Evaluation of the Direct Effect of Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus on Levodopa-Induced On-Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease

Controlled-Release Levodopa for the Treatment of Rapid Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease Subjects with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Objectives  We aimed to investigate the efficiency of controlled-release levodopa/benserazide (Madopar HBS) use during daytime in our pilot study on advanced-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) therapy. Methods  We have evaluated all PD subjects with STN-DBS who had admitted to our outpatient polyclinic between February 2022 and March 2022. Among these patients, those who were taking levodopa therapy at least five times throughout the day and the efficiency of levodopa lasted less than 3 hours were detected. The standard levodopa therapy was switched to Madopar HBS in all patients who accepted the therapy chance and the clinical evaluation of the patients on Madopar HBS therapy was performed in the second month of the therapy. Results  Ultimately, the follow-up of all four patients in whom the levodopa therapy was changed to Madopar HBS yielded a significant reduction in the "off" periods and improvement in the PSQ-39 scores. Conclusion  We suggest the use of Madopar HBS in PD patients with STN-DBS surgery suffering from motor fluctuations, particularly in the subgroup with milder dyskinesias. Future study results of a large number of PD subjects with STN-DBS therapy are warranted to confirm our observations. The results of these studies may provide critical applications in clinical practice.

A Review on Response to Device-Aided Therapies Used in Monogenic Parkinsonism and GBA Variants Carriers: A Need for Guidelines and Comparative Studies

Parkinson's disease (PD) is in some cases predisposed-or-caused by genetic variants, contributing to the expression of different phenotypes. Regardless of etiology, as the disease progresses, motor fluctuations and/or levodopa-induced dyskinesias limit the benefit of pharmacotherapy. Device-aided therapies are good alternatives in advanced disease, including deep brain stimulation (DBS), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and continuous subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine. Candidate selection and timing are critical for the success of such therapies. Genetic screening in DBS cohorts has shown a higher proportion of mutation carriers than in general cohorts, suggesting that genetic factors may influence candidacy for advanced therapies. The response of monogenic PD to device therapies is not well established, and the contribution of genetic information to decision-making is still a matter of debate. The limited evidence regarding gene-dependent response to device-aided therapies is reviewed here. An accurate understanding of the adequacy and responses of different mutation carriers to device-aided therapies requires the development of specific studies with long-term monitoring.

Retrospective Multicenter Study on Outcome Measurement for Dyskinesia Improvement in Parkinson's Disease Patients with Pallidal and Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), among which the therapeutic targets commonly used include the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi). Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is one of the common motor complications arising in PD patients on chronic treatment with levodopa. In this article, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of LID with the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) in patients who underwent DBS in multiple centers with a GPi or an STN target. Meanwhile, the Med off MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS-Ⅲ) and the levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) were also observed as secondary indicators. PD patients with a GPi target showed a more significant improvement in the UDysRS compared with an STN target (92.9 ± 16.7% vs. 66.0 ± 33.6%, p < 0.0001). Both the GPi and the STN showed similar improvement in Med off UPDRS-III scores (49.8 ± 22.6% vs. 52.3 ± 29.5%, p = 0.5458). However, the LEDD was obviously reduced with the STN target compared with the GPi target (44.6 ± 28.1% vs. 12.2 ± 45.8%, p = 0.006).

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Forel's Field for Dystonia: Preliminary Results

The field of Forel (FF) is a subthalamic area through which the pallidothalamic tracts originating from the globus pallidus internus (GPi) traverse. The FF was used as a stereotactic surgical target (ablation and stimulation) to treat cervical dystonia in the 1960s and 1970s. Although recent studies have reappraised the ablation and stimulation of the pallidothalamic tract at FF for Parkinson’s disease, the efficacy of deep brain stimulation of FF (FF-DBS) for dystonia has not been well investigated. To confirm the efficacy and stimulation-induced adverse effects of FF-DBS, three consecutive patients with medically refractory dystonia who underwent FF-DBS were analyzed (tongue protrusion dystonia, cranio-cervico-axial dystonia, and hemidystonia). Compared to the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-Movement Scale scores before surgery (23.3 ± 12.7), improvements were observed at 1 week (8.3 ± 5.9), 3 months (5.3 ± 5.9), and 6 months (4.7 ± 4.7, p = 0.0282) after surgery. Two patients had stimulation-induced complications, including bradykinesia and postural instability, all well controlled by stimulation adjustments.