Different Amounts of DNA in Newborn Cells of Escherichia coli Preclude a Role for the Chromosome in Size Control According to the "Adder" Model

The Bacterial Nucleoid: From Electron Microscopy to Polymer Physics—A Personal Recollection

In the 1960s, electron microscopy did not provide a clear answer regarding the compact or dispersed organization of the bacterial nucleoid. This was due to the necessary preparation steps of fixation and dehydration (for embedding) and freezing (for freeze-fracturing). Nevertheless, it was possible to measure the lengths of nucleoids in thin sections of slow-growing Escherichia coli cells, showing their gradual increase along with cell elongation. Later, through application of the so-called agar filtration method for electron microscopy, we were able to perform accurate measurements of cell size and shape. The introduction of confocal and fluorescence light microscopy enabled measurements of size and position of the bacterial nucleoid in living cells, inducing the concepts of “nucleoid occlusion” for localizing cell division and of “transertion” for the final step of nucleoid segregation. The question of why the DNA does not spread throughout the cytoplasm was approached by applying polymer-physical concepts of interactions between DNA and proteins. This gave a mechanistic insight in the depletion of proteins from the nucleoid, in accordance with its low refractive index observed by phase-contrast microscopy. Although in most bacterial species, the widely conserved proteins of the ParABS-system play a role in directing the segregation of newly replicated DNA strands, the basis for the separation and opposing movement of the chromosome arms was proposed to lie in preventing intermingling of nascent daughter strands already in the early replication bubble. E. coli, lacking the ParABS system, may be suitable for investigating this basic mechanism of DNA strand separation and segregation.

VirB, a key transcriptional regulator of virulence plasmid genes in Shigella flexneri, forms DNA-binding site dependent foci in the bacterial cytoplasm

VirB is a key regulator of genes located on the large virulence plasmid (pINV) in the bacterial pathogen Shigella flexneri VirB is unusual; it is not related to other transcriptional regulators, instead, it belongs to a family of proteins that primarily function in plasmid and chromosome partitioning; exemplified by ParB. Despite this, VirB does not function to segregate DNA, but rather counters transcriptional silencing mediated by the nucleoid structuring protein, H-NS. Since ParB localizes subcellularly as discrete foci in the bacterial cytoplasm, we chose to investigate the subcellular localization of VirB to gain novel insight into how VirB functions as a transcriptional anti-silencer. To do this, a GFP-VirB fusion that retains the regulatory activity of VirB and yet, does not undergo significant protein degradation in S. flexneri, was used. Surprisingly, discrete fluorescent foci were observed in live wild-type S. flexneri cells and an isogenic virB mutant using fluorescence microscopy. In contrast, foci were rarely observed (<10%) in pINV-cured cells or in cells expressing a GFP-VirB fusion carrying amino acid substitutions in the VirB DNA binding domain. Finally, the 25 bp VirB-binding site was demonstrated to be sufficient and necessary for GFP-VirB focus formation using a set of small surrogate plasmids. Combined, these data demonstrate that the VirB:DNA interactions required for the transcriptional anti-silencing activity of VirB on pINV are a prerequisite for the subcellular localization of VirB in the bacterial cytoplasm. The significance of these findings, in light of the anti-silencing activity of VirB, is discussed.ImportanceThis study reveals the subcellular localization of VirB, a key transcriptional regulator of virulence genes found on the large virulence plasmid (pINV) in Shigella. Fluorescent signals generated by an active GFP-VirB fusion form 2, 3, or 4 discrete foci in the bacterial cytoplasm, predominantly at the quarter cell position. These signals are completely dependent upon VirB interacting with its DNA binding site found either on the virulence plasmid or an engineered surrogate. Our findings: 1) provide novel insight into VirB:pINV interactions, 2) suggest that VirB may have utility as a DNA marker, and 3) raise questions about how and why this anti-silencing protein that controls virulence gene expression on pINV of Shigella spp. forms discrete foci/hubs within the bacterial cytoplasm.

Bacterial Growth Control Mechanisms Inferred from Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Single-Cell Measurements

Analysis of single-cell measurements of bacterial growth and division often relied on testing preconceived models of cell size control mechanisms. Such an approach could limit the scope of data analysis and prevent us from uncovering new information. Here, we take an "agnostic" approach by applying regression methods to multiple simultaneously measured cellular variables, which allow us to infer dependencies among those variables from their apparent correlations. Besides previously observed correlations attributed to particular cell size control mechanisms, we identify dependencies that point to potentially new mechanisms. In particular, cells born smaller than their sisters tend to grow faster and make up for the size difference acquired during division. We also find that sister cells are correlated beyond what single-cell, size-control models predict. These trends are consistently found in repeat experiments, although the dependencies vary quantitatively. Such variation highlights the sensitivity of cell growth to environmental variations and the limitation of currently used experimental setups.

Bacterial cell proliferation: from molecules to cells

Bacterial cell proliferation is highly efficient, both because bacteria grow fast and multiply with a low failure rate. This efficiency is underpinned by the robustness of the cell cycle and its synchronization with cell growth and cytokinesis. Recent advances in bacterial cell biology brought about by single-cell physiology in microfluidic chambers suggest a series of simple phenomenological models at the cellular scale, coupling cell size and growth with the cell cycle. We contrast the apparent simplicity of these mechanisms based on the addition of a constant size between cell cycle events (e.g. two consecutive initiation of DNA replication or cell division) with the complexity of the underlying regulatory networks. Beyond the paradigm of cell cycle checkpoints, the coordination between the DNA and division cycles and cell growth is largely mediated by a wealth of other mechanisms. We propose our perspective on these mechanisms, through the prism of the known crosstalk between DNA replication and segregation, cell division and cell growth or size. We argue that the precise knowledge of these molecular mechanisms is critical to integrate the diverse layers of controls at different time and space scales into synthetic and verifiable models.

A bacterial size law revealed by a coarse-grained model of cell physiology

Universal observations in Biology are sometimes described as “laws”. In E. coli, experimental studies performed over the past six decades have revealed major growth laws relating ribosomal mass fraction and cell size to the growth rate. Because they formalize complex emerging principles in biology, growth laws have been instrumental in shaping our understanding of bacterial physiology. Here, we discovered a novel size law that connects cell size to the inverse of the metabolic proteome mass fraction and the active fraction of ribosomes. We used a simple whole-cell coarse-grained model of cell physiology that combines the proteome allocation theory and the structural model of cell division. This integrated model captures all available experimental data connecting the cell proteome composition, ribosome activity, division size and growth rate in response to nutrient quality, antibiotic treatment and increased protein burden. Finally, a stochastic extension of the model explains non-trivial correlations observed in single cell experiments including the adder principle. This work provides a simple and robust theoretical framework for studying the fundamental principles of cell size determination in unicellular organisms.

Bacteria respond to environmental changes by adjusting their molecular composition, cell size and growth rate. This plasticity is thought to result from years of evolution and to be at least in part optimal for bacterial physiology. Over the past decades, quantitative studies of bacterial growth have revealed simple phenomenological relationships, called “growth laws”, which link cell size and cell composition to the growth rate. Simplified mathematical models of cell physiology are useful tools to gain quantitative understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie growth laws. For instance, these models helped explaining how optimal allocation of cellular resource to physiological processes and pathways governs the cell molecular composition in response to specific environmental conditions. In this study, we have extended and integrated existing mathematical models and used experimental data from several recent studies to understand the co-regulation of cell composition, cell size and the cellular growth rate. The model predictions uncovered a novel “size law” that links cell size to the levels of metabolic proteins and the fraction of active ribosomes present in the cell. This work provides a useful theoretical tool and a quantitative basis for understanding mechanistically bacterial physiology as a function of external conditions.

Coordination of Growth, Chromosome Replication/Segregation, and Cell Division in E. coli

Bacterial cells growing in steady state maintain a 1:1:1 relationship between an appropriate mass increase, a round of DNA replication plus sister chromosome segregation, and cell division. This is accomplished without the cell cycle engine found in eukaryotic cells. We propose here a formal logic, and an accompanying mechanism, for how such coordination could be provided in E. coli. Completion of chromosomal and divisome-related events would lead, interactively, to a “progression control complex” (PCC) which provides integrated physical coupling between sister terminus regions and the nascent septum. When a cell has both (i) achieved a sufficient mass increase, and (ii) the PCC has developed, a conformational change in the PCC occurs. This change results in “progression permission,” which triggers both onset of cell division and release of terminus regions. Release of the terminus region, in turn, directly enables a next round of replication initiation via physical changes transmitted through the nucleoid. Division and initiation are then implemented, each at its own rate and timing, according to conditions present. Importantly: (i) the limiting step for progression permission may be either completion of the growth requirement or the chromosome/divisome processes required for assembly of the PCC; and, (ii) the outcome of the proposed process is granting of permission to progress, not determination of the absolute or relative timings of downstream events. This basic logic, and the accompanying mechanism, can explain coordination of events in both slow and fast growth conditions; can accommodate diverse variations and perturbations of cellular events; and is compatible with existing mathematical descriptions of the E. coli cell cycle. Also, while our proposition is specifically designed to provide 1:1:1 coordination among basic events on a “per-cell cycle” basis, it is a small step to further envision permission progression is also the target of basic growth rate control. In such a case, the rate of mass accumulation (or its equivalent) would determine the length of the interval between successive permission events and, thus, successive cell divisions and successive replication initiations.