Effects of Interval Time of the Epley Maneuver on Immediate Reduction of Positional Nystagmus: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-blinded Clinical Trial

Epley's Manoeuvre: A Single Line Treatment for Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is the commonest cause of peripheral vertigo. Displaced free floating otoconia in the semicircular canals are responsible for brief attacks of vertigo and nystagmus. Epley's manoeuvre relocates these particles into the utricle. Here we studied the efficacy of Epley's manoeuvre in posterior semicircular canal BPPV without labyrinthine sedatives. 120 patients presented with positional vertigo were included in the study based on positive Dix- hallpike test from August 2018 to July 2019. These patients were treated with only the Epley's manoeuvre and followed up for 6 months. Patients who were previously on labyrinthine sedatives were advised to stop them and treated with only the Epley's manoeuvre. In our study of 120 patients, mean age was 43.5 yrs. Females (52.5%) were commonly affected. Left side posterior semicircular involvement was more than the right side. Epley's manoeuvre had 90% efficacy at 1st week and 100% efficacy at 4th week. Duration of vertigo had significant association (p < 0.01) with the number of sessions required. There was significant improvement in the duration of vertigo attack (p < 0.0001) and frequency of attack (p < 0.0001) before and after the manoeuvre. Epley's manoeuvre lead to significant (p < 0.001) improvement in the quality of life of affected patients measured by DHI scoring. In our 6 months follow up, 10 recurrences occurred having significant (p < 0.01) association with the duration of vertigo attack. Only Epley's manoeuvre without any labyrinthine sedatives is an effective treatment for posterior semicircular canal BPPV patients. It also improves the quality of life of affected patients.

Simulation Study of BPPV Fatigability

To analyze the mechanism and clinical significance of Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) fatigability and discuss how to eliminate BPPV fatigability. A physical simulation model of BPPV was developed to observe the effect of the Dix-Hallpike test on otolith location and explore strategies to eliminate fatigability. Dix-Hallpike test can keep the otoliths in the lower arm of the posterior semicircular canal away from the ampulla. When the head is tilted 30° forward, the otolith slides to the lower arm near the ampulla, which is sufficient to ensure that the starting position of the otolith is consistent when the Dix-Hallpike test is repeated. When the head is tilted 60° forward, the otolith can enter the ampulla and reach the bottom of the crista ampullaris, which leads to long latency because the otolith sliding in the ampulla does not cause an obvious hydrodynamic effect during the Dix-Hallpike test. The otoliths located on the short arm side of the posterior semicircular canal will break away from the short arm side and enter the utricle when the head is tilted 120° forward. The stable and consistent nystagmus induced by the improved diagnostic test may be a more important feature of BPPV.

Current Therapies in Patients With Posterior Semicircular Canal BPPV, a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of different treatments for posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV) by using direct and indirect evidence from existing randomized data.

METHODS

Randomized case-control studies that compared the efficacy of various nonsurgical treatments in PC-BPPV patients at 1 week and 1 month of follow-up were comprehensively screened. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate direct and indirect treatment comparisons. We further conducted subgroup pairwise meta-analysis to explore the inconsistency between comparisons of the Epley versus a sham maneuver and the Epley versus the Semont maneuver.

RESULTS

A total of 41 parallel, randomized controlled studies were included. The Epley with vestibular rehabilitation (EVR), Epley, Semont and Hybrid maneuvers were effective in eliminating nystagmus during a Dix-Hallpike test at 1 week of follow-up (odds ratios [ORs]: 11.41-23.8, 95% credible interval [CrI]: excluding null), among which EVR showed the best efficacy (the surface area under the cumulative ranking curves [SUCRA] = 77.5%). However, at 1 month of follow-up, only the Semont (rank first, SUCRA = 76.1%) and Epley maneuvers (rank second, SUCRA = 65.3%) were effective in eliminating nystagmus during a Dix-Hallpike test. In the pairwise subgroup meta-analysis, for patients younger than 55 years of age, the efficacy of the Epley maneuver was comparable to that of the Semont maneuver [rate ratio (RR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.05]; for patients with a longer duration before treatment, the effect of the Epley maneuver was equivalent to that of a sham maneuver (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90-1.29).

CONCLUSION

Among the 12 types of PC-BPPV treatments, the Epley, Semont, EVR, and Hybrid maneuvers were effective in eliminating nystagmus during a Dix-Hallpike test for PC-BPPV at 1 week of follow-up, whereas only the Epley and Semont maneuvers were effective at 1 month of follow-up. The duration before treatments and the age of patients might contribute to the efficacy of treatments.

A comparative study of two methods for treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in the emergency department

Introduction

Posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV) is considered the most common cause of peripheral vertigo in the emergency department (ED). Although the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM) is the standard of care, the most effective method to deliver it in the ED has been poorly studied.

Objective

To compare two protocols of the Epley maneuver for the treatment of PC-BPPV.

Patients and methods

We prospectively recruited 101 patients with unilateral PC-BPPV on physical examination, randomizing them to either a single Epley maneuver (EM) (n = 46) or multiple maneuvers (n = 55) on the same visit. Measured outcomes included presence/absence of positional nystagmus, resolution of vertigo, and score on the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) at follow-up evaluations. The DHI was stratified into mild (≤30) and moderate-severe (>30).

Results

Normalization of the Dix-Hallpike maneuver at day 5 was observed in 38% of the single EM group and 44.4% in the multiple EM group (p = 0.62). The DHI showed reduction from 42.2 (SD 18.4) to 31.9 (SD 23.7) in the single EM group and from 43.7 (SD 22.9) to 33.5 (SD 21.5) in the multiple EM group (p = 0.06). A higher number of patients improved from moderate-severe to mild DHI (p = 0.03) in the single EM group compared to the multi-EM group (p = 0.23).

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference between performing a single EM versus multiple EMs for treatment of PC-BPPV in the emergency department. The single EM approach is associated with shorter physical contact between patients and examiner, which is logically safer in a pandemic context.

Effect of Sitting Position vs. Supine Position With the Head Turned to the Affected Side on Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Fatigue

Objective: In benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), positional nystagmus becomes generally weaker when the Dix–Hallpike test is repeated. This phenomenon is termed BPPV fatigue. We previously reported that the effect of BPPV fatigue deteriorates over time (i.e., the positional nystagmus is observed again after maintaining a sitting head position). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the effect of BPPV fatigue attenuates after maintaining a supine position with the head turned to the affected side.

Methods: Twenty patients with posterior-canal-type BPPV were assigned to two groups. Group A received Dix–Hallpike test, were returned to the sitting position (reverse Dix–Hallpike test) with a sitting head position for 10 min, and then received a second Dix–Hallpike test. Group B received Dix–Hallpike test, were kept in the supine position with the head turned to the affected side for 10 min, and then received reverse Dix–Hallpike test followed by the second Dix–Hallpike test. The maximum slow phase eye velocity (MSPEV) of positional nystagmus induced by the first, reverse, and second Dix–Hallpike test were analyzed.

Results: The ratio of MSPEV of the positional nystagmus induced by the second Dix–Hallpike test relative to the first Dix–Hallpike test was significantly smaller in group B than that in group A. There was no difference in the MSPEV of the positional nystagmus induced by the reverse Dix–Hallpike test between group A and B.

Conclusions: The effect of BPPV fatigue is continued by maintaining a supine position with the head turned to the affected side, while the effect is weakened by maintaining a sitting head position. On the basis of the most widely accepted theory of the pathophysiology of BPPV fatigue, in which the particles become dispersed along the canal during head movement in the Dix–Hallpike test, we found an inconsistency whereby the dispersed otoconial debris return to a mass during the sitting position but do not return to a mass in the supine position with the head turned to the affected side. Future studies are required to determine the exact pathophysiology of BPPV fatigue.

Classification of Evidence: 2b.