Wang Q, Rothkopf CA, Triesch J. A model of human motor sequence learning explains facilitation and interference effects based on spike-timing dependent plasticity.
PLoS Comput Biol 2017;
13:e1005632. [PMID:
28767646 PMCID:
PMC5555713 DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005632]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The ability to learn sequential behaviors is a fundamental property of our brains. Yet a long stream of studies including recent experiments investigating motor sequence learning in adult human subjects have produced a number of puzzling and seemingly contradictory results. In particular, when subjects have to learn multiple action sequences, learning is sometimes impaired by proactive and retroactive interference effects. In other situations, however, learning is accelerated as reflected in facilitation and transfer effects. At present it is unclear what the underlying neural mechanism are that give rise to these diverse findings. Here we show that a recently developed recurrent neural network model readily reproduces this diverse set of findings. The self-organizing recurrent neural network (SORN) model is a network of recurrently connected threshold units that combines a simplified form of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) with homeostatic plasticity mechanisms ensuring network stability, namely intrinsic plasticity (IP) and synaptic normalization (SN). When trained on sequence learning tasks modeled after recent experiments we find that it reproduces the full range of interference, facilitation, and transfer effects. We show how these effects are rooted in the network’s changing internal representation of the different sequences across learning and how they depend on an interaction of training schedule and task similarity. Furthermore, since learning in the model is based on fundamental neuronal plasticity mechanisms, the model reveals how these plasticity mechanisms are ultimately responsible for the network’s sequence learning abilities. In particular, we find that all three plasticity mechanisms are essential for the network to learn effective internal models of the different training sequences. This ability to form effective internal models is also the basis for the observed interference and facilitation effects. This suggests that STDP, IP, and SN may be the driving forces behind our ability to learn complex action sequences.
From dialing a phone number to driving home after work, much of human behavior is inherently sequential. But how do we learn such sequential behaviors and what neural plasticity mechanisms support this learning? Recent experiments on sequence learning in human adults have produced a range of confusing findings, especially when subjects have to learn multiple sequences at the same time. For example, the succes of training can strongly depend on subjects’ training schedules, i.e., whether they practice one task until they are proficient before switching to the next or whether they interleave training of the different tasks. Here we show that a model self-organizing neural network readily explains many findings on human sequence learning. The model is formulated as a recurrent network of simplified spiking neurons and incorporates multiple biologically plausible plasticity mechanisms of neurons and synapses. Therefore, it offers a theoretical bridge between basic mechanisms of synaptic and neuronal plasticity and the behavior of human subjects in sequence learning tasks.
Collapse