Primary cCT Imaging Based Clinico-Neurological Assessment-Calling for Addition of Telestroke Video Consultation in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Computed tomography in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging predictors of hematoma expansion and outcome

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10–20% of all strokes worldwide and is associated with serious outcomes, including a 30-day mortality rate of up to 40%. Neuroimaging is pivotal in diagnosing ICH as early detection and determination of underlying cause, and risk for expansion/rebleeding is essential in providing the correct treatment. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the most used modality for detection of ICH, identification of prognostic markers and measurements of hematoma volume, all of which are of major importance to predict outcome. The strongest predictors of 30-day mortality and functional outcome for ICH patients are baseline hematoma volume and hematoma expansion. Even so, exact hematoma measurement is rare in clinical routine practice, primarily due to a lack of tools available for fast, effective, and reliable volumetric tools. In this educational review, we discuss neuroimaging findings for ICH from NCCT images, and their prognostic value, as well as the use of semi-automatic and fully automated hematoma volumetric methods and assessment of hematoma expansion in prognostic studies.

Long-term outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage

OBJECT

The long-term functional outcome of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related hemorrhage (CAAH) patients is unclear. We sought to assess the long-term functional outcome of CAAH and determine the prognostic factors associated with unfavorable outcomes.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive CAAH patients from 2014 to 2020 in this observational study. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with long-term outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 141 CAAH patients, 76 (53.9%) achieved favorable outcomes and 28 (19.9%) of them died at 1-year follow-up. For the longer-term follow-up with a median observation time of 19.0 (interquartile range, 12.0-26.5) months, 71 (50.4%) patients obtained favorable outcomes while 33 (23.4%) died. GCS on admission (OR, 0.109; 95% CI, 0.021-0.556; p = 0.008), recurrence of ICH (OR, 2923.687; 95% CI, 6.282-1360730.14; p = 0.011), WML grade 3-4 (OR, 31.007; 95% CI, 1.041-923.573; p = 0.047), severe central atrophy (OR, 4220.303; 95% CI, 9.135-1949674.84; p = 0.008) assessed by CT was identified as independent predictors for long-term outcome.

INTERPRETATION

Nearly 50% of CAAH patients achieved favorable outcomes at long-term follow-up. GCS, recurrence of ICH, WML grade and cerebral atrophy were identified as independent prognostic factors of long-term outcome.

Interdisciplinary Decision Making in Hemorrhagic Stroke Based on CT Imaging-Differences Between Neurologists and Neurosurgeons Regarding Estimation of Patients' Symptoms, Glasgow Coma Scale, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

Background and Purpose: Acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) requires rapid decision making toward neurosurgery or conservative neurological stroke unit treatment. In a previous study, we found overestimation of clinical symptoms when clinicians rely mainly on cerebral computed tomography (cCT) analysis. The current study investigates differences between neurologists and neurosurgeons estimating specific scores and clinical symptoms.

Methods: Overall, 14 neurologists and 15 neurosurgeons provided clinical estimates and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as well as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) based on cCT images and basic information of 50 patients with hypertensive and lobar ICH. Subgroup analyses were performed for the different professions (neurologists vs. neurosurgeons) and bleeding subtypes (typical location vs. atypical). The differences between the actual GCS and NIHSS scores and the cCT-imaging-based estimated scores were depicted as Bland–Altman plots and negative and positive predictive value (NPV and PPV) for prediction of clinical relevant items. ΔNIHSS points (ΔGCS points) were calculated as the difference between actual and rated NIHSS (GCS) including 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Mean ΔGCS points for neurosurgeons was 1.16 (95% CI: −2.67–4.98); for neurologists, 0.99 (95% CI: −2.58–4.55), p = 0.308; mean ΔNIHSS points for neurosurgeons was −2.95 (95% CI: −12.71–6.82); for neurologists, −0.33 (95% CI: −9.60–8.94), p < 0.001. NPV and PPV for stroke symptoms were low, with large differences between different symptoms, bleeding subtypes, and professions. Both professions had more problems in proper rating of specific clinic–neurological symptoms than rating scores.

Conclusion: Our results stress the need for joint decision making based on detailed neurological examination and neuroimaging findings also in telemedicine.