Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the detection of pathogens in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of infants with severe pneumonia after congenital heart surgery

Metagenomic next generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids for the identification of pathogens in patients with pulmonary infection: A retrospective study

Due to the limitations of traditional laboratory methods (TMs), identification of causative pathogens of numerous pulmonary infections (PIs) remains difficult. This study evaluated the value of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) in the identification of various respiratory pathogens. A total of 207 patients with TMs and mNGS data were collected for this retrospective study. TMs included sputum culture, blood, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis, or polymerase chain reaction analysis of throat swabs. Otherwise, BALF was collected and analyzed using mNGS. For bacterial pathogens, sensitivities of mNGS as compared to TMs were 76.74 % and 58.14 % (P=0.012). For fungal pathogens, the detection rate of mNGS sensitivity was higher as compared to that of TMs (93.68 % vs 22.11 %; P<0.001). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were also greater for mNGS. Use of mNGS for BALF analysis offers good specificity and thus facilitates to the clinical diagnosis of PIs.

Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid From Neonates Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at high risk of infection. Rapid and accurate identification of pathogens is essential to improve the prognosis of children on ECMO. Metagenome next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been used in recent years to detect pathogenic bacteria, but evidence for its use in neonates on ECMO is lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using an electronic medical record system. We analyzed the results of mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of neonates receiving ECMO support with pulmonary infections in our hospital from July 2021 to January 2023.

RESULTS

We screened 18 ECMO-supported neonates with pneumonia for inclusion in the study. The median age of the included children was 2 (1-4) days, the median gestational age was 38.3 (33-40 +4 ) weeks, and the median weight was 3.3 (2.2-4.8) kg. The detection rate of mNGS was 77.8% (14/18), higher than the 44.4% (8/18) of CMT ( P = 0.04). A total of 20 pathogens were detected in mNGS, with the top 3 most common pathogens being Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli . Mixed infections were found in 14 cases (77.8%), including 13 cases (72.2%) with mixed infections detected by mNGS and 7 cases (27.8%) with mixed infections detected by CMT. A total of 9 children underwent treatment changes based on mNGS results and all of them experienced relief of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CMT, mNGS can detect pathogens earlier and more sensitively, and may play an important role in ECMO-supported neonatal pneumonia pathogen detection and optimization of antibiotic therapy.

Application value of metagenomics next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of respiratory virus infection after congenital heart surgery

Background

Timely and accurate pathogen diagnosis can be challenging in children who contract a respiratory virus following congenital heart surgery (CHS). This often results in suboptimal drug use and treatment delays. Metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a swift, efficient, and unbiased method for obtaining microbial nucleic acid sequences. This technology holds promise as a comprehensive diagnostic tool, especially for pathogens undetectable by traditional methods. However, the efficacy of mNGS in the context of congenital heart disease infections remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of mNGS for respiratory virus infections post-CHS.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who developed respiratory tract infections post-CHS and were admitted to our cardiac center between July 2021 and December 2022. The patients were categorized into the following two groups based on the diagnostic method used: (I) the mNGS group (comprising 62 patients); and (II) the conventional microbiological test (CMT) group (comprising 70 patients). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from these patients were tested to identify pathogens.

Results

The mNGS group had significantly higher detection rates for both viral infections and mixed viral infections than the CMT group (56.45% vs. 17.14%, P<0.001, and 80.00% vs. 16.67%, P<0.001, respectively). In the mNGS group, 19.35% of the patients received antiviral therapy, and 61.29% received an anti-infective regimen adjustment. Conversely, in the CMT group, only 4.29% received antiviral therapy, and 28.57% received an anti-infective regimen adjustment. A higher percentage of patients showed improved respiratory symptoms in the mNGS group than the CMT group (74.19% vs. 44.29%, P=0.001). Additionally, the mNGS group had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and a reduced length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit than the CMT group (P=0.012).

Conclusions

Using mNGS for BALF enhances the detection of respiratory viral infections and coexisting viral infections post-CHS. This facilitates more precise treatment strategies and could potentially lead to improved patient outcomes.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in non-severe and severe pneumonia patients

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used as a more promising technology than conventional tests. However, its clinical utility in the context of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for discriminating between non-severe and severe pneumonia is not well established. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of mNGS on BALF samples from 100 individuals suspected of pneumonia, and compared it with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) of BALF samples and the final clinical diagnosis. Twenty-seven cases of non-severe pneumonia and 73 cases of severe pneumonia patients were finally clinically diagnosed. Among 100 cases, diagnostic performance of mNGS and culture showed a significant difference; 65 cases had the same sample types, of which 25 cases were diagnosed as positive by mNGS only (38.46%) and 1 was diagnosed as positive by culture only (1.54%). Moreover, 24 cases were diagnosed positive in both mNGS and culture (36.92%) and 15 cases tested negative in both mNGS and culture (23.08%). Among 35 cases, 28 out of 35 cases were diagnosed as positive by mNGS, while only 4 out of 35 cases were diagnosed as positive by the indirect immunofluorescence method (IIFT). In addition, the positive rate of mNGS was higher than that of culture in cases regardless of prior antibiotic exposure. Mixed pathogens were found to be significantly more prevalent in severe pneumonia patients than in non-severe pneumonia patients. Importantly, among 38 cases who were diagnosed solely by mNGS, 25 patients experienced an improved outcome after physicians changed the therapy according to the mNGS results. In conclusion, the results showed that mNGS of BALF represents a potentially effective tool for detection of mixed pathogens in severe pneumonia.