Type of Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Passive or active drainage system for chronic subdural haematoma-a single-center retrospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative drainage systems have become a standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). We previously compared treatment results from three Scandinavian centers using three different postoperative drainage systems and concluded that the active subgaleal drainage was associated with lower recurrence and complication rates than the passive subdural drainage. We consequently changed clinical practice from using the passive subdural drainage to the active subgaleal drainage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess a potential change in reoperation rates for CSDH after conversion to the active subgaleal drainage.

METHODS

This single-center cohort study compared the reoperation rates for recurrent same-sided CSDH and postoperative complication rates between patients treated during two study periods (passive subdural drainage cohort versus active subgaleal drainage cohort).

RESULTS

In total, 594 patients were included in the study. We found no significant difference in reoperation rates between the passive subdural drain group and the active subgaleal drain group (21.6%, 95% CI 17.5-26.4% vs. 18.0%, 95% CI 13.8-23.2%; p = 0.275). There was no statistical difference in the rate of serious complications between the groups. The operating time was significantly shorter for patients operated with the active subgaleal drain than patients with the passive subdural drain (32.8 min, 95% CI 31.2-34.5 min vs. 47.6 min, 95% CI 44.7-50.4 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from the passive subdural to the active subgaleal drainage did not result in a clear reduction of reoperation rates for CSDH in our center.

Risk factors for recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after surgical evacuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition. Surgical evacuation has remained the primary treatment despite many advancements in the endovascular field. Regardless, recurrence requiring reoperation is commonly observed during the postoperative follow-up. Herein, we aimed to investigate risk factors for recurrence after surgical evacuation. A review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted using the designed search string. Studies were reviewed based on the predefined eligibility criteria. Data regarding sixty potential risk factors along with operational information were extracted for analysis. A meta-analysis using the random-effect model was conducted, and each risk factor affecting the postoperative recurrence of CSDH was then evaluated and graded. A total of 198 records met the eligibility criteria. A total number of 8523 patients with recurrent CSDH and 56,096 with non-recurrent CSDH were included in the study. The recurrence rate after surgical evacuation was 12%. Fifteen preoperative, nine radiologic, four hematoma-related, and three operative and postoperative factors were associated with recurrence. Risk factors associated with recurrence after surgical evacuation are important in neurosurgical decision-making and treatment planning. Found risk factors in this study may be used as the basis for pre-operative risk assessment to choose patients who would benefit the most from surgical evacuation.

A Case Series of DuraMatrix-Onlay® Plus in Cranial Surgery Is Associated With a Low Complication Profile

BACKGROUND

DuraMatrix-Onlay® Plus is a collagen dura membrane derived from purified bovine Achilles tendon. The matrix provides a scaffold for collagen synthesis and is intended to be used as an onlay without the need for dural sutures. The study aims to describe our experience with 33 consecutive patients who underwent a duraplasty procedure using the novel DuraMatrix-Onlay® Plus collagen dura membrane.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of 33 patients who underwent a duraplasty procedure at a single academic hospital in Los Angeles, CA, USA between May 2016 and March 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Secondary outcomes included rates of patient infection, dural substitute complication, and removal.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent a duraplasty procedure using the DuraMatrix-Onlay® Plus material. The average age of the patients was 41.12±7.34 years (range 2-75 years). There were 18 (54.5%) females and 15 (45.5%) males. The majority of procedures were elective operations for the resection of a lesion (n=19, 58%), and the average graft size was 17.69±4.73 cm². At an average follow-up of 3 months, there were no postoperative CSF leaks. The rates of patient infection, dural substitute complication, and removal were 6%, 6%, and 3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DuraMatrix-Onlay® Plus is associated with a low rate of postoperative CSF leakage and an acceptable complication profile. This result supports the use of collagen matrices for dural closure in general neurosurgical procedures.

Subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage vs. subdural drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly treated via surgical removal of the hematoma, placement of a routine indwelling drainage tube, and continuous drainage to ensure that the blood does not re-aggregate following removal. However, the optimal location for placement of the drainage tube remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To aid in establishing a reference for selecting the optimal method, we compared the effects of different drainage tube placements on CSDH prognosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous clinical studies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We searched for clinical studies comparing the outcomes of subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage (SPGD) and subdural drainage (SDD) for CSDH published in English prior to April 1, 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

The final analysis included 15 studies involving 4,318 patients.

RESULTS

Our analysis of the pooled results revealed no significant differences in recurrence rate between the SDD and SPGD groups. We also observed no significant differences in mortality or rates of postoperative complications (infection, pneumocephalus, or epilepsy) between the SDD and SPGD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the choice of SDD vs. SPGD has no significant effect on CSDH prognosis, highlighting SPGD as an alternative treatment option for CSDH.

Chronic subdural hematoma drainage using anti-thrombotic catheter technique

Background

Burr hole evacuation is a well-established treatment for symptomatic cases with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Routinely postoperative catheter is left in the subdural space to drain the residual blood. Drainage obstruction is commonly seen, and it can be related to suboptimal treatment.

Methods

Two groups of patients submitted to cSDH surgery were evaluated in a retrospective non-randomized trial, one group that had conventional subdural drainage (CD group, n ​= ​20) and another group that used an anti-thrombotic catheter (AT group, n ​= ​14). We compared the obstruction rate, amount of drainage and complications. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v.28.0).

Results

For AT and CD groups respectively (median ​± ​IQR), the age was 68.23 ​± ​26.0 and 70.94 ​± ​21.5 (p ​> ​0.05); preoperative hematoma width was 18.3 ​± ​11.0 ​mm and 20.7 ​± ​11.7 ​mm and midline shift was 13.0 ​± ​9.2 and 5.2 ​± ​8.0 ​mm (p ​= ​0.49). Postoperative hematoma width was 12.7 ​± ​9.2 ​mm and 10.8 ​± ​9.0 ​mm (p ​< ​0.001 intra-groups compared to preoperative) and MLS was 5.2 ​± ​8.0 ​mm and 1.5 ​± ​4.3 ​mm (p ​< ​0.05 intra-groups). There were no complications related to the procedure including infection, bleed worsening and edema. No proximal obstruction was observed on the AT, but 8/20 (40%) presented proximal obstruction on the CD group (p ​= ​0.006). Daily drainage rates and length of drainage were higher in AT compared to CD: 4.0 ​± ​1.25 days vs. 3.0 ​± ​1.0 days (p ​< ​0.001) and 69.86 ​± ​106.54 vs. 35.00 ​± ​59.67 ​mL/day (p ​= ​0.074). Symptomatic recurrence demanding surgery occurred in two patients of CD group (10%) and none in AT group (p ​= ​0.230), after adjusting for MMA embolization, there was still no difference between groups (p ​= ​0.121).

Conclusion

The anti-thrombotic catheter for cSDH drainage presented significant less proximal obstruction than the conventional one and higher daily drainage rates. Both methods demonstrated to safe and effective for draining cSDH.

Complications From Subdural Drains in Burr Hole Drainage of Chronic and Subacute Subdural Haematomas: A Single-Centre Experience

Introduction The use of drains following the burr-hole evacuation of chronic (CSDH) and subacute subdural haematomas (SASDH) is a well-established practice offering a significant reduction in recurrence rates and improvement of survival. The purpose of this work is to investigate the complication rate of subdural drains following the burr-hole evacuation of CSDH and SASDH. Methods A retrospective review of the clinical records of all patients managed surgically for CSDH or SASDH was conducted. Patients over 18 years, that met the criteria for surgical evacuation, were included in this study. Patients admitted for CSDH or SASDH but managed either conservatively or with craniotomy were excluded from further analysis. Results A total of 97 cases, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 78.25 years were identified in which 122 drains were used. Three complications, two acute subdural haematomas, and one case of drain-associated seizures were identified, yielding an overall complication rate of 3%. Conclusion The use of intradural drains is associated with a small, yet not negligible, possibility of serious complications.

Validating the Efficacy of Two Burr-Hole Craniostomy over Mini-Craniotomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage

Background There is an increasing incidence of chronic subdural hematoma due to extended life expectancy and associated trauma and fall risk. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of two burr-hole craniotomy over mini-craniotomy.

Methods Sixty-five patients were recruited over 2 years, of which 56 were male and 9 were females. A patient with a chronic subdural hematoma either underwent burr-hole craniostomy or mini-craniotomy for hematoma evacuation. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and modified Rankin score were used to assess the neurological status and interventional outcome at discharge and follow-up, respectively. A head CT scan was performed at 3 week and 3 month follow-up.

Statistical Analysis Categorical data are presented as frequency and percentage, while non-categorical data are represented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance for difference in outcome between the two groups was analyzed using the chi-square test and p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results The mean age of patients was 55.6 years. Headache (35 cases), hemiparesis, and altered sensorium were seen in 20 patients, each with the main presenting symptoms. Trauma history was noted in 69.2% of patients. One (3.7%) hematoma recurrence in the burr-hole group and four (8.3%) in the mini-craniotomy group was recorded. The mean operative time was longer in the minicraniotomy group (124.2 min vs. 75.4 min; p < 0.001). A higher incidence of recurrence was noted in the craniotomy group (8.3%) than the burr-hole group (3.7%). No statistical difference in the recurrence rate, duration of hospital stay, GCS at discharge, modified Rankin score between the two study groups at discharge was noted.

Conclusion Two burr-hole craniostomy is a safe and effective surgical option to treat chronic subdural hematoma. It is also validated in patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications with adequate pre-surgical correction of coagulation parameters.

Valve-controlled chronic subdural hematoma drainage: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Pneumocephalus after chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) evacuation is a potential predictor of hematoma recurrence.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To study the feasibility and safety of a novel CSDH evacuation technique using a valve-controlled method to avoid pneumocephalus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective case series, we evacuated CSDH using very low-pressure valve-controlled drains and recorded the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes. Patients with primary CSDH, without previous neurosurgical intervention, and who did not receive antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy the week prior to the index surgery, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the evacuation with other treatment techniques and incomplete data files. Patients were assessed according to the Bender grading system to record the neurological status. The hematoma volume was estimated using the formula for ellipsoid volumes.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with a mean age of 73 years (±9 years) fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Our technique was effective since it decreased the CSDH volume from 141 ​ml (IQR 97 ​ml) to 20.6 ​ml (IQR 26.59 ​ml; p ​< ​0.001) and improved the neurological status according to the Bender grading system from two (IQR 0.25) to 1 (IQR 0). However, pneumocephalus and hematoma recurrence occurred in one case each (2.8%). At six months, all patients returned to their previous status, except for two patients (5.6%) who died due to irrelevant pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Valve-controlled CSDH evacuation aiming to decrease the postoperative pneumocephalus and hematoma recurrence constitutes an effective and safe alternative. However, larger randomized controlled studies are required to establish its role in CSDH management.

National survey on the current practice and attitudes toward the management of chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a frequent pathological entity in daily clinical practice. However, evidence-based CSDH-guidelines are lacking and level I evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is limited. In order to establish and subsequently implement a guideline, insight into current clinical practice and attitudes toward CSDH-treatment is required. The aim is to explore current practice and attitudes toward CSDH-management in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A national online survey was distributed among Dutch neurologists and neurosurgeons, examining variation in current CSDH-management through questions on treatment options, (peri)operative management, willingness to adopt new treatments and by presenting four CSDH-cases.

RESULTS

One hundred nineteen full responses were received (8% of neurologists, N = 66 and 35% of neurosurgeons, N = 53). A majority of the respondents had a positive experience with burr-hole craniostomy (93%) and with a conservative policy (56%). Around a third had a positive experience with the use of dexamethasone as primary (30%) and additional (33.6%) treatment. These numbers were also reflected in the treatment preferences in the presented cases. (Peri)operative management corresponded among responding neurosurgeons. Most respondents would be willing to implement dexamethasone (98%) if equally effective as surgery and tranexamic acid (93%) if effective in CSDH-management.

CONCLUSION

Variation was found regarding preferential CSDH-treatment. However, this is considered not to be insurmountable when implementing evidence-based treatments. This baseline inventory on current clinical practice and current attitudes toward CSDH-treatment is a stepping-stone in the eventual development and implementation of a national guideline.

Factors correlated with the postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma: An umbrella study of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological disease, and the surgical evacuation of subdural collection remains the primary treatment approach for symptomatic patients. Postoperative recurrence is a serious complication, and several factors are correlated with postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their establishment to September 2020. Reports on randomized, prospective, retrospective, and overall observational studies on the management of surgical patients with CSDH were searched, and an independent reviewer performed research quality assessment. Factors that affect the postoperative recurrence of CSDH were extracted: social demographics, drugs (as the main or auxiliary treatment), surgical management, imaging, and other risk factors. We evaluated the recurrence rate of each risk factor. A random effect model was used to perform a meta-analysis, and each risk factor affecting the postoperative recurrence of CSDH was then evaluated and graded.

FINDINGS

In total, 402 studies were included in this analysis and 32 potential risk factors were evaluated. Among these, 21 were significantly associated with the postoperative recurrence of CSDH. Three risk factors (male, bilateral hematoma, and no drainage) had convincing evidence. The classification of evidence can help clinicians identify significant risk factors for the postoperative recurrence of CSDH.

INTERPRETATION

Only few associations were supported by high-quality evidence. Factors with high-quality evidence may be important for treating and preventing CSDH recurrence. Our results can be used as a basis for improving clinical treatment strategies and designing preventive methods.

FUNDING

No funding was received.

Using Local Anesthesia for Burr Hole Surgery of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Reduces Postoperative Complications, Length of Stay, and Hospitalization Cost: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Single Center

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to compare the effects of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) on the surgical process and postoperative recovery of patients with unilateral chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with unilateral CSDH who underwent burr hole surgery between the years 2013 and 2018. Patients who received local anesthesia were allocated to the LA group, and the patients who received general anesthesia were allocated to the GA group. The clinical data, postoperative complication, length of stay, and hospitalization cost of these two groups were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients was collected for this study. Fifty one patients were assigned to the LA group and 54 to GA group. The duration of anesthesia and operation of the LA group was 37.71 (10.55) min; while for the GA group the duration was 56.04 (8.37) min (p < 0.001). The time from operation to discharge in GA group was greatly longer than that in LA group [(8.51 (1.49) days vs. 10.46 (2.34) days, respectively; p < 0.001]. Hospitalization cost for LA group was 2,721.54 (504.66) USD, which was significantly lesser than that for GA patients [3,314.82 (493.52) USD; p < 0.001]. The total number of complications in LA patients was less than that in GA patients [6 vs. 29 cases, respectively; p < 0.001]. The number of patients with residual hematoma in the LA group was <that in the GA group (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

As compared to GA, LA might be a simpler, safer, and more effective method for burr hole surgery of CSDH to promote patients' recovery. However, further research is still required to confirm this conclusion.

Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy in subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr-hole trephination for chronic subdural hematoma

PURPOSE

The treatment of choice for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has been established as burr-hole trephination with drain insertion; however, controversy remains over the best place for the drainage catheter. In this study, we compare the safety and efficacy of a subperiosteal drain (SPD) with that of a subdural drain (SDD) after one burr-hole trephination for CSDH.

METHODS

This retrospective and comparative study includes all CSDH patients treated with burr-hole trephination at our institution between January 2015 and December 2019. 59 patients were treated with SPD insertion (SPD group), and 203 patients were treated with SDD insertion (SDD group).

RESULTS

The median hematoma thickness of the SPD group within 24 h after surgery was significantly thicker than that of the SDD group (9.5 mm vs. 7.5 mm, p = 0.003), but the midline shifting of the SPD group did not differ from that of the SDD group (3.8 mm vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.280). The recurrence rate in the SPD group did not differ significantly from that in the SDD group (13.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.351). The frequency of bleeding events after surgery also did not differ significantly (5.1% vs. 3.5% p-value = 0.636). In contrast to surgery-related morbidities, medical morbidities such as pneumonia were significantly higher in the SDD group (4.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.044). The all-cause mortality rates during the perioperative period did not differ between the two groups (5.1% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.848).

CONCLUSION

Our findings may suggest that burr-hole trephination with SPD insertion had better surgical feasibility and fewer perioperative complications than SDD insertion. The type of anesthesia seems to be related with fewer medical complications at perioperative period. Larger, randomized clinical trials focusing not only the drain type but anesthesia type, are needed to validate our findings.

History and current progress of chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is characterized by an encapsulated collection of old blood. Although CSDH has become the most frequent pathologic entity in daily neurosurgical practice, there are some unresolved research questions. In particular, the causes and recurrent risk factors of CSDH remain as an object of debate. The split of the dural border layer forms a few tiers of dural border cells over the arachnoid layer. Tissue plasminogen activator plays an important role as a key factor of defective coagulation. Historically, CSDH has often been treated via burr hole craniostomy using a closed drainage system. Several different operative strategies and peri-operative strategies such as the addition of burr holes, addition of cavity irrigation, position of drain, or postural position, have been described previously. Although the direction of the drainage tube, residual air, low intensity of T1-weighted images on MRI, and niveau formation have been reported as risk factors for recurrence, antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug use has not yet been verified as a risk factor. Recently, pharmaceutical strategies, including atorvastatin, significantly improved the neurological function in CSDH patients. Many case series, without randomization, have been reported; and given its promising result, several randomized clinical trials using pharmaceutical as well as operative and perioperative strategies were initiated to obtain sufficient data. In contrast, relatively fewer basic studies have achieved clinical applications in CSDH, although it is one of the most common clinical entities. Further scientific basic research may be essential for achieving a novel treatment strategy for CSDH.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH): A review of the current state of the art

Introduction

Incidence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is rising worldwide, partly due to an aging population, but also due to increased use of antithrombotic medication. Many recent studies have emerged to address current cSDH management strategies.

Research question

What is the state of the art of cSDH management.

Material and methods

Review.

Results

Head trauma, antithrombotic use and craniocerebral disproportion increase the risk of cSDH development. Most patients present with disorientation, GCS 13–15, and symptoms arising from cortical irritation and increased intracranial pressure. cSDH occurs bilaterally in 9–22%. CT allows assessment of cerebral compression (herniation, hematoma thickness, ventricle collapse, midline shift), hematoma age and presence of membranes, factors that ultimately determine treatment urgency and surgical approach. Recurrence remains the principle complication (9–33%), occurring more commonly with older age and bilateral cSDHs.

Discussion and conclusion

While incompletely understood, it is generally believed that injury in the dural cell layer results in bleeding from bridging veins, resulting in a hematoma formation, with or without a preceding hygroma, in a potential space approximating the junction between the dura and arachnoid. Neovascularization and leaking from the outer membrane are thought to propagate this process. Evidence that MMA embolization may reduce recurrence rates is a potentially exciting new treatment option, but also supports the theory that the MMA is implicated in the cSDH pathophysiology. The use of steroids remains a controversial topic without clear treatment guidelines. cSDH represents a common neurosurgical problem with burr-hole treatment remaining the gold standard, often in conjunction with subgaleal drains. MMA embolization to stop recurrence may represent an important evolution in understanding the pathophysiology of cSDH and improving treatment.

•

Incidence of cSDH is rising, partly due to the aging population and increased antithrombotic use.

•

cSDH occurs bilaterally in 9–22% of cases.

•

Recurrence remains the principle complication and has been estimated at 9–33%.

•

Risk factors for recurrence include old age and bilateral cSDHs.

•

MMA embolization may reduce recurrence, but its efficacy and target population remain unclear.

Drain type after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma in geriatric patients: a subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) occurs more frequently in elderly patients, while older patient age is associated with worse postoperative outcome following burr-hole drainage (BHD) of cSDH. The cSDH-Drain trial showed comparable recurrence rates after BHD and placement of either a subperiosteal drain (SPD) or subdural drain (SDD). Additionally, an SPD showed a significantly lower rate of infections as well as iatrogenic parenchymal injuries through drain misplacement. This post hoc analysis aims to compare recurrence rates and clinical outcomes following BHD of cSDH and the placement of SPDs or SDDs in elderly patients.

METHODS

The study included 104 patients (47.3%) 80 years of age and older from the 220 patients recruited in the preceding cSDH-Drain trial. SPDs and SDDs were compared with regard to recurrence rate, morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcome. A post hoc analysis using logistic regression, comparing the outcome measurements for patients < 80 and ≥ 80 years old in a univariate analysis and stratified for drain type, was further completed.

RESULTS

Patients ≥ 80 years of age treated with an SDD showed higher recurrence rates (12.8%) compared with those treated with an SPD (8.2%), without a significant difference (p = 0.46). Significantly higher drain misplacement rates were observed for patients older than 80 years and treated with an SDD compared with an SPD (0% vs 20%, p = 0.01). Comparing patients older than 80 years to younger patients, significantly higher overall mortality (15.4% vs 5.2%, p = 0.012), 30-day mortality (3.8% vs 0%, p = 0.033), and surgical mortality (2.9% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034) rates were observed. Clinical outcome at the 12-month follow-up was significantly worse for patients ≥ 80 years old, and logistic regression showed a significant association of age with outcome, while drain type had no association with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial findings of the cSDH-Drain trial and the findings of this subanalysis suggest that SPD may be warranted in elderly patients. As opposed to drain type, patient age (> 80 years) was significantly associated with worse outcome, as well as higher morbidity and mortality rates.