Analysis of the Skew Deviation to Evaluate the Period of Onset of a Canalolithiasis After Macular Damage

Episodic Vertigo: A Narrative Review Based on a Single-Center Clinical Experience

(1) Background: Usually, the majority of patients suffering from vertigo and dizziness can be identified in four major categories: acute spontaneous vertigo, episodic (recurrent) vertigo, recurrent positional vertigo, and chronic imbalance. Our purpose is to retrospectively evaluate the main causes of episodic vertigo and to find indications for a reliable clinical suspicion useful for a definitive diagnosis, comparing patients affected by different presenting symptomatology (acute vertigo, recurrent episodic vertigo, and imbalance). (2) Methods: we retrospectively evaluated the clinical records in a population of 249 consecutive patients observed for vertigo in our tertiary referral center in the period 1 January 2019-31 January 2020. On the basis of the reported clinical history, patients were divided into three groups: patients with their first ever attack of vertigo, patients with recurrent vertigo and dizziness, and patients with chronic imbalance. (3) Results: On the basis of the results of the instrumental examination, we arbitrarily divided (for each type of symptoms) the patients in a group with a normal vestibular instrumental examination and a group of patients in which the clinical-instrumental evaluation showed some pathological results; a highly significant difference (p: 0.157) was found between recurrent and acute vertigo and between recurrent vertigo and imbalance. (4) Conclusions: Patients with recurrent vertigo more frequently exhibit a negative otoneurological examination since they are often examined in the intercritical phase. A precise and in-depth research of the patient's clinical history is the key to suspect or make a diagnosis together with the search for some instrumental or clinical hallmark, especially in cases where the clinical picture does not fully meet the international diagnostic criteria.

The value of vestibular graviceptive pathway evaluation in the diagnosis of unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of vestibular graviceptive pathway (VGP) in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (UPVD) has received increasing attention from researchers. The study aimed to investigate the value of VGP evaluation in the diagnosis of UPVD.

METHODS

Ninety-five UPVD patients were divided into attack and remission phase groups. VGP evaluation-related indicators, including subjective visual vertical (SVV), subjective visual horizontal (SVH), head tilt, ocular torsion (OT), and skew deviation (SD), were measured, and their correlations with cochleovestibular function test results were analyzed. The possible etiologies of contralesional VGP (c-VGP) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Positive rates of SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were significantly higher, and the degrees of SVV, SVH, and OT were significantly greater in the attack phase group than the remission phase group. The sides with abnormal VGP evaluation results were correlated with the sides with hearing loss, abnormal caloric, and video head impulse test (vHIT) results. A total of 14 patients showed c-VGP, and possible etiologies included contralateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (n = 4), bilateral hearing loss (n = 8), bilateral vHIT gain reduction (n = 1), autoimmune diseases (n = 6), vascular risk factors (n = 6), lacunar infarction (n = 3), and endolymphatic hydrops (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations in SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were noted in UPVD patients in different phases, which are presumed to be related to dynamic vestibular compensation; correlations between VGP evaluation results and cochleovestibular function test results indicate that VGP evaluation may be helpful for the diagnosis of the side affected in UPVD; the presence of c-VGP may be related to bilateral labyrinth lesions or endolymphatic hydrops on the affected side; and the involvement of autoimmune mechanisms also deserves attention.

Congenital ocular counter-roll: a review of cases treated exclusively by ophthalmologists

AIM

To review the demographics, clinical manifestations, and surgical experiences of patients with congenital ocular counter-roll, whose treatments were performed exclusively by ophthalmologists.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted consisting of patients who received strabismus surgery between 2017 to 2019. Patients with obvious ocular counter-roll were included.

RESULTS

A total of 7008 patients who received strabismus surgery, 28 (12 males, 16 females) were diagnosed as congenital ocular counter-roll, accounting for 0.40%. All patients were initially misdiagnosed: 21 patients were misdiagnosed as superior oblique palsy (SOP), 3 as inferior oblique overaction, 2 as dissociated vertical deviation (DVD), 1 as superior oblique overaction with A-pattern exotropia, and 1 as medial rectus palsy. The mean±SD age was 12.4±9.4y (range 2.5-36y). The most common clinical findings included ocular counter-roll, vertical deviation or vertical deviation combined with outward deviation and head tilt. At follow-up, an excellent surgical result was achieved in 20 patients. Preoperative horizontal deviation of 26±24 prism diopter (PD) and vertical deviation of 18±12 PD were reduced to 0±12 PD (P=0.0001) and 3±4 PD (P=0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Congenital ocular counter-roll is a rare supranuclear vertical strabismus caused by congenital abnormalities involving vestibule-ocular reflex pathways. In addition to ocular counter-roll, the most salient clinical features included, but are not limited to, hyperdeviation, outward deviation, overelevation in adduction and head tilt.