1
|
Connelly CF, Desai N, Cimic A, Gonzalez AA, Baskota SU. A six-year comprehensive review of eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital. Diagn Cytopathol 2024. [PMID: 38808690 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ocular cytology is an effective method of diagnosing infective, benign, and malignant ocular disease processes due to easy accessibility and rapid turnaround time. However, these specimens pose significant diagnostic challenges due to rarity of the specimen type, sparse diagnostic material available for ancillary workup, and unfamiliarity of the diagnostic entities by the cytopathologist. METHODS This study conducted a 6-year comprehensive review of 65 eye cytology cases received at a tertiary level hospital. Cytopathologic diagnoses of "negative for malignancy" and "atypical" were categorized as negative findings (70.8%, n = 46) and diagnoses of "suspicious for malignancy" and "positive for malignancy" were categorized as positive findings (23.1%, n = 15). A 44.6% (n = 29) of cases had subsequent histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses. Premalignant and malignant lesions detected on histopathology were considered as significant findings. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the concordance of ocular cytology with associated histopathology and/or flow cytometry diagnoses. RESULTS The accuracy of final cytology-histopathology and/or cytology-flow cytometry diagnoses in this cohort of cases is 86.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 66.6% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ocular diagnosis by cytology are 100% and 80.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Ocular cytology is a fast, effective, and sensitive method for diagnosing ocular pathology specimens. Familiarity with these specimen types by cytopathologists can help in diagnosing ocular diseases effectively on small, challenging cytologic preparations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney F Connelly
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Niyati Desai
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adela Cimic
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abel A Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milman T, Grossniklaus HE, Goldman-Levy G, Kivelä TT, Coupland SE, White VA, Mudhar HS, Eberhart CG, Verdijk RM, Heegaard S, Gill AJ, Jager MJ, Rodríguez-Reyes AA, Esmaeli B, Hodge JC, Cree IA. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Orbit. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2023; 9:71-95. [PMID: 37900189 PMCID: PMC10601864 DOI: 10.1159/000530730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana Milman
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hans E. Grossniklaus
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gabrielle Goldman-Levy
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Tero T. Kivelä
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Valerie A. White
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Hardeep Singh Mudhar
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charles G. Eberhart
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Abelardo A. Rodríguez-Reyes
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ian A. Cree
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - on behalf of the WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
- Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- George Holt Chair of Pathology/Consultant Histopathologist, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service (NSOPS), Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- Departments of Pathology and Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section and Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards NSW, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, I.A.P. Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, MDAnderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McKay KM, Nishath T, Grieco VS, Stacey AW. Diagnostic Confirmation of Choroidal Lymphoma by Anterior Chamber Paracentesis and Aqueous Fluid Flow Cytometry. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2023:1-6. [PMID: 36637999 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2162421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the clinical course of patients with diagnostic confirmation of choroidal lymphoma by anterior chamber paracentesis and aqueous fluid flow cytometry. METHODS Single-center case series. RESULTS Two patients with choroidal thickening were suspected to have choroidal lymphoma based on clinical findings and ultrasonographic evidence of extrascleral extension. In each case, anterior chamber paracentesis was performed due to the observation of the associated anterior chamber reaction. Flow cytometry detected the presence of a clonal B-cell population consistent with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In one case, external beam radiation therapy resulted in a complete therapeutic response. More invasive methods of ocular tissue biopsy were avoided. CONCLUSIONS Definitive diagnosis in suspected cases of choroidal lymphoma remains challenging. Ocular fluid sampling may be a low morbidity and convenient alternative for confirming a suspected diagnosis in cases associated with cellular infiltration of the intraocular fluids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Matthew McKay
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Thamanna Nishath
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Verena S Grieco
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew W Stacey
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim Y, Shin S, Lee ST, Lee CS. A Case of Spontaneous Regression and Recurrence of Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022; 30:1980-1983. [PMID: 34255584 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2021.1916040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a case of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) showing recurrence after spontaneous regression, diagnosed with the aid of next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS Retrospective case report. RESULTS A 61-year-old immunocompetent Korean woman presented with subretinal lesions suspected of PVRL, which resolved spontaneously in 2 months. After 8 months, the lesion recurred and diagnostic vitrectomy was performed. The cytologic examination of the vitreous was indeterminate as there was only minimal vitreous opacity present at the time of surgery. NGS identified significant mutations including single nucleotide variants in MYD88 L265P, which is a unique hallmark of VRL, in vitreous sample, and the diagnosis of PVRL was made. CONCLUSION This case showed PVRL can spontaneously regress almost completely, then recur, so careful ophthalmic and systemic follow-ups are warranted. When cytological confirmation is challenging due to the minimal disease involvement in the vitreous, NGS is effective in confirming the mutation profiles of PVRL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeji Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Christopher Seungkyu Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: Current Diagnostic Laboratory Tests and New Emerging Molecular Tools. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6908-6921. [PMID: 36290820 PMCID: PMC9600627 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), a rare aggressive malignancy primarily involving the retina and/or the vitreous, is a major diagnostic challenge for clinicians (who commonly misdiagnose it as chronic uveitis) as well as for pathologists (for biological and technical reasons). Delays in diagnosis and treatment are responsible for visual impairments and life-threatening consequences, usually related to central nervous system involvement. The identification of lymphoma cells in vitreous fluid, obtained by vitrectomy, is required for diagnosis. Of note, the scarcity of neoplastic cells in small volumes of vitreous sample, and the fragility of lymphoma cells with degenerative changes caused by previous steroid use for presumed uveitis makes diagnosis based on cytology plus immunophenotyping difficult. Interleukin levels, immunoglobulin heavy chain or T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, and MYD88 mutation are applied in combination with cytology to support diagnosis. We aim to describe the current laboratory technologies for PVRL diagnosis, focusing on the main issues that these methods have. In addition, new emerging diagnostic strategies, such as next-generation sequencing analysis, are discussed. The genetic profile of PVRL remains largely unexplored. Better knowledge of genetic alterations is critical for precision medicine interventions with target-based treatments of this lymphoma for which no standardised treatment protocol currently exists.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhuang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang M, Zou D, Zhang L, Jia C, Zhang W. Circulating cell-free DNA and IL-10 from cerebrospinal fluids aid primary vitreoretinal lymphoma diagnosis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:955080. [PMID: 36059608 PMCID: PMC9434796 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare variant of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) that presents diagnostic challenges. Here, we focused on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) isolated from cerebrospinal fluid. Twenty-three VRL patients (17 PVRL, 2 PCNSL/O, and 4 relapsed VRL, from 10/2018 to 12/2021) and 8 uveitis patients were included in this study. CSF samples from 19 vitreoretinal lymphoma patients had sufficient cfDNA for next-generation sequencing. Of these patients, 73.7% (14/19) had at least one meaningful non-Hodgkin lymphoma-related mutation. The characteristic MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in the CSF of 12 VRL patients, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 63.2%, 100%, 100%, and 46.2%, respectively. No meaningful lymphoma related mutations were found in CSF samples from uveitis controls with typical intraocular lesions. Meanwhile, CSF IL-10 levels were elevated in 95.7% of the VRL patients, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 95.7%, 100%, 100% and 88.9%, respectively. Key somatic mutations like MYD88 L265P and CD79B detected from CSF cfDNA and elevated CSF IL-10 levels can be promising adjuncts for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zhuang
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Meifen Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongmei Zou
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Congwei Jia
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Wei Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|