1
|
Jha R, Blitz SE, Chua MMJ, Warren AEL, Lee JW, Rolston JD. Surgical management of status epilepticus: A systematic review. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:850-864. [PMID: 38456595 PMCID: PMC11145616 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Status Epilepticus (SE), unresponsive to medical management, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Surgical management is typically considered in these refractory cases. The best surgical approach for affected patients remains unclear; however, given the lack of controlled trials exploring the role of surgery. We performed a systematic review according to PRIMSA guidelines, including case reports and series describing surgical interventions for patients in SE. Cases (157 patients, median age 12.9 years) were followed for a median of 12 months. Patients were in SE for a median of 21 days before undergoing procedures including: focal resection (36.9%), functional hemispherectomy (21%), lobar resection (12.7%), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) (12.7%), deep brain stimulation (DBS) (6.4%), multiple subpial transection (MST) (3.8%), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) (1.9%), and cortical stimulator placement (1.27%), with 24 patients undergoing multiple procedures. Multiple SE semiologies were identified. 47.8% of patients had focal seizures, and 65% of patients had focal structural abnormalities on MRI. SE persisted for 36.8 ± 47.7 days prior to surgical intervention. SE terminated following surgery in 81.5%, terminated with additional adjuncts in 10.2%, continued in 1.9%, and was not specified in 6.4% of patients. Long-term seizure outcomes were favorable, with the majority improved and 51% seizure-free. Eight patients passed away in follow-up, of which three were in SE. Seizures emerging from one hemisphere were both more likely to immediately terminate (OR 4.7) and lead to long-term seizure-free status (OR 3.9) compared to nonunilateral seizures. No other predictors, including seizure focality, SE duration, or choice of surgical procedure, were predictors of SE termination. Surgical treatment of SE can be effective in terminating SE and leading to sustained seizure freedom, with many different procedures showing efficacy if matched appropriately with SE semiology and etiology. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with persistent seizures (Status Epilepticus) that do not stop following medications can be treated effectively with surgery. Here, we systematically review the entirety of existing literature on surgery for treating status epilepticus to better identify how and when surgery is used and what patients do after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Jha
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sarah E. Blitz
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Melissa M. J. Chua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Aaron E. L. Warren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jong Woo Lee
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - John D. Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Furlanis GM, Favaro J, Bresolin N, Grioni D, Baro V, D’Amico A, Sartori S, Denaro L, Landi A. Role of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory and Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Pediatric Case Series. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1589. [PMID: 38002548 PMCID: PMC10669853 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Status epilepticus is a life-threatening condition that is defined as refractory (RSE) when the seizure activity continues despite treatment with benzodiazepine and a second appropriate treatment. Super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an RSE that persists or recurs for ≥24 h. Few papers have reported the outcomes of pediatric patients affected by RSE and SRSE and treated with neuromodulation therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. We present our findings of pediatric patients treated with VNS for RSE/SRSE. METHODS We present a case series of seven consecutive pediatric patients treated with VNS for SRSE since 2012 by a single surgeon in Monza and Padua. A rapid titration was started soon after implantation. We considered electroclinical data before and after VNS implantation and at the last follow-up. RESULTS We achieved the resolution of SRSE in five out of seven patients in a mean time of two weeks. At the last follow-up, these patients had a significant reduction of seizure burden without any relapse of SE. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Based on our limited findings, we discuss the potential role of VNS therapy in similar but distinct clinical contexts. For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and RSE/SRSE, prompt VNS consideration is suggested, offering rapid responses and potentially reducing pharmacological load. Meanwhile, in NORSE/FIRES, we suggest early neuromodulation during the acute phase if standard treatments prove ineffective or not tolerated. This approach may leverage VNS's potential anti-inflammatory effects and neuromodulation, enhancing patient-specific treatments. Expanding case studies and prolonged follow-ups are recommended to strengthen these clinical insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Melinda Furlanis
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Jacopo Favaro
- Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy; (J.F.)
| | - Nicola Bresolin
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| | | | - Valentina Baro
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Alberto D’Amico
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Stefano Sartori
- Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy; (J.F.)
| | - Luca Denaro
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Andrea Landi
- Pediatric and Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 5, 35127 Padova, Italy; (G.M.F.); (A.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stavropoulos I, Pak HL, Alarcon G, Valentin A. Neuromodulation Techniques in Children with Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1527. [PMID: 38002487 PMCID: PMC10670094 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13111527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition and medical emergency which can have lifelong consequences, including neuronal death and alteration of neuronal networks, resulting in long-term neurologic and cognitive deficits in children. When standard pharmacological treatment for SE is not successful in controlling seizures, the condition evolves to refractory SE (rSE) and finally to super-refractory SE (srSE) if it exceeds 24 h despite using anaesthetics. In this systematic review, we present literature data on the potential uses of clinical neuromodulation techniques for the management of srSE in children, including electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. The evaluation of these techniques is limited by the small number of published paediatric cases (n = 25, one with two techniques) in peer-reviewed articles (n = 18). Although neuromodulation strategies have not been tested through randomised, prospective controlled clinical trials, this review presents the existing data and the potential benefits of neuromodulation therapy, suggesting that these techniques, when available, could be considered at earlier stages within the course of srSE intending to prevent long-term neurologic complications. Clinical trials aiming to establish whether early intervention can prevent long-term sequelae are necessary in order to establish the potential clinical value of neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of srSE in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Stavropoulos
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK;
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Ho Lim Pak
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK;
| | - Gonzalo Alarcon
- Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
| | - Antonio Valentin
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK;
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jindal M, Delaj L, Winston J, Goel R, Bhatti S, Angelova-Chee M, Selway R, Mantoan Ritter L. Safe and effective implantation and use of vagal nerve stimulation in new-onset refractory status epilepticus in early pregnancy: a case report. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1183080. [PMID: 37255724 PMCID: PMC10225632 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1183080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The management of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in pregnancy may be complicated by anti-seizure medication (ASM) polytherapy-associated teratogenicity. We aim to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) in a pregnant patient presenting with NORSE. Case description A 30-year old female, at 5-weeks' gestation presented with drug-refractory myoclonic status epilepticus, responsive only to high levels of anesthetic agents. The severity of seizures did not allow extubation, and the patient remained ventilated and sedated. VNS was implanted 26 days after seizure onset. The immediate post-operative output was 0.25 mA, which was rapidly titrated up to 0.5 mA the next morning, and to 0.75 mA that afternoon. This was further increased to 1.0 mA on 3rd day post-operation, and to 1.25 mA 7 days post-op. Myoclonic jerks diminished significantly 7 days post-op, allowing extubation. Twenty days after VNS implantation, no myoclonic jerks were observed. There was also a notable neurological improvement including increased alertness and mobility, and ability to obey commands. Drug overdose was subsequently found to be the most likely etiology of her NORSE. An early pregnancy assessment 17 days after VNS implantation showed a normally sited pregnancy, normal fetal heart activity and crown-rump length. The patient remained seizure free, gained functional independence and delivered a premature but otherwise healthy baby at 33 weeks' gestation. Conclusion NORSE is challenging to manage, further compounded in pregnancy due to the teratogenicity of ASMs and ASM polytherapy. This is the first case-study to report the safe implantation and use of VNS during the first trimester of pregnancy for the management of NORSE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malaika Jindal
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Delaj
- Department of Neurology, East Kent Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - Joel Winston
- Department of Neurophsyiology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rishu Goel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, East Kent Hospitals University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Kent, United Kingdom
| | - Sadia Bhatti
- Department of Obstetrics, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Richard Selway
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mamaril-Davis J, Vessell M, Ball T, Palade A, Shafer C, Aguilar-Salinas P, Fowler B, Mirro E, Neimat J, Sagi V, Bina RW. Combined Responsive Neurostimulation and Focal Resection for Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Illustrative Case Report. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:195-204.e7. [PMID: 35948220 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a neurologic emergency with high mortality and morbidity. Although medical algorithms typically are effective, when they do fail, options may be limited, and neurosurgical intervention should be considered. METHODS We report a case of SRSE treated acutely with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and focal surgical resection after intracranial monitoring. We also conducted a systematic review of the literature for neurosurgical treatment of SRSE (e.g., neurostimulation). Only published manuscripts were considered. RESULTS Our patient's seizure semiology consisted of left facial twitching with frequent evolution to bilateral tonic-clonic convulsions. Stereoelectroencephalography and grid monitoring identified multiple seizure foci. The patient underwent right RNS placement with cortical strip leads over the lateral primary motor and premotor cortex as well as simultaneous right superior temporal and frontopolar resection. Status epilepticus resolved 21 days after surgical resection and placement of the RNS. The systematic review revealed 15 case reports describing 17 patients with SRSE who underwent acute neurosurgical intervention. There were 3 patients with SRSE with RNS placement as a single modality, all of whom experienced cessation of SE. Four patients with SRSE received vagus nerve stimulation (3 as a single modality and 1 with combined corpus callosotomy), of whom 1 had SE recurrence at 2weeks. Two patients with SRSE received deep brain stimulation, and the remaining 8 underwent surgical resection; none had recurrence of SE. CONCLUSIONS RNS System placement with or without resection can be a viable treatment option for select patients with SRSE. Early neurosurgical intervention may improve seizure outcomes and reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Mamaril-Davis
- College of Medicine, The University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Meena Vessell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville Restorative Neuroscience, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Tyler Ball
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville Restorative Neuroscience, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Adriana Palade
- Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Christopher Shafer
- Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Pedro Aguilar-Salinas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center/The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Emily Mirro
- Neuropace, Inc., Mountain View, California, USA
| | - Joseph Neimat
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville Restorative Neuroscience, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Vishwanath Sagi
- Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Robert W Bina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center/The University of Arizona-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tzadok M, Verner R, Kann L, Tungala D, Gordon C, El Tahry R, Fahoum F. Rapid titration of VNS therapy reduces time-to-response in epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 134:108861. [PMID: 35963047 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common titration strategies for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) prioritize monitoring of tolerability during small increases in stimulation intensity over several months. Prioritization of tolerability is partially based on how quickly side effects can be perceived and reported by patients, and the delayed onset of clinical benefits from VNS. However, many practices assess the clinical benefit of VNS at one year after implantation, and excessive caution during the titration phase can significantly delay target dosing or prevent a patient from reaching a therapeutic dose entirely. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize the relationship between titration speed and the onset of clinical response to VNS. METHODS To assess differences between more aggressive titration strategies and more conservative ones, we analyzed the relationship between time-to-dose and time-to-response using a weighted Cox regression. The target dose was empirically defined as 1.625 mA output current delivered at 250 microsecond pulse widths at 20 Hz. Patient-level outcomes and dosing data were segregated into fast (<3 months), medium (3-6 months), and slow (>6 months) cohorts based on their titration speed. RESULTS The statistical model revealed a significant relationship between titration speed and onset of clinical response, defined as a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency. Frequency of adverse events reported between each cohort trended toward higher rates of adverse events in adults who were titrated quickly; however, the pediatric population appeared to be more tolerant of titration at any speed. CONCLUSIONS This analysis indicates that faster titration yields faster onset of clinical benefit and is especially practical in the pediatric population, though attempts to accelerate adult titration may still be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Tzadok
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pediatric Neurology Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
| | - Ryan Verner
- LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom
| | - Lennart Kann
- LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom
| | - Deepika Tungala
- LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Gordon
- LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom
| | - Riëm El Tahry
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium; Centre for Refractory Epilepsy, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Firas Fahoum
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luo T, Wang Y, Lu G, Zhou Y, Wang Y. Vagus nerve stimulation for super-refractory status epilepticus in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome: a pediatric case report and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 2022; 38:1401-1404. [PMID: 34762158 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a devastating epileptic encephalopathy with limited treatment options and unclear etiology. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an FDA-approved therapy for refractory epilepsy that has been shown to decrease the frequency and severity of seizures. There is a growing interest in alternate non-pharmaceutical therapies for managing super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). We present a 29-month-old case, diagnosed with FIRES, whose seizures were successfully controlled by utilization of VNS after ineffective response to intensive pharmacotherapy and ketogenic diet treatment. The VNS was planted after 14 days of refractory seizure activity with a following rapid parameter titration for 42 days without evident side effect, which finally controlled the seizure in the acute phase. VNS may be a potential candidate for the treatment of SRSE in FIRES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Luo
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, No. 399, Wanyuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixue Wang
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoping Lu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanfeng Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, No. 399, Wanyuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, No. 399, Wanyuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu S, Xiong Z, Wang J, Tang C, Deng J, Zhang J, Guo M, Guan Y, Zhou J, Zhai F, Luan G, Li T. Efficacy and potential predictors of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in refractory postencephalitic epilepsy. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2022; 13:20406223211066738. [PMID: 35070253 PMCID: PMC8771757 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211066738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a therapeutic approach for patients with refractory postencephalitic epilepsy (PEE), which is characterized by drug resistance and disappointing surgical outcomes. However, the efficacy of VNS has not yet been studied in patients with refractory PEE. The present study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of VNS and evaluate potential clinical predictors in patients with refractory PEE. METHODS We retrospectively collected the outcomes of VNS with at least a 1-year follow-up in all patients with refractory PEE. Subgroups were classified as responders and non-responders according to the efficacy of VNS (⩾50% or < 50% reduction in seizure frequency). Preoperative data were analyzed to screen for potential predictors of VNS responsiveness. RESULTS A total of 42 refractory PEE patients who underwent VNS therapy were enrolled, with an average age of 21.13 ± 9.70 years. Seizure frequency was reduced by more than 50% in 64.25% of patients, and 7.14% of patients achieved seizure-free events after VNS therapy. In addition, the response rates increased over time, with 40.5%, 50.0% and 57.1%, respectively at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after VNS therapy. Preoperative duration of epilepsy, monthly seizure frequency, and spatial distribution of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) were correlated with responders (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis. Further multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that refractory PEE patients with high monthly seizure frequency or Focal IEDs (focal or multifocal epileptiform discharges) achieved better efficacy on VNS (p = 0.010, p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION VNS is an effective palliative therapy for patients with refractory PEE. Focal IEDs (focal or multifocal epileptiform discharges) and high seizure frequency were potential preoperative predictors of effectiveness after VNS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Liu
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhonghua Xiong
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chongyang Tang
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiahui Deng
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyi Guo
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuguang Guan
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Zhai
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guoming Luan
- Department of Brain Institute, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy Research, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianfu Li
- Department of Neurology, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, XiangshanYikesong 50, Haidian District, Beijing 100093, China
| |
Collapse
|