Reappraisal of Oral Steroid Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis-Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction resulting in skeletal muscle weakness. It is equally prevalent in males and females, but debuts at a younger age in females and at an older age in males. Ptosis, diplopia, facial bulbar weakness, and limb weakness are the most common symptoms. MG can be classified based on the presence of serum autoantibodies. Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies are found in 80%-85% of patients, muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies in 5%-8%, and <1% may have low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (Lrp4) antibodies. Approximately 10% of patients are seronegative for antibodies binding the known disease-related antigens. In patients with AChR MG, 10%-20% have a thymoma, which is usually detected at the onset of the disease. Important differences between clinical presentation, treatment responsiveness, and disease mechanisms have been observed between these different serologic MG classes. Besides the typical clinical features and serologic testing, the diagnosis can be established with additional tests, including repetitive nerve stimulation, single fiber EMG, and the ice pack test. Treatment options for MG consist of symptomatic treatment (such as pyridostigmine), immunosuppressive treatment, or thymectomy. Despite the treatment with symptomatic drugs, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants, intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and thymectomy, a large proportion of patients remain chronically dependent on corticosteroids (CS). In the past decade, the number of treatment options for MG has considerably increased. Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology have led to new treatment options targeting B or T cells, the complement cascade, the neonatal Fc receptor or cytokines. In the future, these new treatments are likely to reduce the chronic use of CS, diminish side effects, and decrease the number of patients with refractory disease.

Myasthenia gravis: Molecular mechanisms and promising therapeutic strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a type of autoimmune disease caused by the blockage of neuromuscular junction transmission owing to the attack of autoantibodies on transmission-related proteins. Related antibodies, such as anti-AChR, anti-MuSK and anti-LRP4 antibodies, can be detected in most patients with MG. Although traditional therapies can control most symptoms, several challenges remain to be addressed, necessitating the development of more effective and safe treatment strategies for MG. With the in-depth exploration on the mechanism and immune targets of MG, effective therapies, especially therapies using biologicals, have been reported recently. Given the important roles of immune cells, cytokines and intercellular interactions in the pathological process of MG, B-cell targeted therapy, T-cell targeted therapy, proteasome inhibitors targeting plasma cell, complement inhibitors, FcRn inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of MG. Although these novel therapies exert good therapeutic effects, they may weaken the immunity and increase the risk of infection in MG patients. This review elaborates on the pathogenesis of MG and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the strategies of traditional treatment and biologicals. In addition, this review emphasises that combined therapy may have better therapeutic effects and reducing the risk of side effects of treatments, which has great prospects for the treatment of MG. With the deepening of research on immunotherapy targets in MG, novel opportunities and challenges in the treatment of MG will be introduced.

Myasthenia Gravis: Novel Findings and Perspectives on Traditional to Regenerative Therapeutic Interventions

The prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder, is increasing among all subsets of the population leading to an elevated economic and social burden. The pathogenesis of MG is characterized by the synthesis of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), or muscle-specific kinase at the neuromuscular junction, thereby leading to muscular weakness and fatigue. Based on clinical and laboratory examinations, the research is focused on distinguishing MG from other autoimmune, genetic diseases of neuromuscular transmission. Technological advancements in machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI) have been assistive in accurate diagnosis and management. Besides, addressing the clinical needs of MG patients is critical to improving quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction. Lifestyle changes including physical exercise and traditional Chinese medicine/herbs have also been shown to exert an ameliorative impact on MG progression. To achieve enhanced therapeutic efficacy, cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressive drugs, and steroids in addition to plasma exchange therapy are widely recommended. Under surgical intervention, thymectomy is the only feasible alternative to removing thymoma to overcome thymoma-associated MG. Although these conventional and current therapeutic approaches are effective, the associated adverse events and surgical complexity limit their wide application. Moreover, Restivo et al. also, to increase survival and QoL, further recent developments revealed that antibody, gene, and regenerative therapies (such as stem cells and exosomes) are currently being investigated as a safer and more efficacious alternative. Considering these above-mentioned points, we have comprehensively reviewed the recent advances in pathological etiologies of MG including COVID-19, and its therapeutic management.

Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis with or without anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies: a worldwide and Japanese perspective

INTRODUCTION

The management of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been improved due to immunotherapy advances, but 20% of individuals with MG are refractory to the conventional therapy, and the need for novel biological drugs remains.

AREA COVERED

The Japanese clinical guidelines for MG published in May 2022 include the concept that treatment is often lifelong and should aim to maintain a sufficient quality of life and mental health. We provide an overview of the therapeutic strategy for generalized MG in Japan, in comparison with the international consensus. We summarize the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of efgartigimod, the first approved anti-neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor for MG. A phase III study showed that efgartigimod was well-tolerated and efficacious in patients with generalized MG.

EXPERT OPINION

Efgartigimod is a promising biological drug for patients with moderate to severe generalized MG with or without anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in Japan.

Corticosteroid Treatment-Resistance in Myasthenia Gravis

Chronic, high-dose, oral prednisone has been the mainstay of myasthenia gravis treatment for decades and has proven to be highly beneficial in many, toxic in some way to all, and not effective in a significant minority. No patient characteristics or biomarkers are predictive of treatment response leading to many patients suffering adverse effects with no benefit. Presently, measurements of treatment response, whether taken from clinician or patient perspective, are appreciated to be limited by lack of good correlation, which then complicates correlation to biological measures. Treatment response may be limited because disease mechanisms are not influenced by corticosteroids, limits on dosage because of adverse effects, or individual differences in corticosteroids. This review evaluates potential mechanisms that underlie lack of response to glucocorticoids in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Long-Term Improvement in a Chinese Cohort of Glucocorticoid-Resistant Childhood-Onset Myasthenia Gravis Patients Treated With Tacrolimus

Objectives

To evaluate the long-term outcome of tacrolimus for childhood-onset myasthenia gravis (CMG) with an inadequate response to glucocorticoids, and investigate factors associated with favorable outcomes following tacrolimus treatment.

Methods

A retrospective, observational cohort study was performed for CMG patients who had not improved satisfactorily after sufficient prednisone therapy for at least 8 weeks. All patients were given tacrolimus in doses of 2–3 mg for more than 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was assessed using the prednisone dose, quantitative MG (QMG), and MG-activity of daily living (ADL) scores. The participants were divided into improved and unimproved groups based on changes in QMG scores to investigate the risk factors that affected tacrolimus efficacy.

Results

A total of 149 glucocorticoid resistant CMG patients were finally enrolled in our study, with 113 (75.8%) responding well to tacrolimus (defined as minimal manifestation status or better). One month after initiating tacrolimus, there was a noticeable improvement in prednisone dose, QMG, and ADL scores, which continued to improve throughout the study. More importantly, the prednisone was eventually stopped in 89 of the patients (78.8%). Thymus type [odds ratio (OR) = 3.156, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.427–6.978; P = 0.005] and pre-intervention status (OR = 0.284, 95%CI 0.109–0.741; P = 0.010) were independent predictors of tacrolimus efficacy after controlling for confounding factors in multiple logistic regression.

Conclusion

The majority of glucocorticoid-resistant CMG patients have a good long-term prognosis after adding tacrolimus. Thymus type and pre-intervention status can serve as potential predictors affecting the efficacy of tacrolimus.

Adverse Side Effects Associated with Corticosteroid Therapy: A Study in 39 Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Background

The tolerability of high-dose oral corticosteroids in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) has not been systematically assessed. We evaluated adverse side effects (ASEs) of corticosteroid treatment in patients with gMG.

Material/Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted of ASEs reported as being related to corticosteroid treatment in 39 patients with gMG who were treated with oral corticosteroids for ≥1 year.

Results

Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 60 (21) years, 53.8% of patients were women, and 66.7% were aged ≤65 years. Median (IQR) prednisone treatment duration was 14 (2) months; median (IQR) daily dose was 40 (15) mg. The median number of ASEs reported as corticosteroid-related was 2/patient (IQR, 1). Pre-diabetes and weight gain were most common (each 43.6% of patients). Bruising, insomnia, and osteoporosis were more prevalent in patients aged >65 years, while irritability, osteopenia, and pre-diabetes were more common in patients aged ≤65 years, although differences were not statistically significant. Irritability and weight gain were more prevalent in women (P=0.010 for irritability); osteoporosis and pre-diabetes more common in men (P=0.015 for osteoporosis). ASEs were generally more common in the high-dose prednisone group (>30 mg/day), but were only statistically significant for irritability (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Corticosteroid-related ASEs were common in patients with gMG. Some of these ASEs can have serious medical consequences, and certain ASEs appeared to be associated with specific patient characteristics. Demographics and comorbidities of patients with gMG must be carefully considered before corticosteroid initiation. Potential ASEs, such as unanticipated osteoporosis in men, require extra vigilance.