Long-Term Outcomes of Elderly Brain Arteriovenous Malformations After Different Management Modalities: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Influence of preoperative embolisation on resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: cohort study

PURPOSE

Preoperative endovascular embolisation is a widely used adjunct for the surgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, whether this improves completeness of AVM resection is unknown, as previous analyses have not adjusted for potential confounding factors. We aimed to determine if preoperative endovascular embolisation was associated with increased rate of complete AVM resection at first surgery, following adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grade items.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of all patients undergoing first ever AVM resection in a specialist neurosciences unit in the NHS Lothian Health Board region of Scotland between June 2004 and June 2022. Data was prospectively extracted from medical records. Our primary outcome was completeness of AVM resection. We determined the odds of complete AVM resection using binomial logistic regression with adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grading system items: maximum nidus diameter, eloquence of adjacent brain and the presence of deep venous drainage.

RESULTS

88 patients (median age 40y [IQR 19-53], 55% male) underwent AVM resection. 34/88 (39%) patients underwent preoperative embolisation and complete resection was achieved at first surgery in 74/88 (84%). Preoperative embolisation was associated with increased adjusted odds of complete AVM resection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.6 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7-67.7]; p = 0.017). The presence of deep venous drainage was associated with reduced chance of complete AVM resection (aOR 0.18 [95% CI 0.04-0.63]; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative embolisation is associated with improved chances of complete AVM resection following adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grade, and should therefore be considered when planning surgical resection of AVMs.

Primary Embolization of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations With Intention to Cure: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involves multiple approaches, including embolization, microsurgical resection, and radiosurgery. With the advent of new embolisates, dual-lumen balloon catheters, detachable tip microcatheters, and transvenous embolization, endovascular AVM obliteration has become more effective. Although adjuvant embolization and embolization are commonly used, the safety and effectiveness of curative embolization remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with AVMs who underwent primary embolization with the intention to cure. We collected data on patient characteristics, AVM features, complications, and radiographic and clinical outcomes for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 25 studies with a total of 1425 patients with 1427 AVMs who underwent curative embolization. Of these patients, 70% were low grade (pooled = 61% [39-82]), 67% were <3 cm (pooled = 78% [60-92]), and 75% were in superficial locations (pooled = 80% [72-86]). At last radiographic follow-up (mean, 16.7 ± 10.9 months), the full obliteration rate was 52% (pooled = 61% [43-77]) and retreatment rate was 25% (pooled = 17% [8.3-27]). At last clinical follow-up (mean, 24.2 ± 13.3 months), the poor clinical outcome rate was 7.9% (pooled = 4.4% [1.3-8.7]) and symptomatic complication rate was 13% (pooled = 13% [8-19]). There was no significant difference in the rate of radiographic cure, need for retreatment, and poor outcomes between ruptured and unruptured AVMs. Symptomatic complications were more common in the treatment of unruptured AVMs. The primary outcomes showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 72%-94%).

CONCLUSION

Curative embolization of AVM is primarily reserved for small and low-grade AVMs, with highly variable outcomes. Our findings suggest poor radiographic outcomes and increased risk of complications. Outcomes are highly dependent on patient selection and technique used. Large multicenter prospective studies are required to further guide patient selection, categorize clinical and radiographic outcomes, and identify subgroup of patients that may benefit from curative embolization.

Long-term outcomes of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the risk and benefit profile of microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as the first-line treatment for unruptured and ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors included AVMs underwent MS or SRS as the first-line treatment from a nationwide prospective multicenter registry in mainland China. The authors used propensity score-matched methods to balance baseline characteristics between the MS and SRS groups. The primary outcomes were long-term hemorrhagic stroke or death, and the secondary outcomes were long-term obliteration and neurological outcomes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses with different study designs were performed to confirm the stability of our findings.

RESULTS

Of the 4286 consecutive AVMs in the registry from August 2011 to December 2021; 1604 patients were eligible. After matching, 244 unruptured and 442 ruptured AVMs remained for the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 7.0 years in the unruptured group and 6.1 years in the ruptured group. In the comparison of primary outcomes, SRS was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death both in the unruptured and ruptured AVMs (unruptured: hazard ratio 4.06, 95% CI: 1.15-14.41; ruptured: hazard ratio 4.19, 95% CI: 1.58-11.15). In terms of the secondary outcomes, SRS was also observed to have a significant disadvantage in long-term obliteration [unruptured: odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.04; ruptured: OR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05-0.15]. However, it should be noted that SRS may have advantages in preventing neurofunctional decline (unruptured: OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.14; ruptured: OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.76). The results of subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were consistent in trend but with slightly varied powers.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice-based real-world study comprehensively compared MS and SRS for AVMs with long-term outcomes. MS is more effective in preventing future hemorrhage or death and achieving obliteration, while the risk of neurofunctional decline should not be ignored.

Association of nidus size and rupture in brain arteriovenous malformations: Insight from angioarchitecture and hemodynamics

This study aims to investigate the correlation between AVM size and rupture by examining natural history, angioarchitecture characteristics, and quantitative hemodynamics. A retrospective review of 90 consecutive AVMs from the MATCH registry was conducted. Patients were categorized into small nidus (< 3 cm) and large nidus (≥ 3 cm) groups based on the Spetzler-Martin grading system. Natural history analysis used prospective cohort survival data, while imaging analysis examined angioarchitecture characteristics and quantitative hemodynamic parameters measured with QDSA. The small-nidus group had a significantly higher annualized rupture risk (2.3% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.011). Cross-sectional imaging revealed independent hemorrhagic risk factors, including small nidus (OR, 4.801; 95%CI, 1.280-18.008; p = 0.020) and draining vein stenosis (OR, 6.773; 95%CI, 1.179-38.911; p = 0.032). Hemodynamic analysis identified higher stasis index in the feeding artery (OR, 2.442; 95%CI, 1.074-5.550; p = 0.033), higher stasis index in the draining vein (OR, 11.812; 95%CI, 1.907-73.170; p = 0.008), and lower outflow gradient in the draining vein (OR, 1.658; 95%CI, 1.068-2.574; p = 0.024) as independent predictors of AVM rupture. The small nidus group also showed a higher likelihood of being associated with hemorrhagic risk factors. Small AVM nidus has a higher risk of rupture based on natural history, angioarchitecture, and hemodynamics. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT04572568.

Microsurgery versus Microsurgery With Preoperative Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative embolization has traditionally been regarded as a safe and effective adjunct to microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM). However, there is currently no high-level evidence to ascertain this presumption.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of microsurgery (MS) vs microsurgery with preoperative embolization (E + MS) in patients with bAVM through systematic review.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was bAVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative bleeding (mL), complications, worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality. The pooled proportions of outcomes were calculated through the logit transformation method. The odds ratio (OR) of categorical data and mean difference of continuous data were estimated through the Mantel-Haenszel and the inverse variance methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight patients were treated by microsurgery alone, and 1088 were treated by microsurgery with preoperative embolization, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in AVM obliteration (94.1% vs 95.6%, OR = 1.15 [0.63-2.11], P = .65), mortality (1.7% vs 2%, OR = 0.88 [0.30-2.58], P = .82), procedural complications (18.2% vs 27.2%, OR = 0.47 [0.19-1.17], P = .10), worsened mRS (21.2% vs 18.5%, OR = 1.08 [0.33-3.54], P = .9), and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = 182.89 [-87.76, 453.55], P = .19).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in AVM obliteration, mortality, complications, worse mRS, and intraoperative blood loss between MS and E + MS groups. For AVMs where MS alone has acceptable results, it is reasonable to bypass unnecessary preoperative embolization given higher postoperative complication risk.