1
|
Dorotan MKC, Tobochnik S. Patient-Centered Management of Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2024:10.1007/s11910-024-01360-z. [PMID: 39017829 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01360-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Brain tumor-related epilepsy is a heterogenous syndrome involving variability in incidence, timing, pathophysiology, and clinical risk factors for seizures across different brain tumor pathologies. Seizure risk and disability are dynamic over the course of disease and influenced by tumor-directed treatments, necessitating individualized patient-centered management strategies to optimize quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS Recent translational findings in diffuse gliomas indicate a dynamic bidirectional relationship between glioma growth and hyperexcitability. Certain non-invasive measures of hyperexcitability are correlated with survival outcomes, however it remains uncertain how to define and measure clinically relevant hyperexcitability serially over time. The extent of resection, timing of pre-operative and/or post-operative seizures, and the likelihood of tumor progression are critical factors impacting the risk of seizure recurrence. Newer anti-seizure medications are generally well-tolerated with similar efficacy in this population, and several rapid-onset seizure rescue agents are in development and available. Seizures in patients with brain tumors are strongly influenced by the underlying tumor biology and treatment. An improved understanding of the interactions between tumor cells and the spectrum of hyperexcitability will facilitate targeted therapies. Multidisciplinary management of seizures should occur with consideration of tumor-directed therapy and prognosis, and anti-seizure medication decision-making tailored to the individual priorities and quality of life of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S. Huntington Ave., 6th Floor, Neurology Service, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Szaflarski JP, Besson H, D'Souza W, Faught E, Klein P, Reuber M, Rosenow F, Salas-Puig J, Soto Insuga V, Steinhoff BJ, Strzelczyk A, Bourikas D, Daniels T, Floricel F, Friesen D, Laloyaux C, Villanueva V. Effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam in patients with epilepsy stratified by comorbidities and etiology in the real world: 12-month subgroup data from the international EXPERIENCE pooled analysis. J Neurol 2024; 271:3169-3185. [PMID: 38436680 PMCID: PMC11136785 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12253-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with epilepsy by specific comorbidities and epilepsy etiologies. METHODS EXPERIENCE/EPD332 was a pooled analysis of individual patient records from several non-interventional studies of patients with epilepsy initiating BRV in clinical practice. Outcomes included ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency, seizure freedom (no seizures within prior 3 months), continuous seizure freedom (no seizures since baseline), BRV discontinuation, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Analyses were performed for all adult patients (≥ 16 years of age) and stratified by comorbidity and by etiology at baseline (patients with cognitive/learning disability [CLD], psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy [BTRE], and traumatic brain injury-related epilepsy [TBIE]). RESULTS At 12 months, ≥ 50% seizure reduction was achieved in 35.6% (n = 264), 38.7% (n = 310), 41.7% (n = 24), 34.1% (n = 41), and 50.0% (n = 28) of patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, respectively; and continuous seizure freedom was achieved in 5.7% (n = 318), 13.7% (n = 424), 29.4% (n = 34), 11.4% (n = 44), and 13.8% (n = 29), respectively. During the study follow-up, in patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE, 37.1% (n = 403), 30.7% (n = 605), 33.3% (n = 51), 39.7% (n = 68), and 27.1% (n = 49) of patients discontinued BRV, respectively; and TEAEs since prior visit at 12 months were reported in 11.3% (n = 283), 10.0% (n = 410), 16.7% (n = 36), 12.5% (n = 48), and 3.0% (n = 33), respectively. CONCLUSIONS BRV as prescribed in the real world is effective and well tolerated among patients with CLD, psychiatric comorbidity, post-stroke epilepsy, BTRE, and TBIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerzy P Szaflarski
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Heersink School of Medicine Department of Neurology and UAB Epilepsy Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | - Wendyl D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Pavel Klein
- Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Felix Rosenow
- Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Victor Soto Insuga
- Pediatric Neurology, Hospital Universitario Infantil Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bernhard J Steinhoff
- Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork and Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- LOEWE Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, EpiCARE member, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhai W, Yu Q, Wu H. The efficacy and safety of novel antiepileptic drugs in treatment of epilepsy of patients with brain tumors. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1344775. [PMID: 38523608 PMCID: PMC10958780 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1344775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in treating epilepsy in patients with brain tumors (BTRE). Methods A search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023, with English language restriction. Results In this meta-analysis, 18 clinical trials involving 755 BTRE patients were included to assess the efficacy and safety of novel AEDs in BTRE treatment. At the last follow-up, a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was experienced by 72% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.64-0.78) using novel AEDs. At the last follow-up, seizure freedom was experienced by 34% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.28-0.41) using novel AEDs. The pooled incidence of AEs was found to be 19% (95% CI: 13%-26%), with a withdrawal rate due to adverse effects of only 3%. Comparable efficacy and incidence of adverse effects were observed between lacosamide and perampanel. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that novel antiepileptic drugs are deemed effective for seizure control in brain tumor patients, particularly when used as adjunctive therapy. Although lacosamide and perampanel received more focus in studies, no significant difference was observed in the efficacy and adverse reactions of these two drugs in seizure control. Further randomized controlled trials are deemed necessary to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Zhai
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- National Clinical Drug Monitoring Center, Department of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qiaoling Yu
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- National Clinical Drug Monitoring Center, Department of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Huizhen Wu
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- National Clinical Drug Monitoring Center, Department of Pharmacy, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Newton HB, Wojkowski J. Antiepileptic Strategies for Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:389-403. [PMID: 38353859 PMCID: PMC10894758 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01182-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Seizure activity is common in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors, affecting more than 50% of cases over the course of their disease. Several mechanisms contribute to brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), including a pro-inflammatory environment, excessive secretion of glutamate and an increase in neuronal excitatory tone, reduction of GABAergic inhibitory activity, and an increase in 2-hydroxygluturate production in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant tumors. After a verified seizure in a brain tumor patient, the consensus is that BTRE has developed, and it is necessary to initiate an antiepileptic drug (AED). It is not recommended to initiate AED prophylaxis. Second- and third-generation AEDs are the preferred options for initiation, due to a lack of hepatic enzyme induction and reduced likelihood for drug-drug interactions, especially in regard to neoplastic treatment. The efficacy of appropriate AEDs for patients with BTRE is fairly equivalent, although some data suggests that levetiracetam may be slightly more active in suppressing seizures than other AEDs. The consensus among most Neuro-Oncology providers is to initiate levetiracetam monotherapy after a first seizure in a brain tumor patient, as long as the patient does not have any psychiatric co-morbidities. If levetiracetam is not tolerated well or is ineffective, other appropriate initial AED options for monotherapy or as an add-on anticonvulsant include lacosamide, valproic acid, briviracetam, lamotrigine, and perampanel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert B Newton
- Neuro-Oncology Center and Brain Tumor Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Hanna Hall 5th Floor, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Jenna Wojkowski
- Neuro-Oncology Center and Brain Tumor Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Hanna Hall 5th Floor, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Avila EK, Tobochnik S, Inati SK, Koekkoek JAF, McKhann GM, Riviello JJ, Rudà R, Schiff D, Tatum WO, Templer JW, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:7-24. [PMID: 37699031 PMCID: PMC10768995 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward K Avila
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara K Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Guy M McKhann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James J Riviello
- Division of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini,” University of Turin, Italy
| | - David Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William O Tatum
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica W Templer
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hauff NS, Storstein A. Seizure Management and Prophylaxis Considerations in Patients with Brain Tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:787-792. [PMID: 37071297 PMCID: PMC10256653 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01410-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The article gives an overview of the current knowledge in the management of tumor related epilepsy, including systematic reviews and consensus statements as well as recent insight into a potentially more individualized treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS Tumor molecular markers as IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status may provide future treatment targets. Seizure control should be included as a metric in assessing efficacy of tumor treatment. Prophylactic treatment is recommended in all brain tumor patients after the first seizure. Epilepsy has a profound effect on the quality of life in this patient group. The clinician should tailor the choice of seizure prophylactic treatment to the individual patient, with the goal of limiting adverse effects, avoiding interactions and obtaining a high degree of seizure freedom. Status epilepticus is associated with inferior survival and must be treated promptly. A multidisciplinary team should treat patients with brain tumors and epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Stenvågnes Hauff
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Anette Storstein
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sokolov E, Dietrich J, Cole AJ. The complexities underlying epilepsy in people with glioblastoma. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:505-516. [PMID: 37121239 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00031-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Seizures are among the most common clinical signs in people with glioblastoma. Advances over the past 5 years, including new clinical trial data, have increased the understanding of why some individuals with glioblastoma are susceptible to seizures, how seizures manifest clinically, and what implications seizures have for patient management. The pathophysiology of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma relates to a combination of intrinsic epileptogenicity of tumour tissue, alterations in the tumour and peritumoural microenvironment, and the physical and functional disturbance of adjacent brain structures. Successful management of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma remains challenging; factors such as drug-drug interactions between cancer therapies and antiseizure medications, and medication side-effects, can affect seizure outcomes and quality of life. Advances in novel therapies provide some promise for people with glioblastoma; however, the effects of these therapies on seizures are yet to be fully determined. Looking forward, insights into electrical activity as a driver of tumour cell growth and the intrinsic hyperexcitability of tumour tissue might represent useful targets for treatment and disease modification. There is a pressing need for large randomised clinical trials in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisaveta Sokolov
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, London, UK; Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Cancer and Neurotoxicity Clinic and Brain Repair Research Program, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew J Cole
- MGH Epilepsy Service, Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koekkoek JAF, van der Meer PB, Pace A, Hertler C, Harrison R, Leeper HE, Forst DA, Jalali R, Oliver K, Philip J, Taphoorn MJB, Dirven L, Walbert T. Palliative care and end-of-life care in adults with malignant brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:447-456. [PMID: 36271873 PMCID: PMC10013651 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with malignant brain tumors. It provides an overview of palliative care options, including during the end-of-life phase for patients with malignant brain tumors. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted from 2016 to 2021 focusing on four main topics: (1) symptom management, (2) caregiver needs, (3) early palliative care, and (4) care in the end-of-life phase. An international panel of palliative care experts in neuro-oncology synthesized the literature and reported the most relevant updates. A total of 140 articles were included. RESULTS New insights include that: Hippocampal avoidance and stereotactic radiosurgery results in a lower risk of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases; levetiracetam is more efficacious in reducing seizures than valproic acid as first-line monotherapy antiseizure drug (ASD) in glioma patients; lacosamide and perampanel seem well-tolerated and efficacious add-on ASDs; and a comprehensive framework of palliative and supportive care for high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers was proposed. No pharmacological agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly improve fatigue or neurocognition. CONCLUSIONS Since the 2017 EANO palliative care guidelines, new insights have been reported regarding symptom management and end-of-life care, however, most recommendations remain unchanged. Early palliative care interventions are essential to define goals of care and minimize symptom burden in a timely fashion. Interventional studies that address pain, fatigue, and psychiatric symptoms as well as (the timing of) early palliative care are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B van der Meer
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Pace
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Caroline Hertler
- Competence Center Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Harrison
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, The University of British Colombia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Heather E Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland,USA
| | - Deborah A Forst
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Center, Chennai, India
| | - Kathy Oliver
- International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System and Department of Neurology Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antitumor Potential of Antiepileptic Drugs in Human Glioblastoma: Pharmacological Targets and Clinical Benefits. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11020582. [PMID: 36831117 PMCID: PMC9953000 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by fast-growing cells, genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, and radio-chemo-therapy resistance, contributing to its dismal prognosis. Various medical comorbidities are associated with the natural history of GBM. The most disabling and greatly affecting patients' quality of life are neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment, and GBM-related epilepsy (GRE). Hallmarks of GBM include molecular intrinsic mediators and pathways, but emerging evidence supports the key role of non-malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment in GBM aggressive behavior. In this context, hyper-excitability of neurons, mediated by glutamatergic and GABAergic imbalance, contributing to GBM growth strengthens the cancer-nervous system crosstalk. Pathogenic mechanisms, clinical features, and pharmacological management of GRE with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and their interactions are poorly explored, yet it is a potentially promising field of research in cancer neuroscience. The present review summarizes emerging cooperative mechanisms in oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, focusing on the neuron-to-glioma interface. The main effects and efficacy of selected AEDs used in the management of GRE are discussed in this paper, as well as their potential beneficial activity as antitumor treatment. Overall, although still many unclear processes overlapping in GBM growth and seizure onset need to be elucidated, this review focuses on the intriguing targeting of GBM-neuron mutual interactions to improve the outcome of the so challenging to treat GBM.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A concise review of recent findings in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), with focus on the effect of antitumor treatment on seizure control and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). RECENT FINDINGS Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and its active metabolite d -2-hydroxyglutarate seem important contributing factors to epileptogenesis in BTRE. A beneficial effect of antitumor treatment (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) on seizure control has mainly been demonstrated in low-grade glioma. AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve BTRE patients is not recommended, but AED treatment should be initiated after a first seizure has occurred. Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently lacking, but second-generation AED levetiracetam seems the preferred choice in BTRE. Levetiracetam lacks significant drug-drug interactions, has shown favorable efficacy compared to valproic acid in BTRE, generally causes no hematological or neurocognitive functioning adverse effects, but caution should be exercised with regard to psychiatric adverse effects. Potential add-on AEDs in case of uncontrolled seizures include lacosamide, perampanel, and valproic acid. Ultimately, in the end-of-life phase when oral intake of medication is hampered, benzodiazepines via nonoral administration routes are potential alternatives. SUMMARY Management of seizures in BTRE is complex and with currently available evidence levetiracetam seems the preferred choice. Comparative efficacy RCTs in BTRE are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin J.B. Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Johan A.F. Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sánchez-Villalobos JM, Aledo-Serrano Á, Villegas-Martínez I, Shaikh MF, Alcaraz M. Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:991244. [PMID: 36278161 PMCID: PMC9583251 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.991244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy represents a challenge in the management of patients with brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are one of the most frequent comorbidities in neuro-oncology and may be the debut symptom of a brain tumor or a complication during its evolution. Epileptogenic mechanisms of brain tumors are not yet fully elucidated, although new factors related to the underlying pathophysiological process with possible treatment implications have been described. In recent years, the development of new anti-seizure medications (ASM), with better pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer side effects, has become a paradigm shift in many clinical scenarios in neuro-oncology, being able, for instance, to adapt epilepsy treatment to specific features of each patient. This is crucial in several situations, such as patients with cognitive/psychiatric comorbidity, pregnancy, or advanced age, among others. In this narrative review, we provide a rationale for decision-making in ASM choice for neuro-oncologic patients, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each drug. In addition, according to current literature evidence, we try to answer some of the most frequent questions that arise in daily clinical practice in patients with epilepsy related to brain tumors, such as, which patients are the best candidates for ASM and when to start it, what is the best treatment option for each patient, and what are the major pitfalls to be aware of during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Manuel Sánchez-Villalobos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Complex of Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology and Histology, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ángel Aledo-Serrano
- Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: Ángel Aledo-Serrano,
| | | | - Mohd Farooq Shaikh
- Neuropharmacology Research Laboratory, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Miguel Alcaraz
- Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seidel S, Wehner T, Miller D, Wellmer J, Schlegel U, Grönheit W. Brain tumor related epilepsy: pathophysiological approaches and rational management of antiseizure medication. Neurol Res Pract 2022; 4:45. [PMID: 36059029 PMCID: PMC9442934 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00205-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brain tumor related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common complication of cerebral tumors and its incidence is highly dependent on the type of tumor, ranging from 10–15% in brain metastases to > 80% in low grade gliomas. Clinical management is challenging and has to take into account aspects beyond the treatment of non-tumoral epilepsy. Main body Increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of BTRE, particularly on glutamatergic mechanisms of oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, might influence management of anti-tumor and BTRE treatment in the future. The first seizure implies the diagnosis of epilepsy in patients with brain tumors. Due to the lack of prospective randomized trials in BTRE, general recommendations for focal epilepsies currently apply concerning the initiation of antiseizure medication (ASM). Non-enzyme inducing ASM is preferable. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate, if AMPA inhibitors like perampanel possess anti-tumor effects. ASM withdrawal has to be weighed very carefully against the risk of seizure recurrence, but can be achievable in selected patients. Permission to drive is possible for some patients with BTRE under well-defined conditions, but requires thorough neurological, radiological, ophthalmological and neuropsychological examination.
Conclusion An evolving knowledge on pathophysiology of BTRE might influence future therapy. Randomized trials on ASM in BTRE with reliable endpoints are needed. Management of withdrawal of ASMs and permission to drive demands thorough diagnostic as well as neurooncological and epileptological expertise.
Collapse
|
13
|
Martínez-García M, Servitja Tormo S, Vilariño Quintela N, Arance Fernández A, Berrocal Jaime A, Cantos Sánchez de Ibargüen B, Del Barco Berrón S, García Campelo R, Gironés Sarrió R, Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez J. SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021). Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:703-711. [PMID: 35258806 PMCID: PMC8986739 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02803-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is a severe complication in cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common types of malignant intracranial tumors and are reported in approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancers. The recent increase in incidence of BMs is due to several factors including better diagnostic assessments and the development of improved systemic therapies that have lower activity on the CNS. However, newer systemic therapies are being developed that can cross the blood-brain barrier giving us additional tools to treat BMs. The guidelines presented here focus on the efficacy of new targeted systemic therapies and immunotherapies on CNS BMs from breast, melanoma, and lung cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Martínez-García
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- CIOCC HM Delfos, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Noelia Vilariño Quintela
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia L’Hospitalet, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alfonso Berrocal Jaime
- Medical Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Rosario García Campelo
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain
| | - Regina Gironés Sarrió
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:939-950. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05862-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Zoccarato M, Nardetto L, Basile AM, Giometto B, Zagonel V, Lombardi G. Seizures, Edema, Thrombosis, and Hemorrhages: An Update Review on the Medical Management of Gliomas. Front Oncol 2021; 11:617966. [PMID: 33828976 PMCID: PMC8019972 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients affected with gliomas develop a complex set of clinical manifestations that deeply impact on quality of life and overall survival. Brain tumor-related epilepsy is frequently the first manifestation of gliomas or may occur during the course of disease; the underlying mechanisms have not been fully explained and depend on both patient and tumor factors. Novel treatment options derive from the growing use of third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Vasogenic edema and elevated intracranial pressure cause a considerable burden of symptoms, especially in high-grade glioma, requiring an adequate use of corticosteroids. Patients with gliomas present with an elevated risk of tumor-associated venous thromboembolism whose prophylaxis and treatment are challenging, considering also the availability of new oral anticoagulant drugs. Moreover, intracerebral hemorrhages can complicate the course of the illness both due to tumor-specific characteristics, patient comorbidities, and side effects of antithrombotic and antitumoral therapies. This paper aims to review recent advances in these clinical issues, discussing the medical management of gliomas through an updated literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Zoccarato
- Neurology Unit, O.S.A., Azienda Ospedale-Università, Padua, Italy
| | - Lucia Nardetto
- Neurology Unit, O.S.A., Azienda Ospedale-Università, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Giometto
- Neurology Unit, Trento Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS) di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perampanel in brain tumor and SMART-syndrome related epilepsy - A single institutional experience. J Neurol Sci 2021; 423:117386. [PMID: 33706200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy is common in patients with brain tumors and frequently presents as the first clinical manifestation of an underlying tumor. Despite a number of available antiepileptic drugs (AED), brain tumor related epilepsy (BTRE) may still be difficult to control. Recently, the AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)-type glutamate receptor antagonist perampanel (PER) is increasingly acknowledged as an attractive novel add-on AED for seizure control in BTRE. We present a single institutional experience reporting five individual cases with refractory BTRE treated with PER. In two of these five brain tumor patients, worsening of seizure control was caused by SMART-syndrome (stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy). Efficacy of PER was assessed by the responder rate and by evaluating overall changes in seizure frequency before and during PER treatment. In our case series, a reduction in seizure frequency was observed in four out of five patients and the responder rate was 40%. In addition, both cases with symptomatic epilepsy associated with SMART-syndrome were successfully treated with PER. This case series supports the growing evidence that PER may become a promising add-on AED for the treatment of refractory BTRE as well as for seizure control in SMART-syndrome.
Collapse
|
17
|
You G, Sha Z, Jiang T. Clinical Diagnosis and Perioperative Management of Glioma-Related Epilepsy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:550353. [PMID: 33520690 PMCID: PMC7841407 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.550353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas account for more than half of all adult primary brain tumors. Epilepsy is the most common initial clinical presentation in gliomas. Glioma related epilepsy (GRE) is defined as symptomatic epileptic seizures secondary to gliomas, occurring in nearly 50% in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and up to 90% in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG). Uncontrolled seizures, which have major impact on patients’ quality of life, are caused by multiple factors. Although the anti-seizure medications (ASMs), chemotherapy and radiation therapy are also beneficial for seizure treatment, the overall seizure control for GRE continue to be unsatisfactory. Due to the close relationship between GRE and glioma, surgical resection is often the treatment of choice not only for the tumor treatment, but also for the seizure control. Despite aggressive surgical treatment, there are about 30% of patients continue to have poor seizure control postoperatively. Furthermore, the diagnostic criteria for GRE is not well established. In this review, we propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and perioperative management for GRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gan You
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyi Sha
- Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sepúlveda-Sánchez JM, Pérez-Núñez A. The ESMO-EANO clinical practice guidelines for neurological and vascular complications of primary and secondary brain tumours: a valuable tool for clinicians. Ann Oncol 2020; 32:139-141. [PMID: 33316363 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez
- Neuro-oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | - A Pérez-Núñez
- Neuro-oncology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|