Editorial: Preventing Developmental Brain Injury-From Animal Models to Clinical Trials

Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Cell Therapy for Perinatal Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION

We have previously described preclinical literature which supports umbilical cord blood-derived cell (UCBC) therapy as an efficacious treatment for perinatal brain injury. However, efficacy of UCBCs may be influenced by different patient population and intervention characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effects of UCBCs on brain outcomes in animal models of perinatal brain injury across subgroups to better understand the contribution of model type (preterm versus term), brain injury type, UCB cell type, route of administration, timing of intervention, cell dosage, and number of doses.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed to identify studies using UCBC therapy in animal models of perinatal brain injury. Subgroup differences were measured by chi2 test where possible.

RESULTS

Differential benefits of UCBCs were seen across a number of subgroup analyses including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) vs. hypoxia ischemia (HI) model (apoptosis white matter (WM): chi2 = 4.07; P = .04, neuroinflammation-TNF-α: chi2 = 5.99; P = .01), UCB-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) vs. UCB-derived mononuclear cells (MNCs) (oligodendrocyte WM: chi2 = 5.01; P = .03, neuroinflammation-TNF-α: chi2 = 3.93; P = .05, apoptosis grey matter (GM), astrogliosis WM), and intraventricular/intrathecal vs. systemic routes of administration (microglial activation GM: chi2 = 7.51; P = .02, astrogliosis WM: chi2 = 12.44; P = .002). We identified a serious risk of bias and overall low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Preclinical evidence suggests UCBCs to show greater efficacy in the injury model of IVH compared to HI, the use of UCB-MSCs compared to UCB-MNCs and the use of local administrative routes compared to systemic routes in animal models of perinatal brain injury. Further research is needed to improve certainty of evidence and address knowledge gaps.

Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Cell Therapy for Perinatal Brain Injury: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies

Perinatal brain injury is a major contributor to long-term adverse neurodevelopment. There is mounting preclinical evidence for use of umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived cell therapy as potential treatment. To systematically review and analyse effects of UCB-derived cell therapy on brain outcomes in preclinical models of perinatal brain injury. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. Brain injury outcomes were extracted for meta-analysis to calculate standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using an inverse variance, random effects model. Outcomes were separated based on grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) regions where applicable. Risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE, and GRADE was used to summarise certainty of evidence. Fifty-five eligible studies were included (7 large, 48 small animal models). UCB-derived cell therapy significantly improved outcomes across multiple domains, including decreased infarct size (SMD 0.53; 95% CI (0.32, 0.74), p < 0.00001), apoptosis (WM, SMD 1.59; 95%CI (0.86, 2.32), p < 0.0001), astrogliosis (GM, SMD 0.56; 95% CI (0.12, 1.01), p = 0.01), microglial activation (WM, SMD 1.03; 95% CI (0.40, 1.66), p = 0.001), neuroinflammation (TNF-α, SMD 0.84; 95%CI (0.44, 1.25), p < 0.0001); as well as improved neuron number (SMD 0.86; 95% CI (0.39, 1.33), p = 0.0003), oligodendrocyte number (GM, SMD 3.35; 95 %CI (1.00, 5.69), p = 0.005) and motor function (cylinder test, SMD 0.49; 95 %CI (0.23, 0.76), p = 0.0003). Risk of bias was determined as serious, and overall certainty of evidence was low. UCB-derived cell therapy is an efficacious treatment in pre-clinical models of perinatal brain injury, however findings are limited by low certainty of evidence.

Brain damage caused by neonatal hypoxia-ischemia and the effects of hypothermia in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a major cause of brain damage in newborns. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be neuroprotective against neonatal HIE in clinical trials, its effect is not satisfactory. Cell-based therapies have attracted much attention as novel treatments for HIE. Preclinical studies on a variety of human cell transplantation methods have been performed in immunodeficient/immunosuppressed animals, such as severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, which lack functional T and B lymphocytes. The detailed characteristics of neonatal HIE in SCID mice, however, have not been delineated. In preclinical studies, novel therapies for neonatal HIE should be evaluated in combination with hypothermia, which has become a standard treatment for neonatal HIE. However, the effects of hypothermia in SCID mice have not been delineated. In the present study, we compared neonatal hypoxic-ischemic (HI) brain damage in SCID mice and wild-type mice treated with or without hypothermia. Male and female mouse pups were subjected to HI insult induced by unilateral common carotid artery ligation combined with systemic hypoxia on postnatal day 12. In the first 4 h after HI insult, body temperature was maintained at 36 °C for the normothermia groups or 32 °C for the hypothermia groups. The severity of brain damage in SCID mice did not differ from that in wild-type mice based on most evaluations, i.e., cerebral blood flow, hemiparesis, muscle strength, spontaneous activity, cerebral hemispheric volume, neuropathological injury, and serum cytokine levels, although spleen weight, brain weight, leukocyte counts and the levels of some cytokines in the peripheral blood were different between genotypes. The effects of hypothermia in SCID mice were comparable to those in wild-type mice based on most evaluations. Taken together, these findings indicate that SCID mice can be used as an appropriate preclinical model for cell therapies for neonatal HIE.

Autologous cord blood cell therapy for neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a pilot study for feasibility and safety

Neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a serious condition; many survivors develop neurological impairments, including cerebral palsy and intellectual disability. Preclinical studies show that the systemic administration of umbilical cord blood cells (UCBCs) is beneficial for neonatal HIE. We conducted a single-arm clinical study to examine the feasibility and safety of intravenous infusion of autologous UCBCs for newborns with HIE. When a neonate was born with severe asphyxia, the UCB was collected, volume-reduced, and divided into three doses. The processed UCB was infused at 12–24, 36–48, and 60–72 hours after the birth. The designed enrolment was six newborns. All six newborns received UCBC therapy strictly adhering to the study protocol together with therapeutic hypothermia. The physiological parameters and peripheral blood parameters did not change much between pre- and postinfusion. There were no serious adverse events that might be related to cell therapy. At 30 days of age, the six infants survived without circulatory or respiratory support. At 18 months of age, neurofunctional development was normal without any impairment in four infants and delayed with cerebral palsy in two infants. This pilot study shows that autologous UCBC therapy is feasible and safe.