1
|
Lee SH, Loan JJ, Downer J, DuPlessis J, Keston P, Wiggins AN, Fouyas I, Sokol D. Influence of preoperative embolisation on resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: cohort study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:345. [PMID: 39167231 PMCID: PMC11339179 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06234-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative endovascular embolisation is a widely used adjunct for the surgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, whether this improves completeness of AVM resection is unknown, as previous analyses have not adjusted for potential confounding factors. We aimed to determine if preoperative endovascular embolisation was associated with increased rate of complete AVM resection at first surgery, following adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grade items. METHODS We identified a cohort of all patients undergoing first ever AVM resection in a specialist neurosciences unit in the NHS Lothian Health Board region of Scotland between June 2004 and June 2022. Data was prospectively extracted from medical records. Our primary outcome was completeness of AVM resection. We determined the odds of complete AVM resection using binomial logistic regression with adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grading system items: maximum nidus diameter, eloquence of adjacent brain and the presence of deep venous drainage. RESULTS 88 patients (median age 40y [IQR 19-53], 55% male) underwent AVM resection. 34/88 (39%) patients underwent preoperative embolisation and complete resection was achieved at first surgery in 74/88 (84%). Preoperative embolisation was associated with increased adjusted odds of complete AVM resection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.6 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7-67.7]; p = 0.017). The presence of deep venous drainage was associated with reduced chance of complete AVM resection (aOR 0.18 [95% CI 0.04-0.63]; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative embolisation is associated with improved chances of complete AVM resection following adjustment for Spetzler-Martin grade, and should therefore be considered when planning surgical resection of AVMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Hoon Lee
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- South West Neurosurgery Centre, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - James Jm Loan
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Jonathan Downer
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Johannes DuPlessis
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Keston
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anthony N Wiggins
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ioannis Fouyas
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dabhi N, Sokolowski J, Zanaty M, Kellogg RT, Park MS, Mastorakos P. Primary Embolization of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations With Intention to Cure: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01190. [PMID: 38842298 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) involves multiple approaches, including embolization, microsurgical resection, and radiosurgery. With the advent of new embolisates, dual-lumen balloon catheters, detachable tip microcatheters, and transvenous embolization, endovascular AVM obliteration has become more effective. Although adjuvant embolization and embolization are commonly used, the safety and effectiveness of curative embolization remain unclear. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with AVMs who underwent primary embolization with the intention to cure. We collected data on patient characteristics, AVM features, complications, and radiographic and clinical outcomes for meta-analysis. RESULTS We identified 25 studies with a total of 1425 patients with 1427 AVMs who underwent curative embolization. Of these patients, 70% were low grade (pooled = 61% [39-82]), 67% were <3 cm (pooled = 78% [60-92]), and 75% were in superficial locations (pooled = 80% [72-86]). At last radiographic follow-up (mean, 16.7 ± 10.9 months), the full obliteration rate was 52% (pooled = 61% [43-77]) and retreatment rate was 25% (pooled = 17% [8.3-27]). At last clinical follow-up (mean, 24.2 ± 13.3 months), the poor clinical outcome rate was 7.9% (pooled = 4.4% [1.3-8.7]) and symptomatic complication rate was 13% (pooled = 13% [8-19]). There was no significant difference in the rate of radiographic cure, need for retreatment, and poor outcomes between ruptured and unruptured AVMs. Symptomatic complications were more common in the treatment of unruptured AVMs. The primary outcomes showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 72%-94%). CONCLUSION Curative embolization of AVM is primarily reserved for small and low-grade AVMs, with highly variable outcomes. Our findings suggest poor radiographic outcomes and increased risk of complications. Outcomes are highly dependent on patient selection and technique used. Large multicenter prospective studies are required to further guide patient selection, categorize clinical and radiographic outcomes, and identify subgroup of patients that may benefit from curative embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha Dabhi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Jennifer Sokolowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Mario Zanaty
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Ryan T Kellogg
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Min S Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han H, Gao D, Ma L, Li R, Li Z, Zhang H, Yuan K, Wang K, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Jin W, Jin H, Meng X, Yan D, Li R, Lin F, Hao Q, Wang H, Ye X, Kang S, Pu J, Shi Z, Chao X, Lin Z, Lu J, Li Y, Zhao Y, Sun S, Chen Y, Chen X, Wang S. Long-term outcomes of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3983-3992. [PMID: 37720924 PMCID: PMC10720861 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the risk and benefit profile of microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as the first-line treatment for unruptured and ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors included AVMs underwent MS or SRS as the first-line treatment from a nationwide prospective multicenter registry in mainland China. The authors used propensity score-matched methods to balance baseline characteristics between the MS and SRS groups. The primary outcomes were long-term hemorrhagic stroke or death, and the secondary outcomes were long-term obliteration and neurological outcomes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses with different study designs were performed to confirm the stability of our findings. RESULTS Of the 4286 consecutive AVMs in the registry from August 2011 to December 2021; 1604 patients were eligible. After matching, 244 unruptured and 442 ruptured AVMs remained for the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 7.0 years in the unruptured group and 6.1 years in the ruptured group. In the comparison of primary outcomes, SRS was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death both in the unruptured and ruptured AVMs (unruptured: hazard ratio 4.06, 95% CI: 1.15-14.41; ruptured: hazard ratio 4.19, 95% CI: 1.58-11.15). In terms of the secondary outcomes, SRS was also observed to have a significant disadvantage in long-term obliteration [unruptured: odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.04; ruptured: OR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05-0.15]. However, it should be noted that SRS may have advantages in preventing neurofunctional decline (unruptured: OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.14; ruptured: OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.76). The results of subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were consistent in trend but with slightly varied powers. CONCLUSIONS This clinical practice-based real-world study comprehensively compared MS and SRS for AVMs with long-term outcomes. MS is more effective in preventing future hemorrhage or death and achieving obliteration, while the risk of neurofunctional decline should not be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heze Han
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | | | - Li Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Ruinan Li
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Zhipeng Li
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Haibin Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Kexin Yuan
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Ke Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Yukun Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University
| | - Weitao Jin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University
| | - Hengwei Jin
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Xiangyu Meng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
| | - Debin Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Shanxi
| | - Runting Li
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Fa Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Qiang Hao
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Xun Ye
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Shuai Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Jun Pu
- First Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming
| | - Zhiyong Shi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu
| | - Xiaofeng Chao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu
| | - Zhengfeng Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First People’s Hospital of Qinzhou, Guangxi
| | - Junlin Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Youxiang Li
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Yuanli Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | | | - Yu Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Xiaolin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| | - Shuo Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li R, Chen P, Han H, Li Z, Chen X, Chen Y, Zhao Y. Association of nidus size and rupture in brain arteriovenous malformations: Insight from angioarchitecture and hemodynamics. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:216. [PMID: 37650957 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02113-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the correlation between AVM size and rupture by examining natural history, angioarchitecture characteristics, and quantitative hemodynamics. A retrospective review of 90 consecutive AVMs from the MATCH registry was conducted. Patients were categorized into small nidus (< 3 cm) and large nidus (≥ 3 cm) groups based on the Spetzler-Martin grading system. Natural history analysis used prospective cohort survival data, while imaging analysis examined angioarchitecture characteristics and quantitative hemodynamic parameters measured with QDSA. The small-nidus group had a significantly higher annualized rupture risk (2.3% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.011). Cross-sectional imaging revealed independent hemorrhagic risk factors, including small nidus (OR, 4.801; 95%CI, 1.280-18.008; p = 0.020) and draining vein stenosis (OR, 6.773; 95%CI, 1.179-38.911; p = 0.032). Hemodynamic analysis identified higher stasis index in the feeding artery (OR, 2.442; 95%CI, 1.074-5.550; p = 0.033), higher stasis index in the draining vein (OR, 11.812; 95%CI, 1.907-73.170; p = 0.008), and lower outflow gradient in the draining vein (OR, 1.658; 95%CI, 1.068-2.574; p = 0.024) as independent predictors of AVM rupture. The small nidus group also showed a higher likelihood of being associated with hemorrhagic risk factors. Small AVM nidus has a higher risk of rupture based on natural history, angioarchitecture, and hemodynamics. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT04572568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruinan Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Pingting Chen
- College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
| | - Heze Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhipeng Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanli Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sattari SA, Shahbandi A, Yang W, Feghali J, Xu R, Huang J. Microsurgery versus Microsurgery With Preoperative Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:27-41. [PMID: 36519858 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative embolization has traditionally been regarded as a safe and effective adjunct to microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM). However, there is currently no high-level evidence to ascertain this presumption. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of microsurgery (MS) vs microsurgery with preoperative embolization (E + MS) in patients with bAVM through systematic review. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was bAVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative bleeding (mL), complications, worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality. The pooled proportions of outcomes were calculated through the logit transformation method. The odds ratio (OR) of categorical data and mean difference of continuous data were estimated through the Mantel-Haenszel and the inverse variance methods, respectively. RESULTS Thirty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight patients were treated by microsurgery alone, and 1088 were treated by microsurgery with preoperative embolization, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in AVM obliteration (94.1% vs 95.6%, OR = 1.15 [0.63-2.11], P = .65), mortality (1.7% vs 2%, OR = 0.88 [0.30-2.58], P = .82), procedural complications (18.2% vs 27.2%, OR = 0.47 [0.19-1.17], P = .10), worsened mRS (21.2% vs 18.5%, OR = 1.08 [0.33-3.54], P = .9), and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = 182.89 [-87.76, 453.55], P = .19). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in AVM obliteration, mortality, complications, worse mRS, and intraoperative blood loss between MS and E + MS groups. For AVMs where MS alone has acceptable results, it is reasonable to bypass unnecessary preoperative embolization given higher postoperative complication risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Aldin Sattari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ataollah Shahbandi
- Tehran School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Wuyang Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - James Feghali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Risheng Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Judy Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|