Unfavorable Outcomes Related to Endovascular Treatment of Giant Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms

Complications after endovascular treatment of large basilar trunk aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Large basilar trunk aneurysms (BTAs) have a poor natural history if left untreated and always pose a significant challenge to endovascular treatment. The present study aimed to analyze the complications after endovascular treatment of large BTAs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Between January 2015 and September 2022, 9116 patients with intracranial aneurysms came to our institution for management, of which 34 patients with 34 large (≥10 mm) BTAs were treated with endovascular treatment. Postprocedural complications, clinical, and angiographic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

All 34 patients (34 aneurysms) were successfully treated, of which 13 aneurysms were treated with flow diversion (FD), and 21 aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling. Neurological complications occurred in 12 (35.3%) patients, with 7 (20.6%) deaths. Ischemic complications occurred in 10 (29.4%) patients, and 4 (11.8%) patients experienced hemorrhagic events. The incidences of favorable outcomes at discharge and last follow-up were 85.3% and 75.8%, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 86.5% and 71.4%, respectively. Unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice was associated with postprocedural complications (hazard ratio: 3.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-13.25, p = 0.041). The postprocedural complication rates were comparable between patients treated with FD and stent-assisted coiling (5/13, 38.5% vs. 7/21, 33.3%, p > 0.99). Angiography follow-up was available for 21 patients, and complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 16/21 (76.2%) aneurysms.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment might be a feasible option for treating large BTAs. However, clinicians should be alerted to procedure-related complications, especially ischemic complications that cause disability or death. Unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice might be associated with postprocedural complications.

Periprocedural cerebrovascular complications and 30-day outcomes of endovascular treatment for intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The authors undertook an evaluation of periprocedural cerebrovascular complications and 30-day outcomes of endovascular treatment for intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (IVADAs) and assessed the relevant risk factors.

METHODS

The authors included a series of 195 patients who had undergone endovascular treatment for 198 IVADAs. Clinical data, morphological characteristics, treatment details, and periprocedural cerebrovascular complications including intraprocedural rupture, intraprocedural thrombosis, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and ischemic stroke (IS) were recorded. After evaluation of the 30-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, the authors applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors for complications and 30-day unfavorable clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no intraprocedural ruptures, but the authors recorded intraprocedural thrombosis (n = 5), ICH (n = 3), TIA (n = 1), and IS (n = 13), comprising an 11.1% (22/198) complication rate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-8.41, p = 0.020), IS history (OR 5.55, 95% CI 1.46-21.01, p = 0.012), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.52-13.20, p = 0.007) were risk factors for overall complications, whereas aneurysmal height (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.032) was a protective factor. SAH (OR 6.44, 95% CI 1.54-26.89, p = 0.011) and preprocedural mRS score > 2 (OR 5.07, 95% CI 1.01-25.59, p = 0.049) were independent risk factors for perforator occlusion stroke. Periprocedural cerebrovascular complications (OR 32.09, 95% CI 3.00-343.94, p = 0.004) and preprocedural mRS score > 2 (OR 319.92, 95% CI 30.28-3379.98, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 30-day unfavorable clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperlipidemia, IS history, and SAH were independent predictors for overall periprocedural cerebrovascular complications of endovascular treatment for IVADAs, but aneurysmal height was an independent protective factor. SAH and preprocedural mRS score > 2 were independent risk factors for perforator occlusion stroke. Preprocedural mRS score > 2 and periprocedural complications were independent risk factors for 30-day unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Conservative Therapy vs. Endovascular Approach for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Trunk Large Aneurysms: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk large (≥10 mm) aneurysms (IVBTLAs) are rare and challenging to manage. In this study, we describe the natural prognosis and evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of IVBTLAs compared with conservative therapy.

Methods

This prospective multicenter cohort study included patients with IVBTLAs, who chose either endovascular treatment (endovascular group) or conservative therapy (conservative group) after discussion with their doctors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the target vessel, while secondary endpoints included target vessel-related mortality, major stroke, other serious adverse events, and aneurysm occlusion rate.

Results

In total, 258 patients were referred to our two centers for the management of vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and 69 patients had IVBTLAs. Among them, 51 patients underwent endovascular treatment, and 18 patients received conservative therapy. The incidence of target vessel-related SAEs was 15.7% (8/51) in the endovascular group and 44.4% (8/18) in the conservative group (P = 0.031). The target vessel-related mortality was 2.0% (1/51) in the endovascular group and 38.9% (7/18) in the conservative group (P < 0.001). The cumulative survival rates in the endovascular group and conservative group within 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 98.0% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.020; 98.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.001; and 98.0% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset as risks factor for SAEs.

Conclusions

Compared with conservative treatment, endovascular treatment of the IVBTLAs may be associated with a lower incidence of SAEs, with higher 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates. Conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset were associated with a high risk of SAEs.

Flow Diversion vs. Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Treatment of Intradural Large Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysms

Objective

To compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed.

Results

A total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications.

Conclusion

There was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications.

Endovascular Management of Vertebrobasilar Trunk Artery Large Aneurysms: Complications and Long-Term Results

Objective

To analyze the complications and long-term results of endovascular management of vertebrobasilar trunk large (≥10 mm) aneurysms (VBTLAs) and identify predictors of outcomes.

Methods

Between 2014 and 2020, 6,987 patients with intracranial aneurysms were referred to our center for aneurysm management and 2,224 patients have undergone the endovascular procedures. We retrospectively reviewed the database and identify all the patients with VBTLAs.

Results

A total of 62 VBTLAs were identified. The median aneurysm size was 13.4 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 11.5–18.7]. Among them, 24 aneurysms were treated with overlapping stent techniques, 18 aneurysms were treated with flow diversion, 14 aneurysms were treated with single stent-assisted coiling, and 6 aneurysms were treated with coiling alone. Ten patients were treated with parent artery occlusion or unilateral vertebral artery occlusion. Periprocedural complications were occurred in 7 (11.3%) patients. Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 27.5 months (IQR 15.3–58.5). The overall complication rate was 16.1% (10/62), including nine ischemic events and one hemorrhagic event. The combined disability and neurological mortality rate was 12.9% (8/62), with 4 (6.5%) deaths. The favorable outcome rate at follow-up was 87.1% (54/62). The complication-free cumulative survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 86.8 and 82.0%, respectively. The overall cumulative survival rates at 1 and 5 year were 96.5 and 89.8%, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, longer procedure time (>115 min) (P = 0.037) and ischemic onset (P = 0.005) predict complications. Angiography follow-up was available for 36 patients at the median of 6.0 months (IQR 6–12), with a complete occlusion rate of 77.8% (28/36). Two (5.6%) aneurysms were recanalized and subsequently received the retreatment. Subgroup analysis did not find any differences in the complete occlusion rate between endovascular strategies.

Conclusion

Endovascular management of VBTLAs has a reasonable safety profile with favorable 5-year cumulative survival rates and imaging outcomes at follow-up. Prolonged procedure and ischemic onset are associated with a high risk of overall complications.

Direct Vertebral Artery Access for Coil Embolization of a Partially Thrombosed Mid-Basilar Trunk Aneurysm: Technical Limitations

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Partially thrombosed basilar aneurysms have a high morbidity from the rupture risk and mass effect prompting early treatment. Depending on the size and location, they pose a surgical challenge often requiring multiple endovascular treatment modalities. Here we present a partially thrombosed mid-basilar aneurysm successfully coil embolized with direct vertebral artery access and discuss the technical limitations of direct V1 access.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 70-yr-old woman presented with acute onset headache, nausea, and vomiting. A computed tomography (CT) head demonstrated a hyperdense prepontine mass which was further characterized as a partially thrombosed basilar aneurysm on CT angiography. After multiple failed attempts to access the vertebral artery via femoral and radial access the patient was taken to the operating room (OR) for surgical exposure of the right V1 segment and direct cannulation of the vertebral artery. The aneurysm was successfully coiled and the vertebral artery closed primarily. The patient was discharged home without any neurological deficits.

CONCLUSION

Partially thrombosed mid-basilar aneurysms are difficult to treat both surgically and endovascularly. We present a case where endovascular access to the aneurysm was very challenging requiring direct exposure and cannulation of the V1 segment to successfully embolize with coils and discuss the technical limitations of this approach.