In vivo Selection of Imipenem Resistance Among Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant, Imipenem-Susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate With KPC-33 Carbapenemase

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

Loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at revealing the underlying mechanisms of the loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp).

METHODS

Here we longitudinally recovered 3 non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hvKp strains at a one-month interval (KP29105, KP29499 and KP30086) from an elderly male. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing, transcriptomic sequencing, gene cloning, plasmid conjugation, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) were conducted.

RESULTS

Among the 3 hvKp strains, KP29105 was resistant to the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, KP29499 acquired resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, while KP30086 restored its susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem and meropenem but retained low-level resistance to ertapenem. KP29105 and KP29499 carried plasmid-encoded genes blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-71, respectively, but KP30086 lost both. Cloning of gene blaCTX-M-71 and conjugation experiment of blaCTX-M-71-carrying plasmid showed that the transformant and transconjugant were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but had a more than 8-fold increase in MICs. Supplementation with an outer membrane permeabilizer could reduce the MIC of ceftazidime-avibactam by 32 folds, indicating that porins play a key role in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. The OmpK35 of the 3 isolates was not expressed, and the OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 had a novel amino acid substitution (L359R). SDS-PAGE and qRT-PCR showed that the expression of porin OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 was significantly down-regulated compared with KP29105.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we reported the rare ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a non-carbapenemase-producing hvKp strain. Resistance plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-71 and mutated OmpK36 had a synergetic effect on the resistance.

Ceftazidime-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles: a Promising Strategy against Clinical Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae with Different Resistance Mechanisms

Nanoparticle-based antibiotic delivery systems are essential in combating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections arising from acquired resistance and/or biofilm formation. Here, we report that the ceftazidime-decorated gold nanoparticles (CAZ_Au NPs) can effectively kill clinical ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant Enterobacteriaceae with various resistance mechanisms. Further study of underlying antibacterial mechanisms suggests that CAZ_Au NPs can damage the bacterial cell membrane and increase the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species. Moreover, CAZ_Au NPs show great potential in inhibiting biofilm formation and eradicating mature biofilms via crystal violet and scanning electron microscope assays. In addition, CAZ_Au NPs demonstrate excellent performance in improving the survival rate in the mouse model of abdominal infection. In addition, CAZ_Au NPs show no significant toxicity at bactericidal concentrations in the cell viability assay. Thus, this strategy provides a simple way to drastically improve the potency of ceftazidime as an antibiotic and its use in further biomedical applications.

The Effectiveness of Imipenem-Relebactam against Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistant Variants of the KPC-2 β-Lactamase

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved by the FDA to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales carrying bla_KPC-2. However, variants of KPC-2 with amino acid substitutions at position 179 have emerged and confer resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam.

METHODS

The activity of imipenem-relebactam was assessed against a panel of 19 KPC-2 D179 variants. KPC-2 and the D179N and D179Y variants were purified for biochemical analyses. Molecular models were constructed with imipenem to assess differences in kinetic profiles.

RESULTS

All strains were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, but resistant to ceftazidime (19/19) and ceftazidime-avibactam (18/19). KPC-2 and the D179N variant hydrolyzed imipenem, but the D179N variant's rate was much slower. The D179Y variant was unable to turnover imipenem. All three β-lactamases hydrolyzed ceftazidime at varying rates. The acylation rate of relebactam for the D179N variant was ~2.5× lower than KPC-2. Poor catalytic turnover by the D179Y variant precluded the determination of inhibitory kinetic parameters. Acyl-complexes with imipenem and ceftazidime were less prevalent with the D179N variant compared to the D179Y variant, supporting the kinetic observations that the D179Y variant was not as active as the D179N variant. Relebactam was slower to form an acyl-complex with the D179Y variant compared to avibactam. The D179Y model with imipenem revealed that the catalytic water molecule was shifted, and the carbonyl of imipenem was not within the oxyanion hole. Conversely in the D179N model, imipenem was oriented favorably for deacylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem-relebactam overcame the resistance of the D179 variants, suggesting that this combination will be active against clinical isolates harboring these derivatives of KPC-2.

In vivo adaptive antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae during antibiotic therapy

Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the leading pathogens contributing to antimicrobial resistance. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) has put the use of clinical antimicrobial agents in a dilemma. In particular, CRKP exhibiting resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline and colistin have raised great clinical concern, as these are the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of CRKP infections. Within-host evolution is a survival strategy closely related to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, while little attention has been paid to the in vivo genetic process of conversion from antibiotic-susceptible to resistant K. pneumoniae. Here we have a literature review regarding the in vivo evolution of resistance to carbapenems, ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline, and colistin in K. pneumoniae during antibacterial therapy, and summarized the detailed resistance mechanisms. In general, acquiring blaKPC and blaNDM harboring-plasmid, specific mutations in blaKPC, and porin genes, such as ompK35 and ompK36, upregulation of blaKPC, contribute to the development of carbapenem and ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in vivo. Overexpression of efflux pumps, acquiring plasmid-carrying tet (A) variants, and ribosomal protein change can lead to the adaptive evolution of tigecycline resistance. Specific mutations in chromosomes result in the cationic substitution of the phosphate groups of lipid A, thus contributing to colistin resistance. The resistant plasmid might be acquired from the co-infecting or co-colonizing strains, and the internal environment and antibiotic selection pressure contribute to the emergence of resistant mutants. The internal environment within the human host could serve as an important source of resistant K. pneumoniae strains.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the β-lactamase harboured. β-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other β-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance and Decreased Virulence in Carbapenem-Resistant ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae During Antibiotics Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a serious threat to human public health. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is currently one of the few effective antibiotics for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here, we analyzed two longitudinal Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates (FK8578, FK8695) that were isolated from an ICU patient during antimicrobial treatment. Broth microdilution method, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and comparative genomic analysis were used to elucidate the dynamics and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. String test, quantification of capsule, biofilm inhibition test and Galleria mellonella (G. mellonella) infection model were used to explore the changes in virulence of the two clinical isolates. During antibiotic treatment, CRKP FK8578 underwent a series of drug resistance and virulence changes, including CZA resistance, carbapenem susceptibility and virulence attenuation. The results of WGS showed that mutation of bla KPC-2 to bla KPC-33 was responsible for the change of drug resistance phenotype between FK8578 and FK8695. pLVPK-like virulence plasmid without siderophore synthesis operon was identified in the two strains. On the other hand, the loss of hypermucoviscosity phenotype in the FK8695 strain may be related to a single nucleotide deletion of the rmpA gene, which would further lead to a decrease in virulence. Virulence results showed that compared with FK8578, FK8695 was negative in the string test, with decreased capsular production, smaller amounts of biofilm formation and higher survival rate of G. mellonella.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of CZA resistance and decreased virulence in ST11 CRKP strains during antimicrobial treatment. It is urgent to monitor CZA resistance and timely adjust anti-infective treatment strategies.