Principles, applications, and future of artificial intelligence in dermatology

Improving data participation for the development of artificial intelligence in dermatology

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly impact many aspects of dermatology. The visual nature of dermatology lends itself to innovations in this space. The robustness of AI algorithms depends on the quality, quantity, and variety of data it is trained and tested on. Image collections can suffer from inconsistencies in image quality, underrepresentation of various anatomic sites and skin tones, and lack of benign counterparts leading to underperformance of algorithms in contexts other than one in which it is developed. Access to care, trust, rights, control, and transparency all play roles in the willingness of patients and healthcare providers and systems to collect, provide, and share data. Opportunities to improve data participation for the development of artificial intelligence include the establishment of data hubs and public algorithms, federated learning strategies, development of renumeration ecosystems for patients and systems, and development of criteria and mechanisms for transparency.

Can Artificial Intelligence "Hold" a Dermoscope?-The Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Translate the Dermoscopic Language

This survey represents the first endeavor to assess the clarity of the dermoscopic language by a chatbot, unveiling insights into the interplay between dermatologists and AI systems within the complexity of the dermoscopic language. Given the complex, descriptive, and metaphorical aspects of the dermoscopic language, subjective interpretations often emerge. The survey evaluated the completeness and diagnostic efficacy of chatbot-generated reports, focusing on their role in facilitating accurate diagnoses and educational opportunities for novice dermatologists. A total of 30 participants were presented with hypothetical dermoscopic descriptions of skin lesions, including dermoscopic descriptions of skin cancers such as BCC, SCC, and melanoma, skin cancer mimickers such as actinic and seborrheic keratosis, dermatofibroma, and atypical nevus, and inflammatory dermatosis such as psoriasis and alopecia areata. Each description was accompanied by specific clinical information, and the participants were tasked with assessing the differential diagnosis list generated by the AI chatbot in its initial response. In each scenario, the chatbot generated an extensive list of potential differential diagnoses, exhibiting lower performance in cases of SCC and inflammatory dermatoses, albeit without statistical significance, suggesting that the participants were equally satisfied with the responses provided. Scores decreased notably when practical descriptions of dermoscopic signs were provided. Answers to BCC scenario scores in the diagnosis category (2.9 ± 0.4) were higher than those with SCC (2.6 ± 0.66, p = 0.005) and inflammatory dermatoses (2.6 ± 0.67, p = 0). Similarly, in the teaching tool usefulness category, BCC-based chatbot differential diagnosis received higher scores (2.9 ± 0.4) compared to SCC (2.6 ± 0.67, p = 0.001) and inflammatory dermatoses (2.4 ± 0.81, p = 0). The abovementioned results underscore dermatologists' familiarity with BCC dermoscopic images while highlighting the challenges associated with interpreting rigorous dermoscopic images. Moreover, by incorporating patient characteristics such as age, phototype, or immune state, the differential diagnosis list in each case was customized to include lesion types appropriate for each category, illustrating the AI's flexibility in evaluating diagnoses and highlighting its value as a resource for dermatologists.

Artificial intelligence in dermatology: advancements and challenges in skin of color

Artificial intelligence (AI) uses algorithms and large language models in computers to simulate human-like problem-solving and decision-making. AI programs have recently acquired widespread popularity in the field of dermatology through the application of online tools in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of skin conditions. A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar analyzing recent literature (from the last 10 years through October 2023) to evaluate current AI programs in use for dermatologic purposes, identifying challenges in this technology when applied to skin of color (SOC), and proposing future steps to enhance the role of AI in dermatologic practice. Challenges surrounding AI and its application to SOC stem from the underrepresentation of SOC in datasets and issues with image quality and standardization. With these existing issues, current AI programs inevitably do worse at identifying lesions in SOC. Additionally, only 30% of the programs identified in this review had data reported on their use in dermatology, specifically in SOC. Significant development of these applications is required for the accurate depiction of darker skin tone images in datasets. More research is warranted in the future to better understand the efficacy of AI in aiding diagnosis and treatment options for SOC patients.

Machine learning algorithms in sepsis

Sepsis remains a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality and morbidity, compounded by the difficulty of early detection given its variable clinical manifestations. The integration of machine learning (ML) into laboratory medicine for timely sepsis identification and outcome forecasting is an emerging field of interest. This comprehensive review assesses the current body of research on ML applications for sepsis within the realm of laboratory diagnostics, detailing both their strengths and shortcomings. An extensive literature search was performed by two independent investigators across PubMed and Scopus databases, employing the keywords "Sepsis," "Machine Learning," and "Laboratory" without publication date limitations, culminating in January 2023. Each selected study was meticulously evaluated for various aspects, including its design, intent (diagnostic or prognostic), clinical environment, demographics, sepsis criteria, data gathering period, and the scope and nature of features, in addition to the ML methodologies and their validation procedures. Out of 135 articles reviewed, 39 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Among these, the majority (30 studies) were focused on devising ML algorithms for diagnosis, fewer (8 studies) on prognosis, and one study addressed both aspects. The dissemination of these studies across an array of journals reflects the interdisciplinary engagement in the development of ML algorithms for sepsis. This analysis highlights the promising role of ML in the early diagnosis of sepsis while drawing attention to the need for uniformity in validating models and defining features, crucial steps for ensuring the reliability and practicality of ML in clinical setting.

AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine?

The adoption of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems in healthcare is transforming the healthcare-delivery landscape. Artificial intelligence may enhance patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes, but it presents notable ethical and legal dilemmas. Moreover, as AI streamlines the analysis of the multitude of factors relevant to malpractice claims, including informed consent, adherence to standards of care, and causation, the evaluation of professional liability might also benefit from its use. Beginning with an analysis of the basic steps in assessing professional liability, this article examines the potential new medical-legal issues that an expert witness may encounter when analyzing malpractice cases and the potential integration of AI in this context. These changes related to the use of integrated AI, will necessitate efforts on the part of judges, experts, and clinicians, and may require new legislative regulations. A new expert witness will be likely necessary in the evaluation of professional liability cases. On the one hand, artificial intelligence will support the expert witness; however, on the other hand, it will introduce specific elements into the activities of healthcare workers. These elements will necessitate an expert witness with a specialized cultural background. Examining the steps of professional liability assessment indicates that the likely path for AI in legal medicine involves its role as a collaborative and integrated tool. The combination of AI with human judgment in these assessments can enhance comprehensiveness and fairness. However, it is imperative to adopt a cautious and balanced approach to prevent complete automation in this field.