help? Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16:6493-6511. [PMID: 37795206 PMCID: PMC10546999 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s390947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis is a global health challenge, with over 49 million cases annually. Recent medical advancements have increased in-hospital survival rates to approximately 80%, but the escalating incidence of sepsis, owing to an ageing population, rise in chronic diseases, and antibiotic resistance, have also increased the number of sepsis survivors. Subsequently, there is a growing prevalence of "post-sepsis syndrome" (PSS). This syndrome includes long-term physical, medical, cognitive, and psychological issues after recovering from sepsis. PSS puts survivors at risk for hospital readmission and is associated with a reduction in health- and life span, both at short and long term, after hospital discharge. Comprehensive understanding of PSS symptoms and causative factors is vital for developing optimal care for sepsis survivors, a task of prime importance for clinicians. This review aims to elucidate our current knowledge of PSS and its relevance in enhancing post-sepsis care provided by clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth C van der Slikke
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713GZ, the Netherlands
| | - Lise F E Beumeler
- Department of Intensive Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, 8934AD, the Netherlands
- Department of Sustainable Health, Campus Fryslân, University of Groningen, Groningen, 8911 CE, the Netherlands
| | - Madlene Holmqvist
- Department of Infection Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, 221 84, Sweden
| | - Adam Linder
- Department of Infection Medicine, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, 221 84, Sweden
| | - Robert T Mankowski
- Department of Physiology and Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Hjalmar R Bouma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713GZ, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713GZ, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|