1
|
Elahi LS, Condro MC, Kawaguchi R, Qin Y, Alvarado AG, Gruender B, Qi H, Li T, Lai A, Castro MG, Lowenstein PR, Garrett MC, Kornblum HI. Valproic acid targets IDH1 mutants through alteration of lipid metabolism. NPJ METABOLIC HEALTH AND DISEASE 2024; 2:20. [PMID: 39149696 PMCID: PMC11321993 DOI: 10.1038/s44324-024-00021-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have a wide range of targets and can rewire both the chromatin and lipidome of cancer cells. In this study, we show that valproic acid (VPA), a brain penetrant anti-seizure medication and histone deacetylase inhibitor, inhibits the growth of IDH1 mutant tumors in vivo and in vitro, with at least some selectivity over IDH1 wild-type tumors. Surprisingly, genes upregulated by VPA showed no enhanced chromatin accessibility at the promoter, but there was a correlation between VPA-downregulated genes and diminished promoter chromatin accessibility. VPA inhibited the transcription of lipogenic genes and these lipogenic genes showed significant decreases in promoter chromatin accessibility only in the IDH1 MT glioma cell lines tested. VPA inhibited the mTOR pathway and a key lipogenic gene, fatty acid synthase (FASN). Both VPA and a selective FASN inhibitor TVB-2640 rewired the lipidome and promoted apoptosis in an IDH1 MT but not in an IDH1 WT glioma cell line. We further find that HDACs are involved in the regulation of lipogenic genes and HDAC6 is particularly important for the regulation of FASN in IDH1 MT glioma. Finally, we show that FASN knockdown alone and VPA in combination with FASN knockdown significantly improved the survival of mice in an IDH1 MT primary orthotopic xenograft model in vivo. We conclude that targeting fatty acid metabolism through HDAC inhibition and/or FASN inhibition may be a novel therapeutic opportunity in IDH1 mutant gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubayna S. Elahi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Michael C. Condro
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Riki Kawaguchi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Yue Qin
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Alvaro G. Alvarado
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Brandon Gruender
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Haocheng Qi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Tie Li
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Albert Lai
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Maria G. Castro
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Pedro R. Lowenstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | | | - Harley I. Kornblum
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the UCLA Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Melkus G, Sizovs A, Rucevskis P, Silina S. Transcriptional Hubs Within Cliques in Ensemble Hi-C Chromatin Interaction Networks. J Comput Biol 2024; 31:589-596. [PMID: 38768423 DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2024.0515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Chromatin conformation capture technologies permit the study of chromatin spatial organization on a genome-wide scale at a variety of resolutions. Despite the increasing precision and resolution of high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) methods, it remains challenging to conclusively link transcriptional activity to spatial organizational phenomena. We have developed a clique-based approach for analyzing Hi-C data that helps identify chromosomal hotspots that feature considerable enrichment of chromatin annotations for transcriptional start sites and, building on previously published work, show that these chromosomal hotspots are not only significantly enriched in RNA polymerase II binding sites as identified by the ENCODE project, but also identify a noticeable increase in FANTOM5 and GTEx transcription within our identified cliques across a variety of tissue types. From the obtained data, we surmise that our cliques are a suitable method for identifying transcription factories in Hi-C data, and outline further extensions to the method that may make it useful for locating regions of increased transcriptional activity in datasets where in-depth expression or polymerase data may not be available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gatis Melkus
- Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Andrejs Sizovs
- Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Peteris Rucevskis
- Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Sandra Silina
- Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rengifo Rojas C, Cercy J, Perillous S, Gonthier-Guéret C, Montibus B, Maupetit-Méhouas S, Espinadel A, Dupré M, Hong CC, Hata K, Nakabayashi K, Plagge A, Bouschet T, Arnaud P, Vaillant I, Court F. Biallelic non-productive enhancer-promoter interactions precede imprinted expression of Kcnk9 during mouse neural commitment. HGG ADVANCES 2024; 5:100271. [PMID: 38297831 PMCID: PMC10869267 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
It is only partially understood how constitutive allelic methylation at imprinting control regions (ICRs) interacts with other regulation levels to drive timely parental allele-specific expression along large imprinted domains. The Peg13-Kcnk9 domain is an imprinted domain with important brain functions. To gain insights into its regulation during neural commitment, we performed an integrative analysis of its allele-specific epigenetic, transcriptomic, and cis-spatial organization using a mouse stem cell-based corticogenesis model that recapitulates the control of imprinted gene expression during neurodevelopment. We found that, despite an allelic higher-order chromatin structure associated with the paternally CTCF-bound Peg13 ICR, enhancer-Kcnk9 promoter contacts occurred on both alleles, although they were productive only on the maternal allele. This observation challenges the canonical model in which CTCF binding isolates the enhancer and its target gene on either side and suggests a more nuanced role for allelic CTCF binding at some ICRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Rengifo Rojas
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jil Cercy
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sophie Perillous
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Céline Gonthier-Guéret
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bertille Montibus
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Stéphanie Maupetit-Méhouas
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Astrid Espinadel
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marylou Dupré
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Charles C Hong
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kenichiro Hata
- Department of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan; Department of Human Molecular Genetics, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine 3-39-22 Showa, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Nakabayashi
- Department of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan
| | - Antonius Plagge
- Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tristan Bouschet
- Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Arnaud
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Isabelle Vaillant
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Franck Court
- Genetics, Reproduction and Development Institute (iGReD), CNRS, INSERM, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Willemin A, Szabó D, Pombo A. Epigenetic regulatory layers in the 3D nucleus. Mol Cell 2024; 84:415-428. [PMID: 38242127 PMCID: PMC10872226 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Nearly 7 decades have elapsed since Francis Crick introduced the central dogma of molecular biology, as part of his ideas on protein synthesis, setting the fundamental rules of sequence information transfer from DNA to RNAs and proteins. We have since learned that gene expression is finely tuned in time and space, due to the activities of RNAs and proteins on regulatory DNA elements, and through cell-type-specific three-dimensional conformations of the genome. Here, we review major advances in genome biology and discuss a set of ideas on gene regulation and highlight how various biomolecular assemblies lead to the formation of structural and regulatory features within the nucleus, with roles in transcriptional control. We conclude by suggesting further developments that will help capture the complex, dynamic, and often spatially restricted events that govern gene expression in mammalian cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andréa Willemin
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Epigenetic Regulation and Chromatin Architecture Group, Berlin, Germany; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Biology, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dominik Szabó
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Epigenetic Regulation and Chromatin Architecture Group, Berlin, Germany; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Biology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ana Pombo
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Epigenetic Regulation and Chromatin Architecture Group, Berlin, Germany; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Biology, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Umarov R, Hon CC. Enhancer target prediction: state-of-the-art approaches and future prospects. Biochem Soc Trans 2023; 51:1975-1988. [PMID: 37830459 DOI: 10.1042/bst20230917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Enhancers are genomic regions that regulate gene transcription and are located far away from the transcription start sites of their target genes. Enhancers are highly enriched in disease-associated variants and thus deciphering the interactions between enhancers and genes is crucial to understanding the molecular basis of genetic predispositions to diseases. Experimental validations of enhancer targets can be laborious. Computational methods have thus emerged as a valuable alternative for studying enhancer-gene interactions. A variety of computational methods have been developed to predict enhancer targets by incorporating genomic features (e.g. conservation, distance, and sequence), epigenomic features (e.g. histone marks and chromatin contacts) and activity measurements (e.g. covariations of enhancer activity and gene expression). With the recent advances in genome perturbation and chromatin conformation capture technologies, data on experimentally validated enhancer targets are becoming available for supervised training of these methods and evaluation of their performance. In this review, we categorize enhancer target prediction methods based on their rationales and approaches. Then we discuss their merits and limitations and highlight the future directions for enhancer targets prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzan Umarov
- RIKEN Centre for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama RIKEN Institute, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Chung-Chau Hon
- RIKEN Centre for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama RIKEN Institute, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schaeffer M, Nollmann M. Contributions of 3D chromatin structure to cell-type-specific gene regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2023; 79:102032. [PMID: 36893484 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are organized in 3D in a multiscale manner, and different mechanisms acting at each of these scales can contribute to transcriptional regulation. However, the large single-cell variability in 3D chromatin structures represents a challenge to understand how transcription may be differentially regulated between cell types in a robust and efficient manner. Here, we describe the different mechanisms by which 3D chromatin structure was shown to contribute to cell-type-specific transcriptional regulation. Excitingly, several novel methodologies able to measure 3D chromatin conformation and transcription in single cells in their native tissue context, or to detect the dynamics of cis-regulatory interactions, are starting to allow quantitative dissection of chromatin structure noise and relate it to how transcription may be regulated between different cell types and cell states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Schaeffer
- Centre de Biologie Structurale, Univ Montpellier, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, Montpellier, France
| | - Marcelo Nollmann
- Centre de Biologie Structurale, Univ Montpellier, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|