Motor Adaptation in Parkinson's Disease During Prolonged Walking in Response to Corrective Acoustic Messages

Boost your brain: a simple 100% normobaric oxygen treatment improves human motor learning processes

Introduction

Human motor learning processes are a fundamental part of our daily lives and can be adversely affected by neurologic conditions. Motor learning largely depends on successfully integrating cognitive and motor-related sensory information, and a simple, easily accessible treatment that could enhance such processes would be exciting and clinically impactful. Normobaric 100% oxygen treatment (NbOxTr) is often used as a first-line intervention to improve survival rates of brain cells in neurological trauma, and recent work indicates that improvements in elements crucial for cognitive-motor-related functions can occur during NbOxTr. However, whether NbOxTr can enhance the motor learning processes of healthy human brains is unknown. Here, we investigated whether a brief NbOxTr administered via nasal cannula improves motor learning processes during a visuomotor adaptation task where participants adapt to a visual distortion between visual feedback and hand movements.

Methods

40 healthy young adults (M = 21 years) were randomly assigned to a NbOxTr (N = 20; 100% oxygen) or air (N = 20; regular air) group and went through four typical visuomotor adaptation phases (Baseline, Adaptation, After-Effect, Refresher). Gas treatment (flow rate 5 L/min) was only administered during the Adaptation phase of the visuomotor experiment, in both groups.

Results

The NbOxTr provided during the Adaptation phase led to significantly faster and about 30% improved learning (p < 0.05). Notably, these motor learning improvements consolidated into the subsequent experiment phases, i.e., after the gas treatment was terminated (p < 0.05).

Discussion

We conclude that this simple and brief NbOxTr dramatically improved fundamental human motor learning processes and may provide promising potential for neurorehabilitation and skill-learning approaches. Further studies should investigate whether similar improvements exist in elderly and neurologically impaired individuals, other motor learning tasks, and also long-lasting effects.

Need for personalized monitoring of Parkinson's disease: the perspectives of patients and specialized healthcare providers

Background

Digital tools such as wearable sensors may help to monitor Parkinson's disease (PD) in daily life. To optimally achieve the expected benefits, such as personized care and improved self-management, it is essential to understand the perspective of both patients and the healthcare providers.

Objectives

We identified the motivations for and barriers against monitoring PD symptoms among PD patients and healthcare providers. We also investigated which aspects of PD were considered most important to monitor in daily life, and which benefits and limitations of wearable sensors were expected.

Methods

Online questionnaires were completed by 434 PD patients and 166 healthcare providers who were specialized in PD care (86 physiotherapists, 55 nurses, and 25 neurologists). To gain further understanding in the main findings, we subsequently conducted homogeneous focus groups with patients (n = 14), physiotherapists (n = 5), and nurses (n = 6), as well as individual interviews with neurologists (n = 5).

Results

One third of the patients had monitored their PD symptoms in the past year, most commonly using a paper diary. Key motivations were: (1) discuss findings with healthcare providers, (2) obtain insight in the effect of medication and other treatments, and (3) follow the progression of the disease. Key barriers were: (1) not wanting to focus too much on having PD, (2) symptoms being relatively stable, and (3) lacking an easy-to-use tool. Prioritized symptoms of interest differed between patients and healthcare providers; patients gave a higher priority to fatigue, problems with fine motor movements and tremor, whereas professionals more frequently prioritized balance, freezing and hallucinations. Although both patients and healthcare providers were generally positive about the potential of wearable sensors for monitoring PD symptoms, the expected benefits and limitations varied considerably between groups and within the patient group.

Conclusion

This study provides detailed information about the perspectives of patients, physiotherapists, nurses and neurologists on the merits of monitoring PD in daily life. The identified priorities differed considerably between patients and professionals, and this information is critical when defining the development and research agenda for the coming years. We also noted considerable differences in priorities between individual patients, highlighting the need for personalized disease monitoring.

Effort-Based Decision-Making and Gross Motor Performance: Are They Linked?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between effort-based decision making and gross motor performance. Effort-based decision making was measured using a modified version of the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), in which participants pressed a button on a keyboard to fill a bar on a screen for monetary reward. Participants received monetary rewards that were commensurate with the level of effort that they were willing to expend. Gross motor performance was measured with a walking task, in which participants matched their steps to the beat of an audio metronome; they walked to metronome beats that were slower and also faster than their normal walking pace. We hypothesized that increased effort during the effort-based decision making task would be paired with an increase in steps taken per minute during the gross motor task. However, the results of this study indicated a lack of a statistically significant relationship between the effort-based decision making task and the gross motor task. Planning rather than decision-making may have been the cognitive construct that governed our gross motor task. These findings can be beneficial when thinking about potential interventions for populations who experience deficits in motor performance and cognition as well as for understanding the relationship between both cognitive and motor performance in healthy adults.