Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Ostial Vertebral Artery Stenosis: A Single Center Experience

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiation stenosis of the vertebral artery

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in patients with medically refractory post-irradiation stenosis of the vertebral artery (PISVA) have not been clarified.

AIM

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and outcomes of PTAS in patients with severe PISVA compared with their radiation-naïve counterparts (non-RT group).

METHODS

Patients with medically refractory severe symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis and undergoing PTAS between 2000 and 2021 were classified as the PISVA group or the non-RT group. The periprocedural neurological complications, periprocedural brain magnetic resonance imaging, the extent of symptom relief, and long-term stent patency were compared.

RESULTS

As compared with the non-RT group (22 cases, 24 lesions), the PISVA group (10 cases, 10 lesions) was younger (62.0 ± 8.6 vs 72.4 ± 9.7 years, P = 0.006) and less frequently had hypertension (40.0% vs 86.4%, P = 0.013) and diabetes mellitus (10.0% vs 54.6%, P = 0.024). Periprocedural embolic infarction was not significantly different between the non-RT group and the PISVA group (37.5% vs 35.7%, P = 1.000). At a mean follow-up of 72.1 ± 58.7 (3-244) months, there was no significant between-group differences in the symptom recurrence rate (0.00% vs 4.55%, P = 1.000) and in-stent restenosis rate (10.0% vs 12.5%, P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

PTAS of severe medically refractory PISVA is effective in the management of vertebrobasilar ischemic symptoms in head and neck cancer patients. Technical safety and outcome of the procedure were like those features in radiation-naïve patients.

Risk factors for in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery stenting of V1 segment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge in the treatment of vertebral artery V1 segment stenosis. The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the risk factors of ISR.

METHODS

Studies eligible for inclusion criteria were found in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Data related to risk factors of ISR were extracted from the included studies, and pooled analysis was performed when data of the same factor were available in ≥2 studies. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed with odds ratios (OR) and continuous outcomes were analyzed with a weighted mean difference (WMD). The Stata 14.0 program was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies involving 1356 patients were included in our analysis. Pooled analyses showed that younger age (p = 0.01; WMD= -1.958; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.453 to -0.463) and V1 tortuosity (p = 0.004; OR = 4.145; 95% CI, 1.56-11.012) significantly associated with higher risk of ISR in V1 segment stenting. While bare-metal stents, stent diameter and length, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and smoking were not found to increase ISR rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that young age and V1 tortuosity increase the ISR rates after vertebral V1 segment stenting.

Drug-coated Balloons in the Neurovascular Setting: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of Current Use and Indications

Background

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are an established tool in the prevention and treatment of coronary and peripheral artery restenosis. The underlying effects of restenosis resemble those in the neurovascular field, yet data on the use of DCB in cervical and intracranial arteries is rare.

Methods

Medline, and international and major national guidelines and recommendations were systematically searched for data addressing the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting.

Results

Of the 1448 relevant records found in Medline, 166 publications were considered for this review.

Conclusions

Data on the use of DCB in the neurovascular setting show a possible benefit over preceding alternatives, such as self-expanding stents, and balloon-mounted or drug-eluting stents. Nonetheless, the role of DCB remains under-researched, and publications remain lacking.

The Effects of Rapamycin on the Proliferation, Migration, and Apoptosis of Human Tracheal Fibroblasts (HTrF) and Human Tracheal Epithelial Cells (HTEpiC)

Background: Restenosis after airway stenting needs to be addressed urgently. Rapamycin has been proven to inhibit restenosis elsewhere. This study aimed at observing its effects on the respiratory tract. Methods: CCK-8, wound healing, Transwell and apoptosis assays were performed to detect the effects of rapamycin on the survival, migration, and apoptosis, respectively, of human tracheal fibroblasts (HTrF) and human tracheal epithelial cells (HTEpiC). Results: The effective concentrations of paclitaxel, mitomycin C and rapamycin on HTrF were 10⁻⁷–10⁻⁴ mol/L, 10⁻⁶–10⁻⁴ mol/L, and 10⁻⁵–10⁻⁴ mol/L, respectively. At the effective concentrations, the inhibition rates of paclitaxel on HTEpiC were (43.03 ± 1.12)%, (49.49 ± 0.86)%, (55.22 ± 1.43)%, and (93.19 ± 0.45)%; the inhibition rates of mitomycin C on HTEpiC were (88.11 ± 0.69)%, (93.82 ± 0.96)%, and (94.94 ± 0.54)%; the inhibition rates of rapamycin on HTEpiC were (10.19 ± 0.35)% and (94.55 ± 0.71)%. At the concentration of (1–4) × 10⁻⁵ mol/L, the inhibition rate of rapamycin on HTrF was more than 50%, and that on HTEpiC was less than 20% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to paclitaxel and mitomycin C, rapamycin had the least effect on HTEpiC while effectively inhibiting HTrF. The optimum concentration range was (1–4) × 10⁻⁵ mol/L.

Safety and Efficacy of Rapamycin-Eluting Vertebral Stents in Patients With Symptomatic Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis

Background and Purpose: Drug-eluting stents generally have superior performance to bare metal stents in the treatment of vertebral artery stenosis (VAS). This prospective, multicenter, and single-arm clinical trial was initiated to assess in-stent restenosis (ISR) and midterm outcome after rapamycin-eluting stent placement in patients with symptomatic extracranial VAS.

Methods: The subjects underwent angiographic follow-up at 6 months and final clinical follow-up at 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was ISR at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, target lesion-related transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, or death, and all-cause TIA, stroke, or death during the 12-month follow-up period.

Results: A total of 104 stents were implanted in the 101 patients and 83 patients (82.2%) completed angiographic follow-up at 6 months. The technical success rate was 86.1% (87/101); mean in-stent stenosis rate was 25.1 ± 17.1% and ISR rate was 5.9% (95% CI: 0.8–10.9%). All the patients with ISR were completely asymptomatic and no stent fractures were observed during angiographic follow-up. At the 12-month clinical follow-up, target lesion-related TIA, stroke, or death had occurred in two (2.0%) patients and all-cause TIA, stroke, or death had occurred in six (6.1%) patients.

Conclusion: The placement of rapamycin-eluting stents in patients with symptomatic extracranial VAS yields favorable ISR results and showed a trend of favorable safety outcomes including low rates of perioperative complications and late stroke. However, further study is needed to establish the long-term clinical benefits of this stent in the treatment of VA disease.

Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.

RESULTS

Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.

CONCLUSION

There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.