Y-Stent Rescue Technique for Failed Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case Series and Pooled Analysis

Double Stent Retriever Technique for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy using a double stent retriever technique has recently been described for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, but its efficacy and safety are not well-established.

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate reports of the use of a double stent retriever technique during the endovascular treatment of patients with ischemic stroke.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched to identify all studies (clinical trials, cohort series, and case reports) investigating the utility of a double stent retriever technique for the treatment of stroke. The study is reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023482691).

STUDY SELECTION

Seventeen studies involving a total of 128 patients with large-vessel occlusions predominantly in the anterior circulation (93.0%) were identified.

DATA ANALYSIS

Outcomes of interest were the prevalence of successful recanalization (modified TICI ≥2b) and a first-pass effect following the double stent retriever technique as well as complications such as iatrogenic dissections and SAH. Data were pooled using a random effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The double stent retriever technique was used as a rescue strategy in occlusions refractory to conventional endovascular treatment in 68.7% (88/128) of patients and as a first-line strategy in 31.3% (40/128) of patients. The double stent retriever technique achieved an overall final modified TICI ≥2b in 92.6% cases, with a first-pass effect of 76.6%. The complication rate remained low, with 0.37% dissection and 1.56% SAH.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of the study include the following: 1) a large number of case reports or small series, 2) a meta-analysis of proportions with no statistical comparison with a control group, and 3) the lack of access to patient-level data.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that double stent retriever thrombectomy may be safe and associated with good recanalization outcomes, but prospective comparative studies are needed to determine which patients may benefit from this endovascular procedure.

[Neurothrombectomy 2022-Extension of indications and technical innovations]

For advanced territorial ischemia numerous retrospective and prospective studies have shown a positive effect of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to best medicinal treatment alone. For patients with minor stroke (NIHSS < 6) there is currently a lack of evidence for MT. Appropriate study protocols must differentiate between patients with large vessel occlusion with disproportionately mild symptoms and more distal vascular occlusion and therefore correspondingly fewer clinical symptoms. The role of intravenous lysis treatment before MT as bridging lysis also currently retains its general recommendation, as large studies could not show a uniform noninferiority of MT alone. In addition, the use of intra-arterial lysis after successful MT offers a promising approach, which still needs to be evaluated. Novel aspiration catheters and stent-retrievers as well as competing thrombectomy techniques can be compared by the first pass effect, the successful recanalization with only one attempt at thrombectomy. Contact aspiration and stent-retriever thrombectomy under aspiration are equivalent and established thrombectomy procedures. For the latter, several detailed maneuver tactics are described for improvement of thrombectomy success. Also, in retrospective studies the combination with a balloon-guided catheter promises a further improvement of recanalization results. In the case of failure of supra-aortic vessel probing with inguinal access, radial access and direct carotid puncture are alternative access routes. Recent studies on ICA stenting with tandem occlusions showed a benefit of stents without an increased risk for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The retrograde approach, to first treat the intracranial vessel occlusion and then the carotid stenosis, seems to be advantageous.

Increased Number of Passes and Double Stent Retriever Technique Induces Cumulative Injury on Arterial Wall After Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Swine Model

The number of stentriever passes during endovascular thrombectomy impacts clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Previous studies suggest that the simultaneous double stent retriever technique (DSRT) could improve the efficacy and reduce the number of passes. We aim to analyze the degree of vessel wall injury according to the number of passes and technique (single vs. simultaneous devices). Histological changes were evaluated in renal arteries (RAs) of swine models after thrombectomy (1, 2, or 3 passes) with single stent (SSRT) and DSRT. Thrombectomy passes were performed in 12 RA: 3 samples from each artery were studied by optical microscopy to assess a vascular damage score. All thirty-six samples showed endothelial denudation and different degrees of damage in the deepest layers of the arterial wall; however, all arteries remained patent by the time of assessment. In all cases, the degree of vascular injury increased with the number of passes. Compared with a SSRT, DSRT showed a higher severity of histological damage corresponding to the damage caused by 1.4 SSRT passes. However, in distal arteries, vascular damage was relatively similar when comparing SSRT with multiple passes and DSRT with one pass. The degree of vessel injury increases with the number of passes. Even though histological damage per pass was 1.4 higher with DSRT than SSRT, short-term vessel patency was not compromised after up to 3 DSRT passes. Further studies are needed to characterize the risk-benefit ratio of the DSRT in routine clinical practice.

First-line Double Stentriever Thrombectomy for M1/TICA Occlusions : Initial Experiences

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion; however, mechanical thrombectomy fails to achieve adequate recanalization in nearly one third of these cases. Rescue therapy using two stentrievers simultaneously yields good results in clots refractory to single stentriever treatment. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of first-line double stentriever thrombectomy for acute occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and/or terminal internal carotid artery (TICA).

METHODS

This single-center study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with a single M1/TICA occlusion to undergo double stentriever thrombectomy between May and October 2020. Outcomes included successful recanalization (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI 2b/3), first-pass effect, procedure times, number of device passes, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) at discharge, 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0-2), and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed 39 patients median age 79 years (range 42-96 years); 23 (58.9%) female; 19 (48.7%) with TICA occlusions; 5 (12.8%) with mRS 3-5 at admission; mean NIHSS at admission, 17 ± 4.39). Mean time from symptom onset to final angiogram was 238.0 ± 94.6 min; mean intervention duration was 36.0 ± 24.2 min. The mean number of device passes was 1.5 ± 1.07. All patients had final TICI 2b/3, and 27 (69%) had TICI 2c/3 after the first pass. We observed 3 (7.9%) cases of intracerebral symptomatic hemorrhages. At 90 days, 16 (41%) patients were functionally independent and 9 (23%) had died. The percentage of patients with good clinical outcome at 90 days was 55.5% in the first-pass subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that first-line double stentriever thrombectomy is safe and effective for M1/TICA occlusions.