Patency of Branch Vessels After Pipeline Embolization: Comparison of Various Branches

Thromboembolic Events in the Posterior Circulation After Flow Diversion-A Closer Look at Coverage of the Posterior Cerebral Artery

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion for bifurcation aneurysms requires excluding one of the branches from the parent artery, raising concern for ischemic events. We evaluated thromboembolic events and their relationship with covering the origin of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with confirmed basilar and proximal PCA aneurysms treated with flow diversion between 2013 and 2023. Procedures were classified according to the coverage of the origin of the PCA. Thromboembolic events associated with the excluded PCA were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the total 28 aneurysms included, 7 were at the basilar tip, 16 in the basilar trunk, and 5 in the first segment of the PCA; 15 were treated by excluding one of the PCAs. Dual antiplatelet therapy included aspirin and ticagrelor (57.1%), aspirin and clopidogrel (35.7%), or aspirin and prasugrel (3.57%). Complete and near-complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 80.8% of the aneurysms treated at a median follow-up of 12.31 months. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 3 patients (2 with basilar perforator stroke and 1 with basilar in-stent thrombosis). However, the difference in these events was not statistically significant between patients with PCA coverage and those without (P = 0.46). Diminished flow and a lack of flow was seen in 8 and 7 of the covered vessels, respectively. A modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 was reported for 89.3% of patients at a median clinical follow-up of 5.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of thromboembolic events is high in distal basilar and proximal PCA aneurysms; however, PCA coverage was not associated with their occurrence. There was no difference in postprocedural disability between patients whose aneurysms were treated by excluding one of the PCAs and those who were not.

Predictors of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with flow diverters: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Flow diverters (FDs) have become an integral part of treatment for brain aneurysms.

AIM

To summarize available evidence of factors associated with aneurysm occlusion (AO) after treatment with a FD.

METHODS

References were identified using the Nested Knowledge AutoLit semi-automated review platform between January 1, 2008 and August 26, 2022. The review focuses on preprocedural and postprocedural factors associated with AO identified in logistic regression analysis. Studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria of study details (ie, study design, sample size, location, (pre)treatment aneurysm details). Evidence levels were classified by variability and significancy across studies (eg, low variability ≥5 studies and significance in ≥60% throughout reports).

RESULTS

Overall, 2.03% (95% CI 1.22 to 2.82; 24/1184) of screened studies met the inclusion criteria for predictors of AO based on logistic regression analysis. Predictors of AO with low variability in multivariable logistic regression analysis included aneurysm characteristics (aneurysm diameter), particularly complexity (absence of branch involvement) and younger patient age. Predictors of moderate evidence for AO included aneurysm characteristics (neck width), patient characteristics (absence of hypertension), procedural (adjunctive coiling) and post-deployment variables (longer follow-up; direct postprocedural satisfactory occlusion). Variables with a high variability in predicting AO following FD treatment were gender, FD as re-treatment strategy, and aneurysm morphology (eg, fusiform or blister).

CONCLUSION

Evidence of predictors for AO after FD treatment is sparse. Current literature suggests that absence of branch involvement, younger age, and aneurysm diameter have the highest impact on AO following FD treatment. Large studies investigating high-quality data with well-defined inclusion criteria are needed for greater insight into FD effectiveness.

Effect of the pipeline embolization device placement on branching vessels in anterior circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pipeline embolization device (PED) is widely used in intracranial aneurysms, and the scope of applications for the PED, which is frequently used to treat cerebral aneurysms, is also growing. It has some effect on branching vessels as a result of its inherent properties. The effects of PED on the complications rate and branching vessels blockage have not yet been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review searching reports from multiple databases on PED use for intracranial aneurysms, and analyzed the influence of PED on the occlusion rate of different branching vessels, and the influence of the amount of PED on the occlusion rate of branching vessels by meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the literature using PUBMED, Web of Science, and OVID databases until August 2023. Inclusion criteria were that the study used only PED, included at least 10 patients, and recorded branching vessels occlusion rates, mortality, and neurological complications.

RESULTS

Nine studies were analyzed consisting of 706 patients with 986 side branches. The results of the meta-analysis showed that application of more than one PED did not significantly elevate the rate of branching vessels occlusion compared to application of one PED (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.43; P = 0.33). In the comparison of branching vessels occlusion rates in the anterior circulation, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) had a significantly higher occlusion rate compared to the ophthalmic artery (OphA) (OR = 6.54; 95% CI: 3.05 to 14.01; P < 0.01), ACA also had a higher occlusion rate compared to the anterior choroidal artery (AchA) (OR = 15.44; 95% CI: 4.11 to 57.94 P < 0.01), ACA versus posterior communicating artery (PcomA) occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 0.63 to 12.82; P = 0.17), OphA versus AchA occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.56; 95% CI: 0.89 to 7.38; P = 0.08), and the occlusion rate was significantly higher for PcomA compared to AchA (OR = 7.22; 95% CI: 2.49 to 20.95; P < 0.01) and lower for OphA compared to PcomA (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.55; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis shows that use of multiple PEDs did not significantly increase the occlusion rate of branching vessels, and the larger the diameter of branching vessels covered by PED, the higher the occlusion rate of branching vessels. However, the incidence of complications is low after branching vessels occlusion in anterior circulation, which is related to the collateral circulation compensation of the branching vessels.

Flow-diverter stents in intracranial aneurysm treatment: impact on covered cerebral artery branches

OBJECTIVE

Flow diverter stents (FDSs) have attracted interest for intracranial aneurysm (IA) treatment; however, occlusion of side branches and related complications have been reported. This study aimed to investigate the effects of FDSs in IA management when different branches of intracranial arteries are covered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to include randomized or nonrandomized comparative-designed studies from January 2000 to August 2022 which reported outcomes of occlusion/narrowing of branches after IA treatment using FDSs. The PRISMA guidelines were used for our report. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool the outcomes, which included incidence rates of occlusion/narrowing of FDS-covered branches, branch occlusion-related symptoms, obliteration of IAs, and ideal clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2).

RESULTS

The authors identified 57 studies involving 3789 patients with IA managed by FDSs covering different branches. During the median imaging follow-up at 12 months, the IA obliteration rate was satisfactory (>70%) when covering the ophthalmic artery (OA), posterior communicating artery (PComA), anterior choroidal artery (AChoA) or anterior cerebral artery (ACA), but not the middle cerebral artery-M2 segment (MCA-M2; 69.5%; 95% CI: 60.8-77.5%) and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA; 59.1%, 13/22). The overall ideal clinical outcome was observed in 97.4% of patients (95% CI: 95.5-98.9%). Higher rates of occlusion/narrowing of branches were identified when FDSs covered the ACA (66.6%; 95% CI: 45.1-85.3%), PComA (44.3%; 95% CI: 34.2-54.6%), or MCA-M2 (39.2%; 95% CI: 24.5-54.7%); the risks were lower when covering the OA (11.8%; 95% CI: 8.8-15.1%), PICA (6.8%; 95% CI: 1.5-14.5%), and AchoA (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.0-2.9%). The risk of branch occlusion-related complications was low (incidence rate <5%) for each of the six evaluated branches.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable outcomes were identified following treatment of IAs when FDSs were placed across each of the six studied cerebral arteries. Treatment decisions regarding FDS placement across branch arteries should be made with the risk of complications from branch occlusion in mind.

Paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm with delayed stent occlusion after deployment of a flow diverter stent involving the orifice of the anterior cerebral artery: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

In-stent thrombotic occlusion is a serious ischemic complication that can also result in ischemia in the distal perfusion territory and the territory of side branches for the artery in which the flow diverter (FD) stent is deployed.

OBSERVATIONS

A 49-year-old female with a large paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm was treated with an FD involving the orifice of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA). The antiplatelet dose was reduced because of an increased clopidogrel response postintervention. The patient developed aphasia 2 months later. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography of the brain indicated FD stent occlusion and a small infarct in the distal vascular territory of the ipsilateral ICA, but the anterior choroidal artery (AChoA) territory was preserved by collateral flow. Emergency superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery anastomosis was performed, and she was discharged without neurological deficit 2 weeks after the second operation.

LESSONS

In-stent occlusion after FD deployment involving the orifice of the ACA can cause severe cerebral ischemia that requires an adequate antiplatelet effect and careful follow-up. The AChoA territory can be preserved by collateral blood flow even in cases of in-stent occlusion.

Results of Double Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Blue Stenting for the Treatment of Fusiform Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The flow diversion technique is increasingly used for reconstructive endovascular treatment of fusiform cerebral aneurysms. Double stenting with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) Blue stent is one of the flow diversion techniques. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of LVIS Blue double stenting for fusiform cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

Between March 2016 and July 2020, double LVIS Blue stenting was attempted in 25 fusiform cerebral aneurysms. Patient medical records and radiological images were carefully reviewed.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100% (25/25). Six aneurysms (24.0%) were located in the anterior circulation and 19 aneurysms (76.0%) were located in the posterior circulation. Intraprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred in 1 patient (4.0%). During the follow-up period (30.8 ± 14.2 months), there were no deaths or delayed complications. The mean angiographic follow-up duration was 28.2 ± 12.8 months. Follow-up angiography revealed complete obliteration (O'Kelly-Marotta D) in 21 (84.0%) patients and near-complete obliteration (O'Kelly-Marotta C + 2 matched with Kamran-Byrne grade 3) in 2 (8.0%) patients. Two patients (8.0%) showed worsening of obliteration grades. One (4.0%) patient required retreatment. There was no significant in-stent stenosis or branch occlusion covered by stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Double stenting using LVIS Blue stents for the treatment of fusiform cerebral aneurysms is effective and safe.

Flared non-flow diverting ends of the FRED flow diverter for cerebral aneurysms facilitate device anchoring at the arterial bifurcation

INTRODUCTION

The Flow Redirection Intraluminal Device (FRED) flow diverter has a unique bilayer design, with the outer scaffolding stent extending beyond the inner flow diverting component by about 3 mm at each end. Here, we describe a technique to utilize these unrestrained flared ends for precise flow diverter placement in cases where the aneurysm and an adjacent branch are in close proximity and branch jailing is not desired, such as in posterior communicating artery aneurysms.Technical note: The distal end of the FRED device is pushed out of the microcatheter at the carotid terminus. Once the distal flared ends are fully open and well situated in the terminus, ideally with at least one of the limbs in the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery, the device is unsheathed under gentle forward pressure. This technique stabilizes the device at the distal landing zone and prevents unintended foreshortening at the distal end. This is particularly important for aneurysms located adjacent to the carotid terminus in order to assure adequate neck coverage, as well as avoiding jailing one of the branching parent arteries. An illustrative case is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-flow diverting unrestrained flared ends of the FRED stabilize the distal end of the device when deployed directly into the branches at the arterial bifurcation. The technique is useful to provide adequate neck coverage of cerebral aneurysm located directly adjacent to the bifurcation as is frequently the case with posterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Delayed Occlusion of the Anterior Choroidal Artery Following Flow Diverter Stent Deployment for Unruptured Aneurysm: A Case Report and Literature Review

Flow diverter stent has been a promising device for intracranial aneurysm treatment. For treating aneurysms located in the anterior circulation, critical branches may be covered by flow diverter stent. The occlusion incidence of these branches has been reported, and even if branch vessel occlusions occur, associated neurological deficits are extremely rare. We present a 55-year-old woman who had a large saccular aneurysm at the right internal carotid artery (ICA). A developed fetal-type posterior communicating artery (PCOM) originated from the sac. We administered flow diverter stent deployment with coil insertion following surgical anastomosis of the superficial temporal artery to the posterior cerebral artery (STA-PCA) with ligation of the origin of the PCOM. On the seventh morning following the intervention, ischemic complication developed due to anterior choroidal artery occlusion jailed by the flow diverter stent. The occlusion of anterior choroidal artery covered by flow diverter stent is extremely rare. However, if the branch arises from the aneurysm sac, occlusion can transpire and induce serious complication. The most probable cause of occlusion in this case was that the orifice was jailed apart from the stent strut because the branch originated from the sac rather than the neck. Furthermore, the progression rate of intra-aneurysm thrombus formation is also an important factor affecting the side branch occlusion.

Branch vessel occlusion in aneurysm treatment with flow diverter stent

Flow diverter placement for treatment of intracranial aneurysms gained growing consensus in the past years. A major concern among professionals is the side branch coverage which leads in some cases to vessel occlusion. However, the lost vessel patency only infrequently is accompanied by a new onset of neurological deficits secondary to ischaemic lesions. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with flow diversion at our hospital was aimed to better understand this phenomenon in order to formulate a hypothesis about the causes. We concluded that vessel occlusion occurs due to a reduced blood pressure gradient in those vessels with a strong collateral or anastomotic vascularization that refurnishes the same distal vascular territories. Indeed, we detected no new brain infarction since blood flow was always guaranteed.

Application of flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms in the internal carotid artery bifurcation region

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of aneurysms in the internal carotid bifurcation region (ICABR), including aneurysms of the true internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, those inclined on the proximal A1 or M1 segments or at the most distal pre-bifurcation (ICA) segment, is often challenging in microsurgical clipping and endovascular surgery. Few reports had discussed flow diversion as a therapeutic option for this group.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study analysing flow diversion in treating ICABR aneurysms. Seven patients harbouring eight aneurysms in the ICABR were treated with flow diversion. Five aneurysms were inclined on the proximal A1 segment, and three were located at the most distal pre-bifurcation segment. Patients' demographics, presentation, procedure technical description, angiographic and clinical follow-up were recorded. PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were also reviewed for articles published in English, including case series or case reports, for ICABR aneurysms treated with flow diverters.

RESULTS

All patients except one underwent angiographic follow-up. The Karman-Byrne occlusion scale was used to determine the occlusion rate. All six patients with documented angiographic follow-up had a class IV occlusion score. No permanent or transient neurological or non-neurological complications were encountered in this study.

CONCLUSION

Treating ICABR aneurysms using flow diversion is feasible, with a promising angiographic occlusion rate. Further studies are needed to analyse long-term clinical and angiographic results.