BPPV: Comparison of the SémontPLUS With the Sémont Maneuver: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Semont maneuver for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

This review aimed to examine the effects of the Semont maneuver on posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

METHODS

PubMed, PEDro, SCOPUS, REHABDATA, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched comprehensively from inception to January 2024. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was employed to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.

RESULTS

In total, 18 randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2237 participants with BPPV (mean age = 58.10 years) were included in this review. Among them, 37.5% were males, and 58% presented with right-sided BPPV. The included studies ranked from 5 to 9 out of 10 (Median = 7), suggesting good to excellent quality on the PEDro scale. The available literature revealed that the Semont maneuver is effective in improving posterior canal BPPV symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The Semont maneuver is considered a standard option for treating posterior canal BPPV, with a high success rate of around 80%. It is suggested as the primary option for managing posterior canal BPPV in individuals who complain of cervical or lumbar problems, severe cardiac or respiratory conditions. Further studies are strongly needed to understand the long-term effects of the Semont maneuver and to identify the recurrence rate.

[The six most frequent peripheral vestibular syndromes]

Three forms of peripheral vestibular disorders, each with its typical symptoms and clinical signs, can be differentiated functionally, anatomically and pathophysiologically: 1. inadequate unilateral paroxysmal stimulation or rarely inhibition of the peripheral vestibular system, e. g., BPPV, Menière's disease, vestibular paroxysmia or syndrome of the third mobile windows; 2. acute unilateral vestibulopathy leading to an acute vestibular tone imbalance manifesting as an acute peripheral vestibular syndrome; and 3. loss or impairment of function of the vestibular nerve and/or labyrinth: bilateral vestibulopathy. For all of these diseases, current diagnostic criteria by the Bárány-Society are available with a high clinical and scientific impact, also for clinical trials. The treatment depends on the underlying disease. It basically consists of 5 principles: 1. Explaining the symptoms and signs, pathophysiology, aetiology and treatment options to the patient; this is important for compliance, adherence and persistence. 2. Physical therapy: A) For BPPV specific liberatory maneuvers, depending on canal involved. Posterior canal: The new SémontPLUS maneuver is superior to the regular Sémont and Epley maneuvers; horizontal canal: the modified roll-maneuver; anterior canal the modified Yacovino-maneuver; 3. Symptomatic or causative drug therapy. There is still a deficit of placebo-controlled clinical trials so that the level of evidence for pharmacotherapy is most often low. 4. Surgery, mainly for the syndrome of the third mobile windows. 5. Psychotherapeutic measures for secondary functional dizziness.

Neurological update: neuro-otology 2023

Much has changed since our last review of recent advances in neuro-otology 7 years ago. Unfortunately there are still not many practising neuro-otologists, so that most patients with vestibular problems need, in the first instance, to be evaluated and treated by neurologists whose special expertise is not neuro-otology. The areas we consider here are mostly those that almost any neurologist should be able to start managing: acute spontaneous vertigo in the Emergency Room-is it vestibular neuritis or posterior circulation stroke; recurrent spontaneous vertigo in the office-is it vestibular migraine or Meniere's disease and the most common vestibular problem of all-benign positional vertigo. Finally we consider the future: long-term vestibular monitoring and the impact of machine learning on vestibular diagnosis.

The Semont-Plus Maneuver or the Epley Maneuver in Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Clinical Study

Importance

Questions remain concerning treatment efficacy for the common condition of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of the Semont-plus maneuver (SM-plus) and the Epley maneuver (EM) for treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (pcBPPV) canalolithiasis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed at 3 national referral centers (in Munich, Germany; Siena, Italy; and Bruges, Belgium) over 2 years, with a follow-up to 4 weeks after the initial examination. Recruitment took place from June 1, 2020, until March 10, 2022. Patients were selected randomly during routine outpatient care after being referred to 1 of the 3 centers. Two hundred fifty-three patients were assessed for eligibility. After consideration of the exclusion criteria as well as informed consent, 56 patients were excluded and 2 declined to participate, with 195 participants included in the final analysis. The analysis was prespecified and per-protocol.

Interventions

After being randomized to the SM-plus or the EM group, patients received 1 initial maneuver from a physician, then subsequently performed self-maneuvers at home 3 times in the morning, 3 times at noon, and 3 times in the evening.

Main Outcome and Measures

Patients had to document whether they could provoke positional vertigo every morning. The primary end point was the number of days until no positional vertigo could be induced on 3 consecutive mornings. The secondary end point was the effect of the single maneuver performed by the physician.

Results

Of the 195 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (13.9) years, and 125 (64.1%) were women. The mean (SD) time until no positional vertigo attacks could be induced in the SM-plus group was 2.0 (1.6) days (median, 1 [range, 1-8] day; 95% CI, 1.64-2.28 days); in the EM group, 3.3 (3.6) days (median, 2 [range, 1-20] days; 95% CI, 2.62-4.06 days) (P = .01; α = .05, 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test). For the secondary end point (effect of a single maneuver), no significant difference was detected (67 of 98 [68.4%] vs 61 of 97 [62.9%]; P = .42; α = .05). No serious adverse event was detected with both maneuvers. Nineteen patients (19.6%) in the EM group and 24 (24.5%) in the SM-plus group experienced relevant nausea.

Conclusions and Relevance

The SM-plus self-maneuver is superior to the EM self-maneuver in terms of the number of days until recovery in pcBPPV.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05853328.

Triple Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and the Strength of Remote Video-Based Management

This case report describes remote video-based diagnosis and management of triple posttraumatic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Design and analysis of HSC-BPPV diagnostic maneuver based on virtual simulation

Background

The preferred supine roll test for the diagnosis of horizontal semicircular canal BPPV has several disadvantages, including difficulty in locating the affected ear, inconsistent nystagmus performance on repeated testing, and lack of a typical latency period, resulting in insensitive diagnosis.

Objectives

To investigate novel diagnostic techniques with more scientific design, more accessible application, and better diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

Materials and methods

Based on clinical microscopic CT data, we created a virtual simulation model of BPPV using Unity software. The physical simulation of the traditional supine roll test was performed to observe and analyse the movement of the otoliths, whose initial position was the typical stable position. In addition, the normal vectors of the plane and crista ampullaris of the horizontal semicircular canal were measured using 3D Slicer software. Based on this, we analyzed the critical steps for designing diagnostic maneuvers for BPPV in the horizontal semicircular canal. For a more accurate diagnosis of horizontal semicircular canal BPPV, it is critical to rotate the horizontal semicircular canal to be parallel to gravity. It is also necessary to move the otolith by swinging the head. As a result, we developed two diagnostic maneuvers: the 60° roll test and the prone roll test. We also performed simulations to observe otolith movement and predict nystagmus performance.

Conclusions

The 60° roll test and the prone roll test can complement the supine roll test. Compared to the supine roll test, they not only effectively differentiate canalolithiasis from cupulolithiasis, but also make it easier to determine the position of the otoliths, and the characteristics of the nystagmus are more pronounced. Significant diagnostic features have significant potential benefits for home and telemedicine.