Outcomes in Symptomatic Patients With Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia Following Endovascular Treatment

Left Anterolateral Medullary Compression Due to Vertebral Artery Dolichoectasia: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Vertebral artery dolichoectasia, characterized by the elongation, dilation, and tortuosity of the vertebral arteries, poses significant clinical challenges due to its potential to compress adjacent neural structures, particularly the medulla oblongata. This case report presents a 73-year-old hypertensive female with recurrent episodes of falls and transient loss of consciousness. Initial assessments including echocardiography and a four-vessel Doppler study were unremarkable, prompting further evaluation with MRI. High-resolution imaging sequences revealed significant dolichoectasia of the left vertebral artery, compressing the left anterolateral medulla. This compression disrupted vital autonomic and motor pathways, explaining the patient's symptoms. Management involved a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating conservative measures, potential endovascular intervention, and neurosurgical consultation. This case underscores the importance of advanced imaging techniques in diagnosing vertebral artery dolichoectasia and highlights the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary treatment strategy to optimize patient outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Profile Braided Stents versus Flow Diverters in the Reconstructive Technique in the Treatment of Patients with Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia Aneurysms: A Cohort of 47 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm is a rare type of cerebrovascular disorder with a poor natural history, and endovascular treatment is widely accepted. Whether a high-profile braided stent (flow diverter) could promote occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm without increasing the complications rather than a low-profile braided stent remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to present a single-center experience of the safety and efficacy of a low-profile braided stent versus a flow diverter in treating patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective review was conducted on a total of 432 consecutive patients diagnosed with posterior circulation aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment in our center from August 2013 to December 2021. Among these patients, 47 individuals with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms who were treated with low-profile braided stents or flow diverters were included. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms involving only the vertebral artery were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the low-profile braided stent group and the flow diverter group based on the device used. Safety and efficacy outcomes were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 25 total patients enrolled in low-profile braided stent group and 22 patients in flow diverter group. The safety of low-profile braided stents and flow diverters in the treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms was evaluated by clinical outcome, a new neurologic deficit due to procedural complications, and neurologic death. The rates of good clinical outcome were similar between the 2 groups (low-profile braided stent, 56%, versus flow diverter, 59.1%; P = .831), and the rates of neurologic death were also similar (low-profile braided stent, 12%, versus flow diverter, 9.1%; P = .747). Higher rates of new neurologic deficits due to procedural complications were observed in the flow diverter group, but the difference was not significant (low-profile braided stent, 24%, versus flow diverter, 40.9%; P = .215). The efficacy was evaluated by angiographic occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms and progression of mass effect resulting from these aneurysms. Significantly higher rates of complete occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms were shown in the flow diverter group (41.2%; P = .028) than in the low-profile braided stent group (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both low-profile braided stents and flow diverters have similar high risks in reconstructive techniques in the treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms, while a flow diverter is more effective in promoting complete occlusion of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysm than a low-profile braided stent. A flow diverter may be a better alternative for carefully selected patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia aneurysms.

Case report: Late in-stent thrombosis in a patient with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia after stent-assisted coil embolization due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is a rare type of cerebrovascular disorder with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Due to the distinct pathological characteristics that fragmented internal elastic lamina and multiple dissections, VBD is difficult to treat and cured. Stent-assisted coil embolization is one of the main treatment modalities for such lesions. However, the duration of healing remained questionable, and there were no effective measures for evaluating endothelial coverage. Before complete endothelial coverage, the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy may lead to fatal in-stent thrombosis; however, continued antiplatelet therapy could also result in bleeding complications. Thus, we present an autopsy case of late in-stent thrombosis due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy and systematically review the literature to provide a reference for endovascular treatment and antiplatelet regimen of VBD.

Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device Flow Diverter Placement for Recurrent Dolichoectatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysm Treated with Multiple Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stents: A Case Study

Objective

We report a case of dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms treated with multiple low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stents followed by flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) flow diverter to prevent the growth of the thrombosed aneurysm.

Case Presentation

A 71-year-old man developed diplopia due to oculomotor nerve palsy after 11 years of follow-up for an enlarging thrombosed dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar artery aneurysm. He initially had a fusiform thrombosed aneurysm from the right vertebral artery to the basilar artery. This lesion was tortuous and strongly compressed the pons. A total of 11 LVISs were deployed from the right posterior cerebral artery to the right vertebral artery. Six months after surgery, there was no enlargement of the thrombosed aneurysm on MRI and the contrast leakage out of the stent was markedly reduced in DSA compared to immediately after surgery. One year and seven months after surgery, contrast leakage out of the stent was increased in DSA. The FRED was placed within the overlapped LVISs, and contrast leakage was somewhat reduced. After 2 years and 7 months from the initial treatment, the contrast leakage was still observed. However, there was no enlargement of the aneurysm and no complications related to treatments were observed.

Conclusion

Treatment with multiple LVIS stents followed by FRED flow diverter treatment for dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms (DVAs) may be one of the treatment options for controlling the growth of thrombotic aneurysms without complications, but the long-term prognosis of this case is unclear, and careful follow-up is mandatory.

Ischemic stroke with extensive vasculopathy in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with multisystem manifestations including vascular abnormalities. The condition is also associated with an increased risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Here we report a case of a 60-year-old male with known neurofibromatosis who presented with right sided hemiparesis. Neuroimaging work-up revealed left internal carotid artery dissection and tandem occlusion of the left internal carotid artery and left middle cerebral artery. There was associated territorial ischemic infarction. The patient was found to have extensive intra and extra cranial vasculopathy including gross basilar dolichoectasia and a right-sided cervical internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. This case highlights the clinical significance of neurofibromatosis associated vasculopathy which can result in stroke.

Prospects and Dilemmas of Endovascular Treatment for Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is characterized by significant expansion, elongation, and tortuosity of the basilar artery and vertebral artery. Certain highly selected cases of VBD can require intervention. Recent advances in endovascular treatment (EVT) have renewed hope for patients with VBD. However, which cases of VBD can benefit from EVT still needs to be determined. Currently, little is known regarding this matter. Therefore, we performed a review of the literature from a PubMed search and cataloged our experience regarding the classification and natural history of VBD and the prospects, prognosis and complications of EVT. The findings can be summarized as follows: for asymptomatic VBD, “wait and see” or medical management may be a reasonable strategy. EVT may only be effective in certain patients. For saccular aneurysms in VBD, especially ruptured aneurysms, EVT is reasonable. For fusiform aneurysms in VBD, EVT can carry high complication rates and should be recommended with caution. For stenting reconstruction in VBD, the effect is uncertain. For the future of EVT of VBD, randomized controlled trials and the development of neurointerventional products are worth pursuing, but EVT in VBD still has a long way to go.

Conservative Therapy vs. Endovascular Approach for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Trunk Large Aneurysms: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk large (≥10 mm) aneurysms (IVBTLAs) are rare and challenging to manage. In this study, we describe the natural prognosis and evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of IVBTLAs compared with conservative therapy.

Methods

This prospective multicenter cohort study included patients with IVBTLAs, who chose either endovascular treatment (endovascular group) or conservative therapy (conservative group) after discussion with their doctors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the target vessel, while secondary endpoints included target vessel-related mortality, major stroke, other serious adverse events, and aneurysm occlusion rate.

Results

In total, 258 patients were referred to our two centers for the management of vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and 69 patients had IVBTLAs. Among them, 51 patients underwent endovascular treatment, and 18 patients received conservative therapy. The incidence of target vessel-related SAEs was 15.7% (8/51) in the endovascular group and 44.4% (8/18) in the conservative group (P = 0.031). The target vessel-related mortality was 2.0% (1/51) in the endovascular group and 38.9% (7/18) in the conservative group (P < 0.001). The cumulative survival rates in the endovascular group and conservative group within 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 98.0% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.020; 98.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.001; and 98.0% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset as risks factor for SAEs.

Conclusions

Compared with conservative treatment, endovascular treatment of the IVBTLAs may be associated with a lower incidence of SAEs, with higher 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates. Conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset were associated with a high risk of SAEs.

[Diagnosis and treatment of non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms]

OBJECTIVE

To systematize the data on diagnosis and treatment of non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have analyzed modern and fundamental studies in the PubMed database for the period 1969-2020. The following keywords were used: non-saccular aneurysm, dolichoectasia, vertebrobasilar pool. Fifty-nine studies including 1 meta-analysis, 9 case reports, 24 reviews and 25 original articles were selected.

RESULTS

Analysis of literature data indicates various unresolved problems associated with difficult diagnosis and choice of treatment that results high rates of disability and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Data on anatomical features of non-saccular aneurysms, such as presence or absence of perforating arteries within the affected arterial segment, analysis of electrophysiological changes following brainstem compression by aneurysm can serve as factors that will improve treatment outcomes in these patients.

Posterior Circulation Ischemia in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To perform literature review of clinical, radiographic, and anatomical features of posterior circulation ischemia (PCI) and systematic review of the literature on the management of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and associated outcomes.

METHODS

Review of literature was conducted to identify publications describing the risk factors, etiology, clinical presentation, and imaging for PCI. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from 2009 to 2020 for articles relating to management of BAO. A synthesis was compiled summarizing current evidence on management of BAO.

RESULTS

PCI accounts for 15%-20% of strokes. Risk factors are similar to anterior circulation strokes. Dizziness (47%), unilateral limb weakness (41%), and dysarthria (31%) are the most common presenting symptoms. A noncontrast head CT will identify PCI in 21% of cases; diffusion-weighted MRI or CT perfusion increase sensitivity to 85%. Recent trials have shown endovascular therapy can achieve >80% recanalization of BAO. In select patients, 30%-60% who receive endovascular treatment can achieve favorable outcome vs without. A total of 13% achieve good outcome and there is an 86% mortality rate.

DISCUSSION

PCI can present with waxing and waning symptoms or clinical findings that overlap with stroke mimics and anterior circulation ischemia, making diagnosis more heavily dependent on imaging. Recanalization is an important predictor of improved functional outcome and survival. In this endovascular era, trials of BAO are fraught with deterrents to enrollment. Despite limitations, endovascular treatment has shown improved outcome in select patients.

Absence of pontine perforators in vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia on ultra-high resolution cone-beam computed tomography

Background

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBDE) is a rare type of non-saccular intracranial aneurysm, with poor natural history and limited effective treatment options. Visualizing neurovascular microanatomy in patients with VBDE has not been previously reported, but may yield insight into the pathology, and provide important information for treatment planning.

Objective

To carry out a retrospective analysis of ultra-high resolution cone-beam computed tomography (UHR-CBCT) in patients with fusiform basilar aneurysms, visualizing neurovascular microanatomy of the posterior circulation with a special focus on the pontine perforators.

Methods

UHR-CBCT was performed in seven patients (mean age 59 years; two female) with a VBDE, and in 14 control patients with unrelated conditions.

Results

The mean maximum diameter of the fusiform vessel segment was 28 mm (range 19–36 mm), and the mean length of the segment was 39 mm (range 15–50 mm). In all patients with VBDE, UHR-CBCT demonstrated an absence of perforating arteries in the fusiform arterial segment and a mean of 3.7 perforators arising from the unaffected vessel segment. The network of interconnected superficial circumferential pontine arteries (brainstem vasocorona) were draping around the aneurysm sac. In controls, a mean of 3.6, 2.5, and 1.2 perforators were demonstrated arising from the distal, mid-, and proximal basilar artery, respectively.

Conclusions

The absence of pontine perforators in the fusiform vessel segment of VBDE is counterbalanced by recruitment of collateral flow from pontine perforators arising from the unaffected segment of the basilar artery, as well as collaterals arising from the anterior inferior cerebellar artery/posterior inferior cerebellar artery and superior cerebellar artery. These alternative routes supply the superficial brainstem arteries (brainstem vasocorona) and sustain brainstem viability. Our findings might have implications for further treatment planning.

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Non-saccular Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms: Pipeline Embolization Devices Versus Conventional Stents

Background

Endovascular treatment of large or giant non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms (VBAs) by conventional stents is difficult and has unsatisfactory outcomes.

Object

This study was performed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of a flow diverter in treating large and giant non-saccular VBAs.

Methods

We identified 78 patients with 83 large or giant non-saccular VBAs who accepted endovascular treatment with a pipeline embolization device (PED) or conventional stent from January 2014 to June 2018. The technical details of the procedure, procedure-associated complications, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Forty-two patients (53.8%, 42/78) with 44 aneurysms (53.0%, 44/83) underwent endovascular treatment with PEDs. Thirty-six patients (46.2%, 36/78) with 39 aneurysms (47.0%, 39/83) underwent endovascular treatment with conventional stents. The complication rate of PED group and conventional stent group was 7.1% (3/42) and 5.6% (2/36), respectively (odds ratio, 0.765; 95% confidence interval, 0.121–4.851; P = 0.776). During a median follow-up time of 28.8 months, the complete occlusion rate in the PED group and conventional stent group was 90.2% (37/41) and 70.3% (26/37), respectively (odds ratio, 3.913; 95% confidence interval, 1.122–13.652; P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Endovascular treatment with a PED is a promising and safe modality for large and giant non-saccular VBAs, and the complication rate is acceptable, compared with conventional endovascular treatment.